Cases

393 F.Supp.2d 295 (2005) Victor ZAVALA; Eunice Gomez; Antonio Flores; Octavio Denisio; Hipolito Palacios; Carlos Alberto Tello; Maximiliano Mendez; Arturo Zavala; Filipe Condado; Luis Gutierrez; Daniel Antonio Cruz; Petr Zednek; Teresa Jaros; Jiri Pfauser; Hana Pfauserova; Pavel Kunc; and Martin Macak, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A.03-530

TACHA, Circuit Judge. The district court found that it has jurisdiction to hear Homeland Stores’ claims against the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”). The court then certified for interlocutory appeal and the RTC now appeals the district court’s ruling. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and affirm. I. Background

Case: 20-30196 Document: 00516111210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 18-P-218 Appeals Court ROSA LAYES1 & another2 vs.

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta

KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction This case arises out of a train derailment that occurred near Hyndman, Pennsylvania in August 2017. Plaintiff Denora Diehl ("Plaintiff") filed a Class Action Complaint alleging that Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. ("Defendant") negligently operated its train, causing it to derail. Plaintiff avers that she and other proposed class members

FILED 15-0674 11/16/2015 2:17:39 PM tex-7866695 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DR. RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an Nos. 14-16161 individual, 14-17272 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:06-cv-545- WHA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELA

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Abdulrahman Alharbi is a twenty-three-year-old student from Saudi Ara*340bia, who resides in Revere, Massachusetts. He was a spectator at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013, was injured in the bombing, and was questioned by federal authorities investigating the e

WATERMAN, Justice. In this appeal, we must decide whether the district court correctly denied an employer’s motion for new. trial following a $1.4 million jury verdict for the plaintiff on claims under the Iowa Civil Rights Act (ICRA) for employment discrimination *562based on sexual harassment by a direct supervisor and coemployees. The employer argues the district c

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CSL PLASMA INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-2360 (TSC) UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, et al., Defendants. HECTOR AMAYA., et al., Plaintiffs, v.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: Defendants, Sturm Foods, Inc., and its parent company Treehouse Foods, Inc., manufactured single-serve coffee cups for use in Keurig machines and marketed them under the name Grove Square Coffee (“GSC”). The eight named Plaintiffs each purchased GSC, but were extremely unsatisfied with their purchase. They claim that Defendants packaged, marketed, distrib

Mark A. Barnett, Judge Pending before the court are three motions in limine. Two of the motions were filed by Defendant Univar USA Inc. ("Defendant" or "Univar"), both of which the United States ("Plaintiff" or "the Government") opposes. Def. Univar USA Inc.'s Mot. in Limine No. 1 (Tables Provided by Taiwan Customs) ("Def.'s First Mot. i

MEMORANDUM OPINION WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“R & R”) (Doc. No. 81) making the following recommendations; 1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 58) filed by Defendants Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc. and Russell MacDonnell (“RRMS Defendants”) shoul

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 8-415C Filed: May 25, 2017 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC., * * Plaintiff, * v. * Contract; Breach; Good Faith and *

THOMPSON, J. *101In this case we consider whether certain restrictions applicable to noncommercial speech and expressive activities at two large outdoor retail centers owned by defendant and respondent The Irvine Company, LLC (Defendant) are constitutional under the free speech protections established in article I, section 2 of the California C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOVEDADES Y SERVICIOS, No. 25-4238 INC.; ESPERANZA GOMEZ D.C. No. ESCOBAR, 3:25-cv-00886- JLS-DDL Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. OPINION FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK; ANDREA GACKI

J. Brett Busby, Justice Appellees Richard Cuevas, Daniel Cuevas, Guadalupe Torres, Luis de los Santos, and Blake Smith, and decedent Nicolas Oscar Cuevas (Nico), were employees of J. V. Industrial Companies, Ltd. (JVIC) working as boilermakers during a turnaround at the Memphis, Tennessee refinery owned and operated by Valero Energy Corporation and Valero Refining Company-Tennessee, L.L.C. (collectively

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN PRESTON BAILEY, District Judge. I. Introduction Pending before this Court is the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants American Public Education, Inc., Wallace E. Boston, Jr., and Harry T. Wilkins [Doc. 59], which was filed on March 10, 2011. Following an extended briefing period, the plaintiffs filed their response in opposition [