Cases

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff John J. Hamzik (“plaintiff’ or “Hamzik”) initiated this action on January *27120, 2011. On March 17, 2011, he filed an amended complaint against defendants Office for People with Developmental Disabilities (“OPWDD”); Broome

19-1453 Pettaway v. National Recovery Solutions In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2019 Argued: January 17, 2020 Decided: April 9, 2020 Docket No. 19-1453 JEAN M. PETTAWAY, INDIVIDUALLY

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On October 5, 2012, the Plaintiff Salvatore Agosta (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this employment discrimination action against the Defendants Suffolk County (the “County”), Suffolk County Department of Public Works (the “DPW”), Kevin Spence (“Spence”), Robert Beck (“Beck”), Frank Calvacca (“Calvacca”), Alfred Morales (“Morales”) and Dana Pana (“Pana,” an

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. Plaintiff Dennis Kuder (“Kuder”), an employee of the City of Rochester’s (the “City”) Department of Environmental Services (“DES”), commenced the instant action against the City, Supervisor Charles Lundy (“Lundy”), and DES Commissioner Paul Holohan (“Holohan”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Kuder, who was employed by th

DECISION & ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Maria Aron (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Hon. Carl F. Becker, County Judge of Delaware County, New York (“Judge Becker”), the State of New York (“New York”), New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (“Governor Cuomo”) (collectively “the State Defendants”); Christa Schafer, Clerk, Delaware County

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This case arises from allegations by the Plaintiff Vicki L. Conforti (the “Plaintiff’) that from 2005 to 2014, while she was employed by the Defendants Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. (“Sunbelt”) and On Site Energy Company, Inc. (“On Site”), her supervisors discriminated against her on the basis of her gender, subjected her to a hostile work environment, and

OPINION AND ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, District Judge. Plaintiff Edward Morales (“Plaintiff’ or “Morales”), pro se, commenced the instant action against Defendants State of New York; State University of New York (“SUNY”); State University of New York, Binghamton College (“SUNY Bingham-ton”); State University of New York, Purchase College (“SUNY Purchase”); Thomas Schwarz, President of SUNY Purchase; Melis

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHNSON, Senior District Judge: This case comes before the Court on a motion to amend the complaint and on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Jean-Robert and Edith SainL-Jean, Felix and Yantil Saintil, Linda Commodore, Felipe Howell, and Jean and Beverly Small, (the “Plaintiffs”), homeowners and former homeowners who refinanced mortgages, received financing, or had related financial deal

DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court, in this pro se employment discrimination action filed by Margo Carris (“Plaintiff’) against First Student, Inc. (“Defendant”) are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs motion for leave to file and serve an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2) (Dkt. No. 25); and (2) Defendant’s cross-motion to d