Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERIC RODNEY HILL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Civil Action No. 25-02736 (UNA) v. ) ) E. RICKARD, )

2007 WY 19 RANDY FARMER, d/b/a RANDY FARMER CONSTRUCTION, a sole proprietorship, Appellant v. EDWIN R. RICKARD and ELIZABETH A. RICKARD, Trustees under the Elizabeth A. Rickard Living Trust, Appellees. No. 06-132. Supreme Court of Wyoming. OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2006. January 31, 2007. Representing Appellant: Jay A. Gilbertz and Michael K. Davis of Yonkee & Toner, L

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RAYMOND R. ROSEBORO, Petitioner, v. Civ. Action No. 19-2355 (EGS) BARBARA RICKARD, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Mr. Raymond Roseboro (“Mr. Roseboro” or “Petitioner”) brings this petition for a w

OSCN Found Document:RICKARD v. COULIMORE RICKARD v. COULIMORE2022 OK 9Case Number: 118503Decided: 01/25/2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 9, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. Â

OSCN Found Document:RICKARD v. COULIMORE RICKARD v. COULIMORE2022 OK 9Case Number: 118503Decided: 01/25/2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 9, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. Â

OSCN Found Document:RICKARD v. COULIMORE RICKARD v. COULIMORE2022 OK 9503 P.3d 920Case Number: 118503Decided: 01/25/2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 9, 503 P.3d 920 Â KEELY D. RICKARD, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. JONATHAN P. COULIMORE a

RICKARD v. COULIMORE2022 OK 9505 P.3d 920Case Number: 118503Decided: 01/25/2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 9, 505 P.3d 920 KEELY D. RICKARD, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. JONATHAN P. COULIMORE and ELINOR COULIMORE, individually, and as Trustees under the Co

This case originates from a petition filed by Jean Rickard for the probate of the last will and testament of her mother, Isephene Jo Haggard Trousdale, and a subsequent petition filed by Gilbert Leon Trousdale, claiming to be the surviving spouse of the decedent, for his elective share, exempt property, and homestead allowance. The estate was removed to the circuit court on July 10, 1984, and proceeded to trial on the sole issue of whether a common law marriage existed between

295 S.W.3d 602 (2009) Daniel HOWELL, Respondent, v. Bruce A. RICKARD and Mark S. Rickard, Appellants. No. SD 29546. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. October 28, 2009. *603 Jacob W. Stauffer, Stauffer Law Firm, LLC, West Plains, for Appellants. Brad D. Eidson, Houston, for Respondent. ROBER

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 31 2018, 7:58 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

211 Cal.App.3d 1435 (1989) 260 Cal. Rptr. 42 CITY OF MORGAN HILL, Plaintiff and Respondent. v. CARMELLA ALBERTI et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. H003764. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. June 30, 1989. *1436 COUNSEL Marc G. Hynes for Plaintiff and Respondent. Dougl

Opinion RICKARD, P. J. Appellant was convicted of misdemeanor assault with a deadly instrument and misdemeanor battery. He appeals from *Supp. 26the order granting probation, contending that the trial court erred in instructing the jury as follows: “When a person intentionally does that which the law declares to be an offense, he is acting with cr

Berdon, J., dissenting. The majority today holds that our state courts have jurisdiction to interfere with the *583governance and leadership structure of the sovereign Indian nation known as the Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe by determining whether the person who authorized this litigation has authority to sue on behalf of the tribe.11 believe tha

420 So.2d 303 (1982) STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William M. RICKARD, Respondent. No. 54877. Supreme Court of Florida. September 30, 1982. *304 Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner. Jerry Hill, Public Defender, James R. Wulchak, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer and David A. Davis,

By the Court, Fitzgerald, J.: In the court below plaintiff, Rickard, received judgment against the defendant, Geach, for the sum of $433.93. Defendant made a motion for a new trial, and the motion was denied. Thereafter defendant appealed to this court from the said judgment and also the order denying him a new trial. Plaintiff alleged that "a mutual, open, current, running, and continuous account” existed bet

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendants in error were defendants in the trial court. The essential facts, when not stated, are necessarily presupposed by this opinion, and will therefore be understood. There was error in the sustention of the demurrer of the defendants A. H. Reed and C. E. Dawkins to the plaintiff's petition, the pertinent allegations of said petition being, in substance, as follows: (1) That these two defendants are sureties upon the bond of J. W. Chane

WELBORN, Commissioner, Appeal from judgment in divorce action, in which wife was awarded alimony in gross of $20,000, payable at the rate of $400 per month, and $2,000 attorneys’ fees. Ronald Hill and Charlotte Hill were married January 29, 1957. On October 6, 1967, the husband filed a petition for divorce in the Jackson County Circuit Court. The wife filed an answer and cross-bill. Upon a trial, the wife

699 F.Supp. 876 (1988) Joanne W. HILL, Plaintiff, v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., Defendant. No. 88-91-Civ-T-13(A). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 14, 1988. *877 Robert V. Williams, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff. Peter W. Zinober, Tampa, Fla., for defendant. ORDER GEORGE

579 S.W.2d 121 (1979) Patricia Ann HILL and Harold Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gary Paul BARTON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 38891, 38867. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. January 30, 1979. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied March 16, 1979. *124 Donald S. Hilleary, Clayton, Ke

CLARK, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Edgar Alan Rickard, d/b/a Trader Publications of Alabama (Rickard), appeals from a judgment in an unfair competition action in which the district court found that appellee, Auto Publisher, Inc. (Auto Publisher), had misappropriated appellant’s unregistered trademark and had violated a preliminary inju