Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hammons v. Saul”
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma v. Beardpublic domain
554 F.Supp. 1 (1980) The CHEYENNE-ARAPAHO TRIBES OF OKLAHOMA, Edward P. Wilson, and Jerry Levi, individual tribal members, Plaintiffs, v. Ralph BEARD, Joseph Pedro, Jr., Jaspar Washa, Saul Birdshead, Jr., and Wisdom Nibbs, Jr., Defendants. No. CIV-80-324-D. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. December 31, 1980. *2 Mark H
State v. Millerpublic domain
264 P.3d 461 (2011) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Saul Arthur MILLER, Appellant. No. 99,232. Supreme Court of Kansas. October 28, 2011. *465 Shawn E. Minihan, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Ellen H. Mitchell, county attorney, argued the cause, and Steve Six, attorn
People v. LANDAVERDEpublic domain
† Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts 1., 2. and 4. of the Discussion. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] OPINION INTRODUCTION Appellant Saul Alberto Landaverde appeals from his conviction of contin
Cunney v. Patrick Communications, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM James K. Bredar, United States District Judge John J. Cunney (“Plaintiff’), a citizen of Connecticut, brought an action in diversity 1 against Patrick Communications, LLC (“PCL”), a limited liability company organized under the laws of Maryland; W. Lawrence (“Larry”) Patrick, a Maryland citizen and PCL principal; and Larry’s wife Susan Patrick, also a Maryland citizen a
State of Iowa v. Zackery Nelson Bassettpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21-0923 Filed November 2, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ZACKERY NELSON BASSETT, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Hamilton County, Amy M. Moore, Judge (Trial), James A. McGlynn, Judge (Motions). A defendant appeals his conviction for second-deg
Ellis v. Union Oil Co. of Californiapublic domain
630 P.2d 306 (1981) Euen D. ELLIS, Appellee, v. UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a corporation, Appellee, v. Gloria SAULS and Joann White, Co-Administratrices with Will Annexed of the Estate of Malinda Green, Deceased, et al., Appellants. No. 51913. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. January 20, 1981. Rehearing Denied June 22, 1981. John R. Robertso
Dye v. Choctaw Casino of Pocolapublic domain
230 P.3d 507 (2009) 2009 OK 52 Danny DYE and Pat Dye, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CHOCTAW CASINO OF POCOLA, Oklahoma, and The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Defendants/Appellees. No. 104,737. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. June 30, 2009. Rehearing Denied April 12, 2010. *508 Danie
REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL v. LINDEL FIELDSpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL, et al. v. LINDEL FIELDS, et al. REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL, et al. v. LINDEL FIELDS, et al.2025 OK 91Case Number: 123237Decided: 12/16/2025THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2025 OK 91, __ P.3d __ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
OPINION CORNELIA A. CLARK, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. An employee of an agency of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (“Metro”) was discharged after she filed complaints wi
Richie v. Sirmonspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER TERENCE KERN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on remand from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with its July 25, 2005, opinion. See Richie v. Mullin, 417 F.3d 1117, 1125 (10th Cir.2005). By Order entered April 27, 2004 (Dkt. # 55), this Court adopted and affirmed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Jud
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Kevin Young was convicted of first degree murder for shooting and killing Joseph Sutton during a robbery at the Charles Steak House (the “Steak House”). A unanimous jury sentenced him to death. He filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in federal district court in Oklahoma, seeking relief from both his conviction and sentence. The court denied Young’s petition,
Browning v. Statepublic domain
134 P.3d 816 (2006) 2006 OK CR 8 Michael Allen BROWNING, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. D-2003-363. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. April 24, 2006. Robert J. Stubblefield, Tulsa, OK, Attorney for Defendant at trial. Doug E. Drummond, Steve Kunzweiler, Assistant District Attorneys, Tulsa, OK, Attorneys for the Stat
Young v. Sirmonspublic domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PU BL ISH May 15, 2007 UNITED STATES COURT O F APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Weisberger v. Home Insurance Companiespublic domain
Appellant, Donald D. Weisberger, brought suit against Milton J. Guth, alleging that they were co-counsel in a wrongful death action in which Guth held the proceeds and paid the beneficiaries but never paid appellant. Appellee, Home Insurance Company, was also a defendant in appellant's action, as Guth's insurer on his legal malpractice insurance policy. A judgment was entered in which "the parties" agreed that there had been a trust agreement between appellant and Guth and that therefore Guth
State of Connecticut Office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities v. Hartford Board of Educationpublic domain
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises the question of whether the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (“PAI-MI”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 10801-10851 (2000),1 *233the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (“DD Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 15001-15115 (2000), and the Protection and Advocacy of I
Opinion by Judge Rogers, The claimants in these consolidated unemployment compensation cases were discharged from their employment with the Hygrade Food Products Corporation for violating a company rule against theft. The Office of Employment Security, a referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review all decided that the claimants were ineligible on
Richio v. Miami-Dade Countypublic domain
163 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2001) Isel RICHIO, Plaintiff, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant. No. 00CV1406. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 4, 2001. *1353 *1354 *1355 Leslie Holland, Coral Gables, FL, for plaintiff. William X. Candela, Dade Cou
State Of Connecticut Office Of Protection And Advocacy For Persons With Disabilities v. Hartford Board Of Educationpublic domain
464 F.3d 229 STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES and James McGaughey, Executive Director, State of Connecticut, Office of Protection & Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.HARTFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Hartford Public Schools and Robert Henry, Supt. of Schools, Defendants-Appellants.Docket No. 05-1240 CV. United States Court of Appeals
Cabot v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION LYDON, Senior Judge: Plaintiffs, Lewis P. Cabot (Cabot) and Daniel J. Quinn (Quinn), bring this suit to recover refunds of payments made by them towards penalties assessed against each of them, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672(a), for failure to withhold and pay over the federal employment payroll taxes, totaling $167,-529.60, of Rolair Systems, Inc. (Rolair), for the second, third, and fou
Bauch v. Kahnpublic domain
K. E. Bauch, D. M. Hardy, J. M. Cloud, and Saul Lebenson, appellants, instituted this suit in the district court of Wichita county, Tex., seeking an injunction against the appellees, Mrs. Minnie Kahn, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Alex Kahn, deceased, Mrs. Hammon and her husband, W. H. Hammon, and Thelma, Ruth, and Donnald Kahn. On December 24, 1923, on an ex parte hearing, the appellants secured a temporary restraining order. On February 24, 1924, on a final hearing bef