Cases

312 B.R. 699 (2004) Sheldon GUETLING and Julie Guetling, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. 3:04-cv-219-J-16MCR. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. July 20, 2004. *700 Amiee R. Buckman, Yardley D. Buckman, II,

196 B.R. 429 (1996) In re Lyndell D. JACOBS, Patricia A. Jacobs, Debtors. HOUSEHOLD CREDIT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Lyndell D. JACOBS, Patricia A. Jacobs, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 94-32449-RKR. Adv. No. 95-3012. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. May 20, 1996. *430 Robert S. Cooper, Roch

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GILMAN, J., joined. EDGAR, Chief District Judge (pp. 351-53), delivered a separate opinion dissenting in part and concurring in part. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Sharon R. Pfennig, appeals from the district court’s September 1, 2000 order dismissing her complaint in which she seeks to bring a class action against Defend

*525AMENDED OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Sharon R. Pfennig, appeals from the district court’s September 1, 2000 order dismissing her complaint in which she seeks to bring a class action against Defendants, Household Credit Services, Inc. (“Household”) and MBNA America Bank, N.A. (“MBNA”), for alleged violations of the federal Truth in Lendi

*427 ORDER DE MENT, District Judge. This cause is now presented to the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed April 1, 1997, Defendants’ objections thereto, filed April 14, 1997, Plaintiffs’ objections thereto, filed April 14,1997, Plaintiffs’ renewed objection thereto, filed January 9, 1998, and the various supplemental

953 F.Supp. 1370 (1996) Shelly PERRY, etc., Plaintiff, v. HOUSEHOLD RETAIL SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-D-45-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. August 5, 1996. *1371 C. Knox McLaney, III, Angela L. Kimbrough, McLaney & Associates, Montgomery, AL, James O. Latturner, Ed

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE 05/28/2025 AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 3, 2025 CORY RANDOLPH COX v. REBECCA LYNNE THUMM COX Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 09-CV-23413 Deanna B. Johnson, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2024-00827-COA-R3-

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DARRIN P. GAYLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 109] ("Motion"). The Court referred this action to Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis pursuant to

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This case is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [7, 9]. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Cox Enterprises, Inc.’s motion will be granted. I. Background A. The Long-Term Disability Benefit Plan Plaintiff Yolonda Smith seeks to recover long-term

FILED IN 1ST COURT OFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS In The OCT 0 5 2015 Court of Appeals CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE For The CLERK

61 So.3d 927 (2011) Suzanne B. COX, Appellant v. Lawrence A. COX, Jr., Appellee. No. 2009-CA-01233-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. January 25, 2011. Rehearing Denied May 24, 2011. *929 Carolyn Buttles Mills, Ridgeland, Deborah H. Bell, Jerry L. Mills, Ridgeland, attorneys for appellant. William R. Wr

*963Memorandum Opinion Liam O’Grady, United States District Judge This case presents the question of whether a conduit internet service provider may be held liable for the infringing activity of its subscribers based on the uploading and downloading of copyrighted musical works using' BitTorrent, a peer-to-peer file sharing network. The plaintiff i

MEMORANDUM OPINION Liam O’Grady, United States District Judge In this copyright action, the putative owners of more than 1,400 musical composition • copyrights seek to hold Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Com, LLC (collectively, “Cox”) eontributorily and vicariously liable for alleged copyright infringement taking place over its high-speed internet service. At the close of extensive discovery, the parties c

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Opinion by Wm. C. Hetherington, Jr., Chief Judge: T1 AAAA Wrecker (Wrecker) appeals the denial of its motions for new trial, for summary judgment, and for settlement of the journal entry and enlargement of time. The trial court entered the judgment in favor of Tinker Federal Credit Union (TFPCU) following summary proceedings.1 In that judgment, the trial court found that Wrecker's

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NOLAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs have filed this securities fraud class action alleging that Defendants Household International, Inc., Household Finance Corporation, and certain individuals (collectively, “Household”) engaged in predatory lending practices between July 30, 1999 and October 11, 2002 (the “Class Period”). Currently before the court ar

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendant ITT Educational Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 15], filed on April 28, 2014 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.

Leach, J. ¶1 This case presents the question of whether a borrower/grantor waives any claims against a lender/ beneficiary arising out of an obligation secured by a deed of trust by failing to request a preliminary injunction or restraining order enjoining a nonjudicial foreclosure sale at least five days before the sale date. We hold that a borrower waives these claims by failing to timely request this relief before the foreclos

243 B.R. 713 (2000) In re Victor COX, Debtor. Fidelity Financial Services, Plaintiff, v. Victor Cox, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 99 B 2291. Adversary No. 99 A 0628. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 28, 2000. *714 *715 Steven J. Fink, Steven J. Fink &am;

Decision Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment GUY R. HUMPHREY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction This decision concerns three separate issues arising out of an adversary proceeding filed within the debtors’ Chapter 13 bankruptcy case: 1) whether the debtors can bifurcate a resident