Cases

Kristine G. Baker, United States District Court Judge Before the Court is defendants iPawn Rodney Parham, LLC ("iPawn Rodney Parham"), iPawn Baseline, LLC ("iPawn Baseline"), iPawn Arkansas, Inc. ("iPawn Arkansas"), and Steve Landers Jr.'s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 44). Plaintiffs Vincient Jones and Alrick Powell responded in opposition (Dkt. No. 53), and defendants replied (Dkt. No. 57). Defendants also filed two supple

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jun 10 2020, 9:08 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

OPINION FRIEDLANDER, Judge. Joel and Ruby Bowden, Golden Companies, Inc., and Golden Purchasing and Staffing, Inc. (collectively referred to as the Bowdens) appeal a multi-million-dollar judgment entered against them and in favor of E.J. Agnew and Golden-AGI, LLC (collectively referred to as Agnew). The Bowdens present the following restated and reordere

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any May 23 2019, 9:09 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeal

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge Plaintiffs, eleven deaf or hard of hearing prisoners, brought this proposed class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Defendant Salvador A. Godinez, the Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC” or the “Department”). Plaintiffs allege that IDOC has denied them hearing accommodat

Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on HANKOOK TIRE COMPANY LIMITED'S AND HANKOOK TIRE AMERICA COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 62). The Court previously denied Defendants' motion in its ORDER (ECF No. 221) dated November 27, 2017. The following Memorandum Opinion sets out the reasoning for having done so. I. BACKGROUND

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Friedman, Chaney and Raphael Argued by videoconference RACHEL DODSON, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0518-24-4 JUDGE FRANK K. FRIEDMAN MARCH 18, 2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ A&D AUTO SALES, INC., ALLEY’S OF KINGSPORT, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER JEEP WEST, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC., ARCHER DODGE, INC., ARCHER FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC., AXELROD CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP, INC., AXELROD CHRYSLER, INC., BARRY DODGE INC., BENNETT AUTOPLEX INC., BENSON MOTOR INC., ARROW FORD, INC., BILL KAY SUZUKI, INC., BOARDWALK AUTO CENTER, INC., BOB LUEGERS MOTORS, INC., BO

249 S.W.3d 301 (2008) Bill WALKER et al. v. SUNRISE PONTIAC-GMC TRUCK, INC. No. W2006-01162-SC-S09-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. November 13, 2007 Session. February 13, 2008. George T. Lewis, III and Kristine L. Roberts, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Sunrise Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. Gary K. Smith, C. Wesley Fowler, and J

DYK, Circuit Judge. These appeals arise from two takings suits related to the 2009 bankruptcies of General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and Chrysler LLC (“Chrysler”). The plaintiffs are former dealers of those companies whose franchises were terminated in the bankruptcies. The plaintiffs allege that these terminations constituted a taking because the government required them as a condition of its providing financial assistance