Cases

SARASOTA, CCM, INC. * NO. 2023-CA-0658 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME QUALITY * TRANSPORT, LLC AND FOURTH CIRCUIT JACQUE DENET * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

FRANK, Judge. Bill Sprague appeals from the final summary judgment granted P.I.A. of Sarasota and we reverse for the reason that the action was voluntarily dismissed prior to the trial court hearing the motion. On October 20, 1989, Bill Sprague filed an action for wrongful discharge against his former employer, P.I.A. It moved for summary judgment on August 28, 1991, and a hearing was scheduled for Sep

*1105ante, p. 825; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 991; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 854; ante, p. 865; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 877;

LaROSE, Judge. Discount Fireworks of Central Florida,' Inc. (Discount), sued Sarasota County (County) seeking to determine its rights under the County’s fireworks ordinance. The trial court entered, and Discount appeals from, an order granting the County’s summary judgment motion. The order lacks language of finality that would make it a final, appealable order. See Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co.,

[Cite as Key Realty, Ltd. v. Hall, 2021-Ohio-1908.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Key Realty, Ltd. Court of Appeals No. L-19-1237 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201901132 v. Michael Hall, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT A

[Cite as Key Realty, Ltd. v. Hall, 2021-Ohio-1868.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Key Realty, Ltd. Court of Appeals No. L-19-1237 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201901132 v. Michael Hall, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT A

PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant challenges an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying his motion for “medical-only” attorney’s fees, payable by the Employer/Carrier (E/C) as provided for in section 440.34(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2012). We affirm. The parties agree that the E/C conceded Claimant’s entitlement to the benefits claimed in Claimant’s petition for be

[Cite as Key Realty, Ltd. v. Hall, 2021-Ohio-26.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Key Realty, Ltd. Court of Appeals No. L-19-1237 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201901132 v. Michael Hall, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellees

VAN NORTWICK, J. In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying Claimant his choice of doctor to serve as the “one-time change” of physician to which he is entitled under section 440.13(2)(f), Florida Statutes (2012). Claimant argues the JCC erred in inter*940preting that statute to permit the Employer/C

PER CURIAM. Based on Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 122 So.3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Westphal. Id. at 448. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981). We do not reach the issue of reclassification of benefits, because such is premature in this case. See Q

JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs sued various local government defendants (“Defendants”), claiming unjust enrichment and seeking disgorgement of traffic fines Plaintiffs allege were imposed in violation of Florida law. Defendants moved to dismiss the claim, asserting sovereign immunity. The district court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and Defendants now appeal. After a careful review of

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KELLIANNE NASO, as personal representative of the Estate of Allan Dwoskin, Appellant, v. RONALD HALL and G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA) INC., Appellees. No. 4D21-1521 [May 4, 2022] Appeal from the Circ

PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant challenges an order entered by the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) granting the Employer/Carrier’s (E/C) motion to “enforce” a settlement agreement reached at mediation. Because Claimant failed to'preserve any error concerning the competency of the evidence, we affirm the JCC’s finding that Claimant knowingly and voluntarily settled all indemnity and medical benefit

VILLANTI, Judge. Lisa Williams, as personal representative of the estate of Robert Williams, appeals the trial court’s order granting Gaf-fin Industrial Services, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. Because the trial court considered matters outside the four corners of the complaint when it granted the motion to dismiss, we reverse. We also note that, even if dismissal had been appropriate, the trial cou

AGEE, Circuit Judge: Patrick Gerard Carson filed a qui tam suit on behalf of the United States and several states under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) and the state equivalents, claiming that his employer, HCR Manor Care, and related companies, Manor Care, Inc. and Heartland Employment Services, LLC, (collectively, “Manor Care”) were ov-erbilling the respective governments for medical services. Carson included a separate claim o

MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge: I The Appellants, parents and guardians of three female students, brought suit against the Sarasota County School Board (the “Board”) alleging that their children had been the victims of sexual harassment by another student in the girls’ second grade class. The complaint includes a claim under Title IX of the Education Am

*450ORDER RICHARD M. GERGEL, District Judge. Defendant RGL Forensic, Inc. (RGL) has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Dkt. No. 21.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND This case involves an insurance coverage dispute between Plaintiff T

5 So.3d 793 (2009) JAMES DEPAUL ENTERPRISES, INC. and The Hartford Protocol Communications, Inc., Appellants, v. James CAVANA, Appellee. No. 1D09-0379. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 31, 2009. Cindy R. Galen of Eraclides, Johns, Hall, Gelman, Johannessen & Goodman, L.L.P., Sarasota, for Appellants. Bill B. Berke, Cape Coral, fo

982 So.2d 1196 (2008) Wendall HALL, Appellant, v. Officer KNIPP, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee. No. 1D07-0843. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 21, 2008. *1197 Wendall Hall, pro se, Appellant. Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Bill McCollum, Attorn

PER CURIAM. Dennis Whitaker, the claimant below, challenges a workers’ compensation order which denies indemnity benefits on the ground that the claimant voluntarily left his job. For the reasons that follow, we affirm, in part, and reverse, in part, and remand for further proceedings. Whitaker, a truck driver, slipped while making a delivery on February 17, 2005. Although North American Tank Lines, Inc.,