Cases

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM SEEKING PENALTIES UNDER THE CALIFORNIA PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ACT, Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2698 et seq. WITHOUT PREJUDICE MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge. On August 29, 2013, Plaintiffs Logan Halliwell and Aaron Sleichter (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against Defendant A-T Solutions (“Defendant”) alleging violations of state and federal labor laws during t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Collision Communications, Inc. v. Civil No. 20-cv-949-LM Opinion No. 2025 DNH 011 P Nokia Solutions and Networks OY ORDER Plaintiff Collision Communications, Inc. (“Collision”) brought this diversity action against defendant Nokia Solutions and Networks OY

[Cite as Aungst v. Light, 2020-Ohio-3347.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) JOSANNE AUNGST C.A. No. 29349 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE MARK S. LIGHT, et a

ORDER DENYING KINSALE’á MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION THERETO ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause comes before the Court pursuant to Kinsale’s Renewed .Motion for Summary Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 70) (the “Summary Judgment Motion”) filed by the Defendant, Kinsale Insurance Company (the “Defenda

Bennigson v Solomon R. Guggenheim Found. (2024 NY Slip Op 24164) [*1] Bennigson v Solomon R. Guggenheim Found. 2024 NY Slip Op 24164 Decided on June 6, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Borrok, J. Publis

Bennigson v Solomon R. Guggenheim Found. (2024 NY Slip Op 24164) [*1] Bennigson v Solomon R. Guggenheim Found. 2024 NY Slip Op 24164 Decided on June 6, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Borrok, J. Publis

MEMORANDUM OPINION G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED , STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This case was referred to this Court for all purposes. Currently ripe is Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification of a collective action under the D.C. Minimum Wage Revision Act (“DCMWRA”), D.C. Code § 32-1001 et seq. After reviewing the entire record,

OPINION OF THE COURT Vito M. DeStefano, J. In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants/third-party plaintiffs, New York State Urban Development Corporation, doing business as Empire State Development Corporation (UDC), and Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (DASNY), move for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212 granting them summary judgment dismissing the amend

Brady Farr appeals the Montgomery Circuit Court's judgment entering summary judgments in favor of The Gulf Agency, Inc. ("Gulf Agency"), Orange Beach Insurance Agency, *Page 2 Inc. ("Orange Beach"), 1 and Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the insurance companies"). We affirm the trial court's judgment in part and reverse it in part.

Re: ECF No. 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Nike Retail Services, Inc. removed this action from the Alameda County Superior Court on diversity jurisdiction grounds. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff Payal Patel now moves to remand it. ECF No. 12. At issue is whether the federal “amount in controversy” r

669 F.3d 78 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TWENTY MILJAM-350 IED JAMMERS, Defendant-in-rem, Alon Wallach, Claimant-Appellant. Docket No. 10-1781-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: April 13, 2011. Decided: December 22, 2011. *80 Jesse M. Furman, Assistant Unite

906 So.2d 182 (2005) J.W.J., Jr. v. P.K.R. and P.H.R. 2030304. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. January 14, 2005. *183 Linda F. Coats, Huntsville, for appellant. Maureen K. Cooper of Morris, Conchin, Cooper & King, Huntsville, for appellees. *184 On Application

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Following trial, the district court found officers and directors with voting control of a closely held family corporation, Ny-man Manufacturing Co., to be in breach of their state law fiduciary duties to minority shareholders whose shares the three had caused the corporation to redeem without making adequate disclosures. Robert Ny-man, Kenneth Nyman, and Keit

OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge. Plaintiff Fres Oquendo, a professional boxer, brings this state law action for breach of contract against Defendant CCC Terek, a German company that promotes prizefights. The parties’ dispute centers around a bout for the World Boxing Association’s (“WBA”) world heavyweight championship held in Grozny, Chechnya on July 6, 2014. Oquendo lost the fi

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 14 JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Andrew Achal, a former employee of Gate Gourmet, filed his First Amended -Complaint in federal court *790against Defendants Gate Gourmet, Inc. (“Gate Gourmet

USCA1 Opinion November 18, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-1186 NEW HAMPSHIRE-VERMONT HEALTH SERVICE CORPORATION

846 So.2d 486 (2003) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Kelvin M. JACKSON, Respondent. Department of Revenue, Petitioner, v. Morgan P. Tillery, Respondent. Nos. SC01-913, SC01-914. Supreme Court of Florida. April 24, 2003. *488 Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney Gener

244 F.3d 114 (2nd Cir. 2001) VKK CORPORATION, VKK PATRIOTS, INC. and VICTOR K. KIAM, II, Plaintiffs Counter Defendants Appellants,- v. -NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, B & B HOLDINGS, INC., THE FIVE SMITHS, INC., BUFFALO BILLS, INC., THE CHICAGO BEARS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC., CINCINNATI BENGALS, INC., CLEVELAND BROWNS FOOTBALL CO., DALLAS COWBOYS FOOTBALL, INC., PDB SPORTS INC., THE DETROIT LIONS, INC., THE GREEN BAY PACKERS, INC., HOUSTON OILERS

SACK, Circuit Judge: On November 16, 1994, plaintiff Victor K. Kiam, II (“Kiam”), and two entities through which he controlled the New England Patriots, brought suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the National Football League (the “NFL”), twenty-two of its member clubs (with the NFL, collectively the “NFL defendants”), and two entities involved in the ultimately successful c

898 A.2d 590 (2006) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, and Pennsylvania Department of State, v. UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, Certainteed Corporation, Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc., Chemrex, Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Advance Transformer Company, and Monsanto Company. Appeal of