Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

OPINION PER CURIAM. Lou Marra Hogg’s1 appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey that dismissed her complaint against the State of New Jersey, Department of Labor and Division of Workers’ Compensation. We will affirm the District Court’s judgment. I. Hogg’s was injured on the job, and filed a

OPINION PER CURIAM. Lou Marra Hogg’s1 appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey that dismissed her complaint against the State of New Jersey, Department of Labor and Division of Workers’ Compensation. We will affirm the District Court’s judgment. I. Hogg’s was injured on the job, and filed a

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The State, on behalf of Kathleen Roye, appeals from a judgment denying a child support order. We reverse and remand. Kathleen Roye Hogg and Kenneth Shannon Hogg were divorced in 1992. The divorce judgment awarded them joint custody of their four children, but the children's primary residence was with the father. The judgment stated that the court did not order any child support because of the disparity between the parties' incomes and the fact that the mother was enrolled in sc

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-1175 Filed November 23, 2021 ROBERT M. HOGG and KATHRYN A. HOGG, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. CITY COUNCIL OF CEDAR RAPIDS, Defendant-Appellee, and PROTECT THE PRAIRIE PARK CORRIDOR, INC., an Iowa Nonprofit Membership Corporation, JEREMIAH KENNY, RONALD LIPPE, MICHAEL NOKE, LOUWANNA MORRIS, JOHN SCHRINER, and KERRY SANDERS, Intervenors-Appellants, and CARGIL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1350 Filed December 18, 2024 ROBERT M. HOGG and KATHRYN A. HOGG, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. CITY COUNCIL OF CEDAR RAPIDS, Defendant-Appellee, PROTECT THE PRAIRIE PARK CORRIDOR, INC., JEREMIAH KENNY, RONALD LIPPE, MICHAEL NOKE, LOUWANNA MORRIS, JOHN SCHRINER, and KERRY SANDERS, Intervenors-Appellants, and CARGILL, INC., Intervenor. ____________

OPINION SHARON G. LEE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ., joined. The defendant was convicted of multiple counts of especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, criminal exposure of another

Cliii F JiisUCF i.is MA Ii CMtD1vN Wilillili Ci.i KR l))I11I.CfltlRi ii SI wi s chec’ 5th hcoufts.Lo DAV1I) I.. I3RIHuiS . /, Moi IV FRANFIS

J.D.W. ("the child") was placed in the custody of the Houston County Department of Human Resources ("DHR") by a July 5, 2001, order of the trial court shortly after she was born on June 27, 2001. Following a hearing on November 20, 2001, the trial court determined that the child was dependent. On May 16, 2002, DHR filed a petition seeking to terminate the parental rights of J.W. ("the father") and K.W. ("the mother") to the child. The petition indicated that the whereabouts of the mot

SAAD, P.J. Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order that denied his motion for summary disposition and granted summary disposition to defendants. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant Four Lakes Association, Inc. (Four Lakes), was established on April 30, 1968,

OPINION ROSEN, Chief District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant/Appellant Travis R. Hogg was charged in a two-count indictment with possession with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of crack cocaine and possession with intent to distribute an unspecified quantity of cocaine. On March 21, 2011, Defendant pled g

KNOLL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. hi join that portion of the majority opinion regarding plaintiffs’ actual or constructive notice. The contamination warning letters from the DEQ should have placed a reasonable person on notice of contamination on their property. With all due respect, I dissent from the majority’s discussion of the c

STONE, Judge. For the use and benefit of the division of welfare, “an integral part of the department of public health and welfare” [§ 207.-010],1 this action was instituted on May 19, 1969, in the name of the State of Missouri [Rule 52.01, V.A.M.R.; § 507.010] to recover from defendants Finis M. and Gertie A. Hogg, husband and wife, the sum of $11,040 alleged to have been the aggregate amount of o

80 So.2d 182 (1955) Herbert Richard HOGG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS OF THE STATE of Louisiana, Defendant-Appellant. No. 8268. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. April 14, 1955. *183 W. Crosby Pegues, Jr., D. Ross Banister, Philip K. Jones, Francis X. Vinet, Louis S. Quinn, Joseph D. Loret, Baton Rou

407 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2006) James L. HOGG, Plaintiff, v. FRASER SHIPYARDS, INC., Defendant. No. 05-C-253-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. January 10, 2006. *1028 *1029 *1030 Kenneth A. Knudson, Hendricks, Knudson, Gee, Torvinen & Weiby, S.

689 So.2d 131 (1996) STATE of Alabama ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, on Behalf of Kathleen ROYE v. Kenneth Shannon HOGG. 2950664. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. December 20, 1996. *132 J. Coleman Campbell and Lynn Sensabaugh Merrill, Asst. Attys. Gen., Department of Human Resources, for Appellant. Beverlye Brad

311 Md. 446 (1988) 535 A.2d 923 STATE OF MARYLAND AND STATE OF MARYLAND DEPOSIT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION v. CHARLES C. HOGG ET AL. No. 94, September Term, 1987. Court of Appeals of Maryland. January 14, 1988. Evelyn O. Cannon, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Dennis M. Sweeney, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mark D. McCurdy and Carm

PER CURIAM. Appellant, the Department of Commerce (Department), hired appellee, Arthur G. Ken-nerly, as a communications officer on September 20, 1976, and Kennerly remained an employee of the Department until dismissed on May 31, 1994. For several years prior to his dismissal, Kennerly worked in the Department’s International Trade and Development Division, and during the time period pertinent to this appeal, Kennerly wor

CRAIN, J. |2The plaintiff, Nolan Benson, doing business as Borrel’s EZ Shop, appeals a judgment sustaining an exception of prescription and dismissing his claims against the State of Louisiana, Department of Revenue, through the Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Benson seeks damages against the s