Cases

PER CURIAM. We reverse the order on appeal for the reasons discussed in our opinion in City of Miami v. Jones, 593 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied. JOANOS, C.J., and KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

107 F.Supp.2d 1230 (2000) Joseph HADDAD, Plaintiff, v. Scott E. WALL, Defendant. No. EDCV98-0130 RTVAPX. United States District Court, C.D. California. August 8, 2000. E. Thomas Barham, Jr., Shirley A. Ostrow, Law Offices of Barham and Ostrow, Los Alamitos, CA, for plaintiff. *1231 Bruce E. Disenhouse, Kinkle, Rodiger and

Shearn, J.: The plaintiffs claim the full value of four cases and two bales of oriental rugs shipped to them at New York in October, 1915, from San Francisco, Cal., and destroyed by fire en route. The cause of the fire is not known. The tariff rates for shipment of rugs “ were dependent upon the value of the property shipped, as stated in writing by the shipper.” The tariff further provided that a shipment

Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal we address the municipal court practice known as the “civil reservation.” A civil reservation permits the municipal court judge, at the request of a defendant, to order that a guilty plea shall not be evidential in any related civil proceeding. Here, def

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered on or about July 22, 2016, which granted plaintiff’s motion to confirm the report of a special referee, made after a traverse hearing, concluding that service was properly made, and denied defendant’s cross motion to reject the report and dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, with costs. </

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered May 23, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc.’s (Con Ed) and third-party defendants Nico Asphalt, Inc.’s (Nico) and Roadway Contracting, Inc.’s (Roadway) motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against Con Ed and denied plaintiff’s cross motion

Shanklin v Wilhelmina Models, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 03732) Shanklin v Wilhelmina Models, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 03732 Decided on May 24, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting

White v Bajwa (2018 NY Slip Op 03246) White v Bajwa 2018 NY Slip Op 03246 Decided on May 4, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Case: 22-1138 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETFLIX, INC., Appellant v. DIVX, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1138 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Paten

Case: 22-1138 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETFLIX, INC., Appellant v. DIVX, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1138 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Paten

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ...499 II. Procedural History ...500 *499III. Jurisdiction And Venue ...500 IV. Findings of Fact ...500

140 F.Supp.2d 204 (2001) Lorenzo ROMAINE, Plaintiff, v. Boyce RAWSON, Defendant. No. 99-CV-0603(LEK/DRH). United States District Court, N.D. New York. April 17, 2001. *205 *206 *207 Lawrence A. Goldberg, Gordon, Goldberg Law Firm, New York City, Paul A. Shn

OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT O. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge. In the instant action, Plaintiffs Shelley and Joe Federico (“Plaintiffs”) seek to sue Defendants Lincoln Military Housing LLC (“LMH”), Mid-Atlantic Military Family Communities LLC (“Mid-Atlantic”), LPC Property Management, Inc. (“LPC”) (collectively “Defendants”), and John Doe for alleged personal injury and property damages. Plaintiffs

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. Painting the Mackinac Bridge is an enormous, labor-intensive task, but it must be done with regularity. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) outsources that project by means of a *886sealed bid meth

2016 WI 53 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2756 COMPLETE TITLE: David M. Marks, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent- Petitioner, v. Houston Casualty Company, Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant,

MARK A. PIZZO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This is a breach of franchise agreement case involving a Maryland-based chicken wing franchise (Defendant franchisor Cluck-U Corp. and its sole shareholder, Defendant Pierre Haddad), a franchisee's attempt at a Florida location (Plaintiff Cluck-U Chicken, Inc. and its owner, Anthony Tartaglia), and the undoing of their business relationship. The parties have litigated in Maryland, where

LETTS, Judge. The appellant, by interlocutory appeal, here protests the action of the trial court in sustaining objections to propounded interrogatories. We affirm. The propounded interrogatories are composed of 2,300 legal size pages in small type1 (without excessive space between *80questions) and include such choice s

Marshall, CJ. We consider in this case whether two consumers who rented motor vehicles from the defendants, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, Inc., and Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company (collectively Enterprise), have stated a claim under G. L. c. 93A, § 9 (1), which permits an action by any person who has been “injured” by another’s unfair or deceptive act or practice. The rental customers contend that the collision damage wa

119 Ariz. 268 (1978) 580 P.2d 729 Albert STERMAN and Brenda Sterman, husband and wife, William R. Fasse and Marsha S. Fasse, husband and wife and all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Arizona Title Insurance and Trust Company, an Arizona Corporation, Lawyers Title of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation, Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, a Californi