Cases

In an action to foreclosure a mortgage, the defendants Don Balsamo and Janet L. Balsamo appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered November 4, 2015, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them for lack of personal jurisdiction. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs,

107 F.Supp.2d 333 (2000) Carriene NEVIN, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 00 CIV. 0029(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 28, 2000. *334 *335 *336 *337 Barbara Lerman, White Plain

937 N.E.2d 237 (2010) Louis MANIEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIBANK, F.S.B., Harbor Drive Condominium Association, Unknown Owners and Nonrecord Claimants, Defendants (Masayo Koshiyama and Robert Jolly, Defendants-Appellees). No. 1-09-0583. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. September 20, 2010. *240 Cind

FIRST DIVISION September 20, 2010 No. 1-09-0583 LOUIS MANIEZ, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Cook County. ) v. ) ) CITIBANK, F.S.B., HARBOR DRIVE ) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ) No. 05 CH 20618 UNKNOWN OWNERS and NONRECORD ) CLAIMANTS, ) )

801 F.Supp. 270 (1992) Michael B. TIKKANEN, and all others similarly situated, Barry Rosenberg, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs. v. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., MBNA American Bank, N.A., f/k/a MBNA America, N.A., Defendants. Michelle NELSON, and all others similarly situated, Janis Ideson, and all others similarly situated, Donald Lauer, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., Fir

794 F.Supp. 312 (1992) Michelle NELSON, and all others similarly situated, Janis Ideson, and all others similarly situated, Donald Lauer, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., First National Bank of Omaha, Bank One, Columbus, N.A., MBNA American Bank, N.A. f/k/a MBNA America, N.A., Defendants. Michael B. TIKKANEN, and all others similarly situated, Barry Rosenberg, and all others similarly situated, P

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS BETH BLOOM, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs Dwight Wilson, Jesus A. Avelar-Lemus, Jessie Cross and Mattie Cross’ (“Plaintiffs”) Class Action Complaint, ECF No. [1] (the “Complaint”), filed by Defendants Ever-Bank and Everhome Mortgage (together, “EverBank” and EverBank’s

OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Alfred R. Kloss and Diana C. Kloss commenced this case against Defendant RBS Citizens N.A., succ

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, APPLICATION FOR SERVICE AWARDS, AND CLASS COUNSEL’S APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES FEDERICO A. MORENO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, Application for Service Awards, and Class Counsel’s Application for Attorney’s Fees

OPINION OF THE COURT Lewis R. Friedman, J. After years of study, passage of several bills by the House of Representatives and extensive hearings, in 1988 Congress adopted the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA or the Act) (29 USC § 2001 et seq., Pub L 100-347). The statute as *253finally enacted was the outgrowth of a series of congre

457 F.Supp.2d 82 (2006) Douglas S. BROWN, Stephen Kawelti and James A. Prosser, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-10713-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 17, 2006. *84 Cathleen M. Combs, Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin, LLC, Chicago, IL, Christopher M. Lefebvre

33 F.Supp.2d 1041 (1998) VIDEO TRAX, INC., a Florida corporation on behalf of itself and all other persons and entities similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NATIONSBANK, N.A., a national banking association, Defendant. No. 97-1586-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. December 10, 1998. *1042

WIEAND, Judge, dissenting: The issue in this appeal is whether Pennsylvania law may invalidate fees charged to a credit card holder residing in Pennsylvania, where the credit card was issued by a national bank located in Ohio, under whose law such charges are deemed lawful interest. A majority of the Court, after care*130fully considering this issue, conc

TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in part VII of the majority’s opinion affirming the district court’s judgment in favor of appellee First Alabama Bank against appellant Johnson & Higgins. The remainder of the majority opinion, however, troubles me. Under the guise of Alabama’s law of fraud, the majority, in a

899 F.2d 1045 FIRST ALABAMA BANK OF MONTGOMERY, N.A.,Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., a corporation andCameron and Colby Company, Incorporated, a/k/aCameron and Colby Co., Incorporated, aMassachusetts corporation,Defendants-Appellants,Johnson & Higgins of Georgia, Inc., a corporation, 1st St.Ins. & Cameron & Colby,Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

PER CURIAM: We affirm the District Court’s judgment of September 23, 2013, granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss because, as the District Court stated, plaintiff failed to file a response contesting the motions. Doc. 10. AFFIRMED.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Velasquez, J.), dated June 30, 2016, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is grante

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHANIE V. BUTRON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24 - 2735 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan HOWARD LUTNICK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Stephanie Butron, a former employee of

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligent hiring, supervision, and retention, etc., the defendants Pentecostal Assembly, Inc., Angel L. Roman, Sr., and Luis Serrano appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated February 6, 2012, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 which was, in effect, to preclude them from offering testimony at tri

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligent hiring, supervision, and retention, etc., the defendants Pentecostal Assembly, Inc., Angel L. Roman, Sr., and Luis Serrano appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated February 6, 2012, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 which was, in effect, to preclude them from offering testimony at tri