Cases

management of his finances. Albert created GWB Trust into which any interest he may have held in the Estate could be funneled. He then created Renhaw, Inc., and Pentex FILED IN Royalty Trust, 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS int

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v

369 F.Supp. 38 (1973) Harry H. and Thelma GIBBS et al. v. William A. TITELMAN, Individually and as Director of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. Civ. A. No. 72-2165. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. November 8, 1973. *39 *40

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. In this proceeding we consider eleven 1 consolidated appeals arising out of cases decided under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. Ten different substantive issues are presented, in varying combinations, in these cases.

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

25 B.R. 406 (1982) In re Mattie MITCHELL, Debtor. Mattie MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. FINANCE ONE OF AMERICA, Defendant. In re Donald W. HALL and Lucile E. Hall, Debtors. Donald W. HALL Lucile E. Hall, Plaintiffs, v. FINANCE ONE, Defendant. In re James S. PERROW and Roby H. Perrow, Debtors. James S. PERROW Roby H. Perrow, Plaintiffs, v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. In re Henry W. MILLS, Jr. and Mari

855 F.2d 1188 27 ERC 1985, 55 USLW 2719, 11Fed.R.Serv.3d 213,18 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,978, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,404,26 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1037 Woodrow STERLING, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-6087. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 8, 1987.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Before us is an appeal by plaintiff Chrysler Corporation from the district court’s order holding unconstitutional the New Jersey lis pendens statute, N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2A:15-6 et seg., and granting defendants’ motion to vacate a notice of lis pend

698 F.2d 1295 76 A.L.R.Fed. 1, 1983-1 Trade Cases 65,241 INGRAM CORPORATION and Ingram Contractors, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., INC., Oceanic Contractors, Inc.,Charles L. Graves, Robert K. Richie and James E.Cunningham, Defendants-Appellants. No. 82-3119. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.

530 F.2d 66 Barbara GIRARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.94TH STREET AND FIFTH AVENUE CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 372, Docket 75--7443. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Oct. 1, 1975.Decided Jan. 13, 1976.Certiorari Denied May 19, 1976.See 96 S.Ct. 2173. O. John Rogge

GEE, Circuit Judge: Taxpayer appeals from a judgment of the United States Tax Court which found deficiencies in its income tax. W. S. Badcock Corp., 59 T.C. 272 (1972). Involved are returns for its tax years ending in 1964 1 and 1966-68, aggregate additional taxes exceeding seven hundred thousand dollars, and somethin

135 F.Supp. 176 (1955) William S. SPEED et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant. Jack FRIEDMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant. Philip ZAHN, suing individually and on behalf of all similarly situated holders of Class A Common Stock of Axton-Fisher Tobacco Company, Plaintiff, v. TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 480, 468, 490.

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief District Judge: In this appeal we examine golden parachutes 1 and corporate control from an insurance law perspective. A Florida corporation’s board of directors adopted golden parachutes for several key executives. After change in corporate control opened the parachutes, a disgruntled shareholder instituted a derivative action, alleging that the parachute payments were

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge. Thorp Credit Inc. of Illinois appeals from two lower court judgments imposing liability for violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. The questions presented in both appeals are identical: was the district court correct in concluding that Thorp violated the Act by failing to reveal o

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The publisher of the Globe-Democrat brought this action seeking to enjoin the Commissioners of the Board of Police from denying access to arrest records and police reports. 1 In Counts I and II, Globe claims that these records and reports should be available to their reporters pursuant to the “S

647 F.2d 727 UPTOWN PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES BOARD OFDIRECTORS, an Illinois not- for-profitCorporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COOK COUNTY and the County ofCook, Defendants-Appellants,v.Patricia Roberts HARRIS, in her capacity as Secretary of theDepartment of Health and Human Services,* Defendant-Appellee.

James P. Jones, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, a business corporation and its president, allege in this case that defendant Teresa B. Barringer was a long-time company employee in charge of the company's finances and a fiduciary of the company's retirement plan. It is claimed that she engaged in a fraudulent scheme to embezzle money from the company and pay portions of it into her own retirement account, as well as to