Cases

MEMORANDUM **** Plaintiff-appellant Kenneth Huff appeals the district court’s ruling affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) determination that Huff was not entitled to Social Security disability benefits. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our decision. We review de novo the district court’s decision affirmi

57 F.3d 1069NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. James HUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-3460. United States Court of

548 F.3d 417 (2008) Dineen JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-5876. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: October 28, 2008. Decided and Filed: November 25, 2008. *418 ON BRIEF: Janice E. Barnes-Williams, Office of the General Counsel, So

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0425p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - DIN

DUGGAN, J. The petitioner, Emily Huff, appeals a final decision of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Administrative Appeals Unit (AAU). The AAU concluded that special needs trust distributions function as income for purposes of Medicaid eligibility. We vacate and remand. The following facts were found by the AAU or are uncontested. The petitioner is a disabled, young woman. On February 2

169 F.Supp.2d 1318 (2001) Helen HUFF, Plaintiff, v. William A. HALTER,[1] Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 00-0665-CB-M. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 2, 2001. Byron A. Lassiter, Booker & Lassiter, P.C., Mobile, AL, for plaintiff. Patricia Nicole Beyer, U.S. Attorney's Office,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 47] and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 51].1 For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part and Defendant’s motion is

103 F.Supp.2d 621 (2000) Kenneth WEISMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Secretary of the Treasury, Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-CV-5302(DGT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 30, 2000. *622 Kenneth Weisman, Auburndale, NY, pro se. *623 Departme

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. This case raises many issues concerning the legality and eventual vacating of a settlement agreement entered into by the plaintiffs and the Community Services Administration (CSA). I. Suit was initiated on September 24, 1979 by eight individuals and Gray Panthers of Chicago, an unincorporated non-profit organization, as a class action. The complaint

Lynch, President: The defendant was convicted in the intermediate court of Kanawha county,' ñned and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail, under an indictment charging a violation of §1, ch. 32, Code 1906. Of that judgment he now complains. He demurred to the indictment and moved to quash it, but does not point out any defect in it, and we perceive none. It charges that on October 8, 1910, without

400 F.Supp. 249 (1975) Emmett PLAYER et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PENSIONS AND SECURITY et al., Defendants, United States of America, Amicus Curiae. Civ. A. No. 3835-N. United States District Court, M. D. Alabama, N. D. August 8, 1975. *250 *251

Jackson, Judge. Whilst Wm. A. Huff was mayor of the city of Macon and ex-officio president of council, he leased the city park for five years, paying in advance so much per annum therefor, and agreed to erect certain levies, build and repair fences, grade and gravel walks, and to put and keep the park in repair, and to cut and furnish wood to the poor from what is called the new park, for the sum of three thousand

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge: The underlying issue in this case is whether a non-U.S. citizen applying for disability benefits under the Social Security Act has satisfied an exception to the general rule that alien beneficiaries cannot receive benefits if they have resided outside the United States for six co

118 F.Supp.2d 9 (2000) Velma J. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 99:0898JRJMF. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 30, 2000. *10 Velma J. Martin, Washington, DC, pro se. Jeffrey Stuart Gutman, George Washington University Law

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Joseph M. Hood, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court upon the Acting Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 30] Counts I, II, III, IV, V and VI of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has filed a Response [DE 42], stating his objections to the Motion, and the Acting Commissioner

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT Danny C. Reeves, United States District Judge These matters are pending for consideration of Defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s, motions to dismiss in part. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Notices entered in each case, the motions to dismiss in part were converted to motions for summary

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER SAYLOR, District Judge. This is an appeal from the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying the application of plaintiff Randall B. Vautour for Social Security Disability Benefits (“SSDI”). The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) essentially determined that when plaintiff w

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. Cynthia Orienti seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 403(d)(2), and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Act 4

KONDUROS, J. In this workers’ compensation case, 5 Star Transportation appeals the Appellate Panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s awarding benefits to Emily Thomas as George W. Thomas’s putative or common law spouse. 5 Star contends the Appellate Panel erred in finding George’s injuries arose out of and in the course and scope of his employment because he suffered an aneurysm. 5 Star also maintains the Appellate Pan

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HUFF, District Judge. Plaintiff Terry Eugene Marler appeals the decision of the Administrative Law Judge who denied his application for Social Security Income Benefits. Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security, opposes plaintiffs request for summary judgment and urges affirmance of the decision