Cases

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

APPENDIX A1. Order of January 6, 2015 Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for PartialFILED Summary IN Judgment (CR 1:119). 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs, Bich-Ha Henriette Rieffel and Marc A. Rieffel, appeal from the summary judgment rendered on their complaint in favor of the defendants, Penelope D. Johnston-Foote, Rayh Foote, also known as Ray Foote, Diane Jones, Michael B. Jones, Dan Tredwell, Lucinda Tredwell, Sue Baker, Attorney Daniel W. Moger, Jr., Daniel W. Moger, LLC, the Penelope Johnston-Foote Fam

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge *1180Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 8), filed by Defendant Slide Fire Solutions, LP ("Slide Fire"). Plaintiffs Devon Prescott, Brooke Freeman, and Tasaneeporn Upright (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed a Response, (ECF No. 17), and Slide Fire filed a Reply, (ECF No. 22). For the reasons discussed herein, Slid

676 F.Supp.2d 179 (2009) L & L WINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARCO-DESTIN, INC., 1000 Highway 98 East Corp., Panama Surf & Sport, Inc., and E & T, Inc., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 4137(BSJ)(GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 16, 2009. *182 Bennett David Krasner, The Law Offices of Bennett D. Krasner

Filed 8/11/16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA MARK LAFFITTE et al., ) ) Plaintiffs and Respondents, ) ) S222996 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/7 B249253 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC., ) et al., ) )

400 F.Supp.2d 541 (2005) ESTATE OF YARON UNGAR, et al., Plaintiffs/Judgment-Creditors, v. The PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants/Judgment-Debtors. No. 18MS0302(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 7, 2005. *543 David J. Strachman, McIntyre, Tate, Lynch & Holt, Providence, RI, Robert J. Tolchin, Ne

ORDER AND REASONS JAY C. ZAINEY, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 31) filed by plaintiff Plaquemines Parish, on its own behalf and on behalf of the State of Louisiana. De.fendants oppose the motion.1 The Parish filed its reply and counsel orally argued the motion on July 2, 2014. (Rec. Docs. 55 & 64). The Court ordered supplemental

702 F.Supp.2d 667 (2010) Gene P. BONVILLAIN, in his capacity as Assessor for the Parish of Terrebonne, State of Louisiana v. LOUISIANA LAND & EXPLORATION CO., et al. Civil Action Nos. 09-3540, 09-3541, 09-5781, 09-5782, 09-5783, 09-5784, 09-5787, 09-5789, 09-5790, 09-5793, 09-5795, 09-5802, 09-5803. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. March 29, 2010. <

Michael F. Urbanski, Chief United States District Judge This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss, ECF No. 13, plaintiff Marc Edwards' Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9, filed by defendants Paul Schwartz, Yanna Lambrinidou, and Melissa Mays (hereinafter, collectively, "defendants"), pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of personal jurisdiction and failure to

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join virtually all of Chief Judge Bris-coe’s thorough, persuasive opinion. But, I respectfully dissent on Part IV(A)(2). There, the majority rejects the Petitioners’ challenge to the sufficiency of the budget for the Universal Service Fund. On this limited issue, I respectfully dissent. In my view, the FC

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 2, 2011 Session STEVEN RAY THACKER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dyer County No. C00-54 Allen Wallace, Senior Judge No. W2010-01637-CCA-R3-PD - Filed March 23, 2012 A Lake County jury convicted the Petitioner, Steven Ray Thacker, of first degree murder and sentenced h

416 B.R. 801 (2009) In re ELECTRIC MACHINERY ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. Electric Machinery Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc., The Clark Construction Group, Inc., and Construct Two Construction Managers, Inc., individually and as joint venturers trading as Hunt/Clark/Construct Two, a Joint Venture, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 8:03-bk-11047-MGW. Adversary No. 8:03-ap-00811-MGW.

ACCEPTED 06-15-00013-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/16/2015 4:49:55 PM

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS