Cases

751 A.2d 559 (2000) 164 N.J. 74 Samuel A. VENTOLA and Josephine Ventola, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY VETERAN'S MEMORIAL HOME, Paramus, New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued January 18, 2000. Decided June 5, 2000. Craig W. Alexander, West Orange, for plaintiffs-appellants (Mandelbaum, Salsburg

PER CURIAM. This" case involves a transitional application of the principles recently announced in Lowe v. Zarghami, 158 N.J. 606, 731 A.2d 14 (1999) that govern the late notice of tort claims against public entity health-care providers under the Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 12-3. The Appellate Division decided this ease on May 24, 1999, fourteen days before our decision in Lowe.<

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This is a contract dispute between Teragram Corporation and Marketwatch.com, Inc., a.k.a. “ScreamingMedia.” 1 The dispute centers on three software products, referred to collectively as “the Teragram Software,” which Teragram licensed to ScreamingMedia. The first two products, (1) Entity Extraction, SD

5 F.Supp.2d 57 (1998) DUNKIN' DONUTS INCORPORATED v. Michael PANAGAKOS, et al. Civil Action No. 96-11040-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 8, 1998. *58 Stephen Horn, Robert L. Zisk, Steven A. Browne, Robert A. Murphy, Joan M. Griffin, Casner & Edwards, Boston, MA, J. Thomas Esslinger, Jeremy M. Griffin,

1 2024 CO 67 Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc. and Jack Phillips, Petitioners v. Autumn Scardina, Respondent No. 23SC116Supreme Court of Colorado, En BancOctober 8, 2024 Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Case No. 21CA1142

In consolidated actions for a divorce and ancillary relief, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), entered August 8, 1989, which denied the appellant’s motion to fix its compensation in accordance with its retainer agreement and for a charging lien in the amount so fixed. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. We agree with the appellant’s contention that had it completed it

Opinion of the Court SULLIVAN, Chief Judge: On July 29, 1992, this Court issued an opinion in this case (34 MJ 319, 324) setting aside the decision of the Court of Military Review (32 MJ 567 (1991)) and remanding *449the record to that court for further review. On January 15, 1993, the Court of Military Review issued a second opinion in

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

377 Mass. 552 (1979) 387 N.E.2d 527 COMMONWEALTH vs. JOSEPH MEEHAN. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. December 5, 1978. March 19, 1979. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., BRAUCHER, KAPLAN, LIACOS, & ABRAMS, JJ. Sandra Hamlin, Assistant District Attorney (Paul A. Mishkin, Special Assistant District Attorney, wit

210 F.Supp. 873 (1962) UNITED STATES of America v. ANACONDA AMERICAN BRASS COMPANY et al. Cr. No. 10725. United States District Court D. Connecticut. November 20, 1962. John J. Galgay, Donald Ferguson, Edwin Weiss, Ralph S. Goodman, Ronald E. Somner, Bernard Mindich, Dept. of Justice, New York City, for plaintiff. Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, by Wal

294 S.W.2d 666 (1956) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jack BALLARD, Appellant. No. 29410. St. Louis Court of Appeals. Missouri. October 16, 1956. *668 F. Neil Aschemeyer, Richard L. Daly, St. Louis, for appellant. William J. Geekie, Pros. Atty., Sidney Faber, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Louis, for respondent. GEORGE P.