Cases

Faye Hall sued Dolgencorp, Inc. ("Dolgencorp"), which owns and operates Dollar General Store discount stores, alleging negligence and wantonness after the contents of a bottle of liquid drain cleaner spilled onto her face from a shelf in the Dollar General Store in Marion. At trial, at the close of Hall's case-in-chief, Dolgencorp filed a motion for a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") as to Hall's negligence and wantonness claims. The trial court granted Dolgencorp's motion as to th

MURDOCK, Justice. Dolgencorp, LLC (“Dolgencorp”), appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in the amount of $100,000 in favor of Michelle Spence in her action filed in the Autauga Circuit Court seeking damages arising from her arrest for shoplifting. We reverse and remand. I. Facts The evidence at trial showed the following. On April 16, 2013, Spence went to the Dollar General dis

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: When a Winn-Dixie supermarket signs on to anchor a shopping center, its lease often contains a restrictive covenant sharply limiting grocery sales by other tenants. In this complex lawsuit, Winn-Dixie claimed that, since 2005, it suffered more than $90 million in lost profits because Defendants Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Big Lots violated, and contin

Case: 12-14527 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 72 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 12-14527; 12-14742; 12-14825 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 9:11-cv-80601-DMM, 9:11-cv-80638-DMM WINN-DIXIE

03/26/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 22, 2018 Session LEQUITA NIX HILLIARD v. DOLGENCORP, LLC Appeal from the Chancery Court for Polk County No. 2015-CV-22 Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor No. E2018-00312-COA-R3-CV Lequita

NUMBER 13-17-00425-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DANIEL MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. D/B/A DOLLAR GENERAL, Appellee. On appeal from the 332nd District Court

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed June 14, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01209-CV WILLIE CHAPPLE, Appellant V. BOBBY HALL AND YOLANDA HALL, Appellees On Appeal from the 134

</

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-013-CV LAURA HALL SOLOMON APPELLANT V.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-013-CV LAURA HALL SOLOMON APPELLANT V. T & M CONTRACTORS, INC. APPELLEE D/B/A T & M CONSTRUCTION ------------ FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT CO

PARKER, Justice. *235Conecuh Timber, Inc., Ayres Forestry, Inc., BAR Forest Products, LLC, Dry Creek Loggers, Inc., Pea River Timber Company, Inc., Pineville Timber Co., LLC, and THE Timber Company, LLC (sometimes referred to as "TTC") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the wood dealers"), sued Alabama River Group, Inc. ("ARG"), and ARG'

PARKER, Justice. *235Conecuh Timber, Inc., Ayres Forestry, Inc., BAR Forest Products, LLC, Dry Creek Loggers, Inc., Pea River Timber Company, Inc., Pineville Timber Co., LLC, and THE Timber Company, LLC (sometimes referred to as "TTC") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the wood dealers"), sued Alabama River Group, Inc. ("ARG"), and ARG'

[Cite as Norman v. Tri-Arch, Inc., 2018-Ohio-5270.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) JASMINE NORMAN C.A. No. 18CA011295 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTE

NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge. After Michael Booth started working at a Nissan factory in Tennessee, he injured his neck and sought medical treatment. Booth's physician recommended several work restrictions, including that he not reach above his head or flex his neck too much, but the restrictions did not sideline Booth. Indeed, he continued to work on the assembly line for about a decade w

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00281-CV INDUSTRIAL MODELS, INC. APPELLANT V. SNF, INC. D/B/A BRAND FX BODY APPELLEE COMPANY ---------- FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 20, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00484-CV CHLOE’S CONCEPTS, LLC, ROBERT CONNER AND SARAH CONNER, Appellants V. CLEAR RAINBOW, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

788 F.Supp.2d 253 (2011) Ricardo COPANTITLA, Diego Diaz De La Vega, Ignacio Garcia, Freddy Guachun, Julio Lantigua, Manuel Lizandro, Martin Lopez, Sebastian Lopez, Augustin Maldonado, Henry Matute, Joelito Melendez, Aussencio Ramirez, and Jose Luis Vargas, Plaintiffs, v. FISKARDO ESTIATORIO, INC. d/b/a Thalassa Restaurant, George Makris, Julia Makris, Steve Makris, and Fantis Foods, Inc., Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 1608(RJH).</

795 F.Supp.2d 1269 (2011) Karen COOK, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. Case No. 1:10-CV-574-WKW. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. June 16, 2011. *1270 Joseph Earl Sawyer, Jr., Je Sawyer, Jr., Attorney at Law, Enterprise, AL, for Plaintiff. Ahnri Leronne Riddick-Seals, Carr Allis

Affirm in part; Reverse in part; Remand; Opinion Filed February 8, 2013. In The (Euurt of Appeals Ifliffli Eistrirt of (Texas at Ballets No. 05-11-01150-CV B&R DEVELOPMENT, INC., Appellant V. HCBECK, LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-00819-M MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang Opinion By Justice Moseley B&R Development, Inc. (B&R) files a restricted appeal of an adverse no—answer default

Justice HECHT, joined by Justice JOHNSON, dissenting. The rule in Texas is that a possessor of land discharges his duty to protect an entrant from a condition that poses an unreasonable risk of harm by giving an adequate warning.1 Now the Court tells us that “in some circumstances” no warning can be adequate. Which ones, exactly, the Court does not specify, saying only that Bradley