⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “HU v. MAYORKAS”

Bouarfa v. Mayorkaspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-12-10 · Published · cited 61× · 604 U.S. 6; 145 S. Ct. 24; 220 L. Ed. 2d 245
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Namarra v. Mayorkaspublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013-02-20 · Published · cited 3× · 924 F. Supp. 2d 1058; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23031; 2013 WL 619777
ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. This is an immigration lawsuit brought by Plaintiffs Elizabeth Namarra (“Elizabeth”), Ephraim Olani (“Olani”), and Aster Namarra (“Aster”), against Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services (“USCIS”) and Defendant Janet Napolitano in her official capacity as the Secretary of the Department of H
District Court, D. Oregon · 2010-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 715 F. Supp. 2d 1165; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53522; 2010 WL 2175995
715 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2010) Secundino BAEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America; Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security of the United States; Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS Director; Christina Poulos, Director, USCIS California Service Center; Eric Holder, United States Attorney General, Defendants. No. CV-09-662-HU. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Rural Development Innovations Limited, e¢ al., v, Pete Marocco, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-1631 (RJL) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION $4 July ) , 2025 [Dkt. #7] This case is the second challenge to President Trump’s efforts to reduce the functions of the United States African Development Foundation (““USADF”), a small federal agency that invests directly into African enterprises. Plaintiffs Rural Development Inno
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-21 · Published · cited 7× · 602 U.S. 899
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-21 · Published · cited 71× · 602 U.S. 899
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 899–942 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 6, 2025 Decided May 22, 2026 No. 24-7068 LUIS JAIME CASTILLO BUTTERS, APPELLANT v. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND MARCIA MCNUTT, APPELLEES Consolidated with 25-7001 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Distri
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 602 U.S. 899
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 25-14065 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 05/06/2026 Page: 1 of 110 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-14065 ____________________ FIDENCIO HERNANDEZ ALVAREZ, Pet