Cases

242 N.W.2d 889 (1976) 196 Neb. 367 SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GERING IN the COUNTY OF SCOTTS BLUFF in the State of Nebraska, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Donald C. STANNARD et al., Appellees, Impleaded with School District No. 8 of Scotts Bluff County, Appellant, Lockwood Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Intervener-Appellant. No. 40495. Supr

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN RE ESTATE OF HOWARD NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). IN RE ESTATE OF ROBERT EUGENE HOWARD, DECEASED. JUDY FORRESTOR, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE,

494 N.W.2d 99 (1993) 242 Neb. 150 Lloyd HOWARD and Joy Howard, as Mother and next friend of Kathryn Howard, Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEBRASKA, Appellee. No. S-89-1452. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 8, 1993. *101 Robert W. Mullin, of Van Steenberg, Chaloupka, Mullin, Holyoke, Pahlke, Sm

DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. The primary issue in this appeal is whether the absolute litigation privilege may immunize a party to a non-disparagement agreement from liability for breaching that agreement when the breach was by words spoken by a lawyer or witness in court, during a judicial proceeding. We hold that it may, and that in the circumstances of this case it did, as a matter of

van Gestel, Allan, J. This matter comes before the Court on a Joint Motion for Impoundment, Paper #4. What the plaintiff, Howard L. Carr (“Carr”), and defendant, Entercom Boston, LLC (“Entercom”), seek to have this Court impound, separate from the rest of the case file, and keep beyond the reach of the press and public is Exhibit A attached to the Complaint. The document they seek to hide from view is Carr’s em

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREEDMAN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Throughout the early 1980s, beavers living in Pittsfield’s Ashley Reservoir infected the water supply with a pathogenic virus known as giardiasis lambía. Fourteen persons, the plaintiffs in the instant action, claim that the virus caused them to become ill and suffer personal injuries. Accordingly, they have filed a lawsuit for injunctive

436 N.W.2d 151 (1989) 231 Neb. 288 COMMERCE SAVINGS SCOTTSBLUFF, INC., Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. F.H. SCHAFER ELEVATOR, INC., Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 87-305. Supreme Court of Nebraska. February 24, 1989. *155 David C. Nuttleman, of Holtorf, Kovarik, Nuttleman, Ellison, Mathis & Javoron

van Gestel, Allan, J. This matter is before the Court on Entercom’s Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Paper #24. By this motion the defendant and plaintiff-in-counterclaim, Entercom Boston, LLC (“En-tercom”), seeks to prevent the defendant-in-counterclaim Greater Boston Radio, Inc. (“GBR”) “from (i) discussing with Howard L. Carr . . . (’Carr’) or his agents the possibility of hiring . . . Carr to act as a broadcaster

679 Argued and submitted March 15, 2019, reversed and remanded August 5, 2020 In the Matter of the Compensation of Justin A. Swint, Claimant. Justin A. SWINT, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board 1701519; A1

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

MEMORANDUM BENSON EVERETT LEGG, District Judge. I. Introduction This action arises under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et *477seq. PC Construction Co. f/k/a Pizzagalli Construction Co. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America (collectively “Petitioners”) seek an order comp

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Presiding Judge. C & M Bail Bonding Company (C & M) posted a $5,000 bond to secure the presence of Gregory L. Siemens for trial on criminal charges. The court ordered the bond forfeited when Mi'. Siemens failed to appear at the time set by the court for hearing of the matter, and later entered judgment on the forfeiture despite the fact that C & M showed that Mr. Siemens was arrested

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A24-0787 Court of Appeals Procaccini, J. Took no part, Hudson, C.J., Gaïtas, J. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Respondent, vs. Fi

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. DETWILER NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

78 P.3d 1081 (2003) 206 Ariz. 360 BRAKE MASTERS SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Ken K. GABBAY, a married man, Defendant/Appellant. No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0067. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, Department A. November 12, 2003. *1083 Robert A. Fortuno, P.C., By Robert A. For

16 Neb. App. 288 SANTOS A. VILLANUEVA, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF SOUTH SIOUX CITY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, APPELLEE. No. A-06-321. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Filed January 8, 2008. Steven H. Howard, of Dowd, Howard & Corrigan, L.L.C., for appellant. Thomas J. Culhane, of Erickson & Sederstrom, P.C., for appellee. INBODY, Chief Judge, and CARLSO

526 N.W.2d 668 (1995) 247 Neb. 350 TRI-COUNTY LANDFILL, INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SIOUX COUNTY, Nebraska, Appellee. No. S-93-1010. Supreme Court of Nebraska. February 3, 1995. *669 Howard P. Olsen, Jr., and Robert G. Simmons, Jr., of Simmons, Olsen, Ediger & Selzer, P.C., Sco

Keith Bradford, et al. v. Maryland State Board of Education, No. 209, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Eyler, Deborah S., J. MARYLAND CONSTITUTION - - ARTICLE VIII RIGHT OF CHILDREN TO THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT FREE EDUCATION - - CONSENT DECREE - - FINAL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES AS THEY EXISTED WHEN SUIT WAS FILED AND WITHIN SCOPE OF CONTINUATION OF JURISDICTION AS CONTEMPLATED BY LANGUAGE OF CONSENT DECREE. In 1994, parents of several Baltimore City schoolchildren (the “Bradford Plaintiffs

- 495 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 291 Nebraska R eports HAMILTON CTY. EMS ASSN. v. HAMILTON CTY. Cite as 291 Neb. 495 H amilton County EMS Association, IAFF Local 4956, appellee, v. H amilton County, Nebraska, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___

Keith Bradford, et al. v. Maryland State Board of Education, No. 209, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Eyler, Deborah S., J. MARYLAND CONSTITUTION - - ARTICLE VIII RIGHT OF CHILDREN TO THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT FREE EDUCATION - - CONSENT DECREE - - FINAL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES AS THEY EXISTED WHEN SUIT WAS FILED AND WITHIN SCOPE OF CONTINUATION OF JURISDICTION AS CONTEMPLATED BY LANGUAGE OF CONSENT DECREE. In 1994, parents of several Baltimore City schoolchildren (the “Bradford Plaintiffs