Cases

COMBS, J.: T1 Ada Electric Cars, LLC (Plaintiff/Appellant) filed this lawsuit against Thomas Kemp Jr., Jerry Johnson, Dawn Cash, and Rick Miller (collectively, Defendants/Appel-lees), members of the Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC), in their individual capacities, in response to the OTC's denial of a statutory tax credit for certain models of Tomberlin low-speed electric vehicles (LSVs) sold by the Appellant to its customers. T

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TRACY ALLEN HAMPTON, AKA No. 19-99005 Tracy A. Hampton, D.C. No. 2:14-cv- Petitioner-Appellant, 02504-ROS v. OPINION DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal f

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN W. NOBLE 417 SOUTH STATE STREET VICE CHANCELLOR DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 TELEPHONE: (302) 739-4397 FACSIMILE: (302) 739-6179

Cite as 2020 Ark. 344 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-20-291 Opinion Delivered: October 29, 2020 ALFONZO HAMPTON APPEAL FROM THE BRADLEY APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 06CR-17-6] V. HONORABLE SA

*528WALTERS, J. In this case, plaintiff was injured while working at defendant’s mill. When plaintiff was released to return to work, defendant refused to reinstate him as required by ORS 659A.043, falsely asserting that he was a “safety risk.” A jury awarded plaintiff lost wages of $6,000 and punitive damages of $175,000. On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the p

Hall, Presiding Judge. Defendant in a personal injury action appeals from the judgment and from the denial of his motion for a new trial. Plaintiff was driving his pickup truck with his wife and children as passengers. As he approached a bend in the road, a large rock flew into his windshield, breaking it and injuring him in the eye. Plaintiff, his wife and sons testified that a blue and black car was just adjacent to the truck t

This matter is before this court upon the appeal of Norma Nye, administrator, appellant, from the May 2, 1994 judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which directed a verdict in favor of defendants Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, Inc. ("PAW") and Ohio District Council of Pentecostal Churches, Inc. ("ODC"). The facts of this case are as follows: On January 4, *Page 132 1991, Leroy Kemp, Jr., an Elder of PAW, collided with a police

FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel BAP Appeal No. 25-15 Docket No. 38 Filed: 05/19/2026 Page: 1 ofof15 the Tenth Circuit

FENNER, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The rule requiring strict construction of criminal statutes is not to be applied inflexibly to override all other considerations. State v. Daugherty, 744 S.W.2d 849, 852 (Mo.App.1988). While the use of the word “shall” in a statute will generally be interpreted as mandatory, such is not always the case. State v

Johnson, Judge. United Parking, Inc., hired Norred & Associates, Inc., to investigate employees suspected of stealing money from United. Norred investigators questioned United employee Paul Hampton regarding the alleged thefts. Hampton then sued Norred and others, claiming, among other things, he was falsely imprisoned during the questioning and is entitled to punitive damages and attorney fees. The trial court granted s

PER CURIAM. In these cases, the orders and decrees entered below will be reversed and the cases will be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Robert Page Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of Roanoke, Virginia et al., 57 S.Ct. 556, 81 L.Ed. — . Reversed.

WELBORN, Commissioner. Proceeding under Section 195.145, RSMo 1978, for forfeiture of motor vehicle used to transport heroin. Trial court entered judgment of forfeiture. Vehicle owner appeals, contending that Section 195.145 is unconstitutional. At approximately 3:51 A.M. on April 21, 1978, in the City of St. Louis, a white 1974 Oldsmobile sedan was being driven north on Union Boulevard, approaching that

244 Ga. 361 (1979) 260 S.E.2d 73 HOPPER v. HAMPTON. 35177. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted August 30, 1979. Decided September 26, 1979. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, G. Stephen Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Thomas J. Killeen, for appellee. UNDERCOFLER, Presiding Justi

Ellis, J. — McDonald R. Kemp and' wife by warranty deed dated October 20,1916, conveyed certain lots to Mary S. Paine. The deed contained a covenant that the premises were free from all incumbrances and liens of every nature and kind whatsoever, including taxes, and that the grantors were lawfully seized in fee simple of the premises. In order to secure to the grantor the payment of part of the puchase price of the lots Mary S. P

48 F.3d 1508 63 USLW 2581 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Christopher Lee ARMSTRONG, aka: Chris Armstrong, Defendant,andRobert Rozelle; Aaron Hampton; Freddie Mack; SheltonAuntwan Martin, Defendants-Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Christopher Lee ARMSTRONG, aka: Chris Armstrong, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-50031, 93-

Appellant, a partnership composed of L. E. and R. M. Whitham, sued appellees on paving certificates issued to it by the city of San Angelo for paving the street in front of appellees' property in said city and for a foreclosure of their paving lien. Appellees defended only against foreclosure of the lien on the ground that said property was their homestead. Trial was to the court, who found, after a hearing, that all of said property was appellees' homestead, denied appellant a foreclosure of

The bill sets forth that Joseph Kemp died in the year 1821, having first made and published in writing a last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate by the proper authority, and the executors therein having refused to qualify as such, William Kemp was appointed administrator with the will annexed. In the said will the testator bequeathed as follows: "I give and bequeath to my son William Kemp my negroes Dorcas and Ruth during his natural life, and at his death to his oldest la

Stone, J., filed the following dissenting opinion: I am unable to agree with the majority of the Court upon the principal question involved in this case. I think, as a mailer of law, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover damages for the cancer which she claims was the result of the injury she received on the road of the defendant. In the view that I take of the matter, it makes no difference whether

221 F.Supp.2d 827 (2002) John W. GERHARDT, Plaintiff, v. Alan LAZAROFF, et al., Defendants, and Lee Hampton, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Reginald Wilkinson, et al., Defendants, and John Miller, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Reginald Wilkinson, et al., Defendants. Nos. C2-95-517, C2-97-382, C2-98-275. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. Februar

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., NATERA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees DNA DIAGNOSTICS CENTER, INC., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee v. SEQUENOM, INC., SEQUENOM CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE, LLC, Defendants-Appellants ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED, Defendant ____________