Cases

717 F.Supp. 575 (1989) AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL and Jeffrey Buckley Cockrell, Plaintiffs, v. UAL CORPORATION, United Air Lines, Inc., Neil A. Armstrong, Andrew F. Brimmer, Edward W. Carlson, Richard P. Cooley, E. Mandell de Windt, William M. Jenkins, Juanita M. Kreps, Charles F. Luce, Fujio Matsuda, John F. McGillicuddy, Harry Mullikin, James J. O'Connor, Frank A. Olson, Nicholas R. Petry, John C. Pope, and Stephen M. Wolf, Defe

Re Document Nos.: 14, 43, 44, 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Denying as Moot Defendants’ and Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment; and Denying as Moot Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement the Administrative RECORD RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. I

Re Document Nos.: 19, 30, 31, 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Dependants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record as Moot; and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for DISCOVERY RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. This case presents a collision of interests between domestic airlines, which seek to avoid competing against subsidized foreign carriers, and domestic aircraft manufacturers, which desire those foreign carriers to buy U.S. planes rather than shopping overseas. Plaintiffs here are organizations representing the interests of certain U.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ' JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. The Export-Import Bank of the United States has long been in the business of issuing loan guarantees to support foreign airlines’ purchases of aircraft from domestic manufacturers. While the Bank’s involvement in the air-travel industry undoubtedly serves the interests of

Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, we must determine whether the court of appeals erred by reversing the trial court’s order granting summary judgement in favor of multiple defendants on the plaintiffs claims for breach.of contract and tortious’ interference with contract. Because we conclude that the plaintiffs employer was not

ON BACK PAY AND SENIORITY SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge. In Inda v. United Air Lines, Inc., 565 F.2d 554, 562 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007, 98 S.Ct. 1877, 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978), the Ninth Circuit ruled “[t]he judgment in Moritz’s favor should be modified to award back pay to the November 14, 1968, violation and adjust seniority accordingly.” The basis for the Circuit Cour

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Flying Tiger Line, Inc. (“Flying Tiger”) and the Flying Tiger pilots’ former union entered into a collectively bargained agreement regarding pilot pension benefits. Appellants, four former Flying Tiger pilots, seek enforcement of the terms of the summary plan description of the pension agreement pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1022(a)(1) of the Employee Retiremen

720 F.Supp. 1505 (1989) In re AIR CRASH DISASTER AT STAPLETON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, DENVER, COLORADO, ON NOVEMBER 15, 1987. MDL No. 751. United States District Court, D. Colorado. June 7, 1989. Opinion on Amended Judgment and Prejudgment Interest June 7, 1989. Order on Motions to Reconsider July 18, 1989.

LOKEN, Chief Judge. Trans World Airlines (“TWA”) fired mechanic David H. Conrad for failing to pay dues to the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (the “IAM”), as required by the collective bargaining agreement between the IAM and TWA (“the Agreement”). Conrad then commenced this action against the IAM and TWA, alleging that their refusal to permit him

Re Document Nos.: 12, 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION Gkanting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The Export-Import Bank (“Ex-Im Bank” or “Bank”) is an independent

291 F.3d 503 In re AIR CRASH AT LITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS, ON JUNE 1, 1999.Anna Lloyd, Appellee,v.American Airlines, Inc. Appellant.United States; Air Transport Association of America, Inc., Amici on Behalf of Appellant. No. 01-1047. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 15, 2001. Filed: May 29, 2002.

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00342-CV ___________________________ BAKER AVIATION, LLC AND BAKER AVIATION MAINTENANCE, LLC, Appellants V. DOUBLE H INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 96th Di

933 F.2d 1390 Jayne REID-WALEN, Gary Walen, Appellants,v.Leroy HANSEN, Irene Hansen, d/b/a Yellow Bird Sea-Tel, Appellees. No. 89-3000. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 9, 1990.Decided May 15, 1991.Rehearing and Rehearing En BancDenied Aug. 13, 1991. Robert T. Bergin, J

331 F.Supp.2d 1176 (2004) In re AIR CRASH OVER THE TAIWAN STRAITS ON MAY 25, 2002. No. CV 03-3635 MMM (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 20, 2004. *1177 *1178 *1179 Stuart R. Fraenkel, Esq., Gretchen M. Nelson, Esq., Kreindler & Kreindl

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge MIKVA. MIKVA, Chief Judge: On September 1, 1983, a Korean Air Lines (“KAL”) Boeing 747 airliner was shot down somewhere over the Sea of Japan by one of the Soviet Union’s military aircraft, killing all 269 persons on board. The flight recorders and most of the wreckage were never recovered, so the exact details of what happened remain a mystery. Numerous wrongful d

251 F.3d 1178 (8th Cir. 2001) FRIENDS OF RICHARDS-GEBAUR AIRPORT; CITY OF GRANDVIEW, MISSOURI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PETITIONERS,v.FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, JANE GARVEY, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENT.CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI; THE KANSAS SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, INTERVENORS ON APPEAL.AIRCRAFT OWNERS AND PILOTS ASSOCIATION, AMICUS ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER.AIRCRAFT OWNERS AND PILOTS ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER,v.FEDE

928 F.2d 1167 289 U.S.App.D.C. 75 Fred WYLER, Individually and as a Personal Representative ofthe Estate of William Paul Wyler, Deceased, forthe Benefit of Himself and Helen C.Wyler, et al., Appellants,v.KOREAN AIR LINES COMPANY, LTD., et al. Nos. 86-5400, 86-5401, 86-5403 to 86-5413, 86-5415 to86-5427, 86-5429, 86-5431, 86-5515 to 86-5524,86-5562, 86-5596, 87-5016,

957 F.2d 933 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2679, 60 USLW 2620,121 Lab.Cas. P 10,024 Wilfredo COLON VELEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.PUERTO RICO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant, Appellant.Wilfredo COLON VELEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.PUERTO RICO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant, Appellee,International Longshoremen Association, Local 1575,Defendant, Appellant.

545 F.2d 194 178 U.S.App.D.C. 116 ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner,v.CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent,Wien Air Alaska, Inc., Alaska Airlines Master ExecutiveCouncil, Intervenor.BP ALASKA, INC., Petitioner,v.CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent,Wien Air Alaska, Inc., Alaska Airlines Master ExecutiveCouncil, Intervenor. Nos. 75-1670, 75-1674.