Cases

790 F.Supp.2d 1368 (2011) Marcie HAMILTON and Jamie Brojanac, all on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Wendell HALL, in his official capacity as Sheriff for Santa Rosa County, Florida, Defendant. Case No. 3:10cv355/MCR/EMT. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. June 10, 2011.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Sher, J.), dated March 11, 2015, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Rosa Ferazzoli did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident. <

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered July 14, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision which denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to re

SELLERS, Justice. This Court granted Bobby Saarinen and Chris Williams permission to appeal, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R. App. P., from an interlocutory order of the Franklin Circuit Court denying their motion for a summary judgment in Louis Hall's personal-injury action against them. In May 2014, Hall was injured while operating a power saw at his place of employment, a plant owned by Williams Manufacturing, Inc. ("W

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant R and B Drywall Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Asher, J.), dated November 6, 2015, as denied its motion to vacate its default in opposing the separate motions of the plaintiff and the defendants Adriatic Development Corp. and Half Hollow Construction Co., LLC, to strike its a

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Toñita Louise Hall appeals the district court’s order dismissing her several civil claims against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.* See Hall v. Mueller

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered December 2, 1994, which, in an action for legal malpractice, granted defendant’s motion, and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs. In the late 1970’s, defendant appeared as counsel of record in an action that was assigned to plaintiff in December 1981. Although defendant transferred all case files to plaintiffs attorney in Ja

233 Kan. 880 (1983) 667 P.2d 350 ROBERT L. HALL and JAMES W. HALL and NINA L. HALL, Husband and Wife, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. BEVERLY J. HAMILTON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. 55,004 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 15, 1983. Kenneth P. Soden, of Soden & Isenhour, P.A., of Mission, argued the cause, and Willia

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Gertrude Coretta Fennell Hamilton, proceeding pro se, appeals from a judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants and enjoining Hamilton from filing new actions in the Southern District of New York concerning her previous employment with Dayco Incorporated, or concerning Dayco’s New York bankruptcy action. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the und

In an action, inter alia, to recover on a promissory note, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 23, 2014, which, after a nonjury trial and upon a decision by the same court (Neckles, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated April 29, 2014, is in favor of the plaintiff *915 and against them in

*300Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Renicka Hall was convicted, following a bench trial before a magistrate judge, of one count of driving under the influence, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1) (2011), and one count of operating a vehicle wi

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated April 27, 2012, as granted those branches of the defendant/ third-party plaintiff’s cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6), and denied her

615 S.E.2d 239 (2005) 273 Ga. App. 435 GUOTH v. HAMILTON et al. No. A05A0822. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 25, 2005. *240 Anthony A. Rowell, Thomas M. Burke, Jr., Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, Tifton, for appellant. Judy H. Varnell, Albany, Carl G. Fulp III, Fulp & Holt, Valdosta, for app

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher A. Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(e)(1) (2006). A certific

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jimmy Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of a

PER CURIAM: Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Watson, No. 6:06-cv-03110-RBH, 2007 WL 1447755 (D.S.C. May 11, 2007). Hall’s motion for p

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gary Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

608 F.3d 340 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shamonte HALL and Karinder Gordon, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 09-2682, 09-2470. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 22, 2010. Decided June 17, 2010. *341 Kenneth Yeadon, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney,

911 N.E.2d 26 (2009) PAYDAY TODAY, INC., Edward R. Hall, Appellants-Defendants, v. Maria L. HAMILTON, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 71A03-0805-CV-255. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 20, 2009. *28 Edward R. Hall, Merrillville, IN, Attorney for Appellants. *29 Judith Fox, South Bend, IN, Att

KAHN, J. In this wind insurance claim case, a jury awarded policy limits to the Hamiltons, whose mobile home was destroyed by Hurricane Ivan. Appellant Citizens Property Insurance Corp. (Citizens) raises numerous points; we focus upon the following: (1) the exclusion of evidence that flooding caused the total loss of the insured properties, including evidence that the Hamiltons also had a flood insurance policy from which they