Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) EDITH ANN HIGGINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-27 (RBW) ) ANDREW SAUL, in his official capacit

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00055-CR ___________________________ BRADLEY HIGGINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 271st District Court Wise County, Texas Trial Court No. CR21457 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

265 P.3d 384 (2011) In re the Matter of Tia Christine COOK, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Adam S. LOSNEGARD, Respondent/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 10-0458. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. October 18, 2011. *385 Tia Christine Cook, Gilbert, Petitioner/Appellant In Propria Persona. Gillespie, Shields & Durra

403 B.R. 537 (2009) In re Matthew Sebastian HIGGINS and Mary Ann Higgins, Appellants/Debtors, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee. No. 1:08-cv-91. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. January 16, 2009. *538 MEMORANDUM HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., District Judge. Appellants Mat

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 111.] WAMPLER, APPELLANT, v. HIGGINS, APPELLEE. [Cite as Wampler v. Higgins, 2001-Ohio-1293.] Defamation—Ohio Constitution’s separate and independent protection of opinions is not limited in its application to the allegedly defamatory statements made by media defendants—Nonmedia defendant whose allegedly defamatory statements appear in a letter to the edito

Cook, J. In Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. (1990), 497 U.S. 1, 21, 110 S.Ct. 2695, 2707, 111 L.Ed.2d 1, 19, the United States Supreme Court rejected the notion that “an additional separate constitutional privilege for ‘opinion’ is required *112to ensure the freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment” to the United States Constitution. This court lat

James Edward Welsh, Presiding Judge James Pittman appeals from the eirpuit court’s judgment dismissing his petition for damages alleging that his employer, Cook Paper Recycling Corporation, “caused the workplace to be an objectively hostile and abusive environment based on sexual preference.” The circuit court dismissed Pittman’s petition for failure to state a claim.1 Pittman con

PER CURIAM. This case arises from an incident in which defendant Joshua Tibbetts, a deputy sheriff with the Penobscot County Sheriffs Department, issued plaintiff Barry Higgins a no-trespass warning and ordered him to leave the T & N Trailer Park in Carmel, Maine. The district court granted the defendants (Tibbetts, Tibbetts’ supervisor Sheriff Glenn Ross, and the Department itself) summary judgment on Higgins’ claims that

739 F.Supp.2d 205 (2010) John MANGINO and Elaine Mangino, Plaintiffs, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, Fire Marshall John P. Poulos, Code Enforcement Officer James Nudo, Patchogue Fire Department, Fire Chief Joseph Wagoner, Unidentified Employees and Agents of the Incorporated Village of Patchogue and Unidentified Employees and Agents of the Patchogue Fire Department, Defendants. No. 06-CV-5716 (JFB) (AKT).

STROUD, Judge. The dispositive issues in this case are whether petitioners had standing to appeal to superior court the grant of a special use permit to respondent-intervenor, and whether petitioners were denied due process in the proceedings by which respondent-intervernors' application for a special use permit was granted. We hold that petitioners had standing to appeal, and that they were denied due process in the proceedings.

649 S.E.2d 458 (2007) Glenn and Jessica COOK; Charles and Geraldine Frank; George and Phyllis Hendry; Nathan and Lisa Murphy; Byron Nesbit; Kelly and Jenifer Rubottom; and Union County, a body politic and corporate of the State of North Carolina, Petitioners, v. UNION COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Respondent, and Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.; and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Intervenor Respondents. No. COA06-1

810 F.Supp. 379 (1992) Thomas LANKA, D.D.S., and Gordon L. Wright, D.D.S., as Co-Trustees of the Plans and Trusts known as Thomas Lanka, D.D.S., Gordon L. Wright, D.D.S., P.C., Employees' Pension Plan and Trust and Employees' Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, Plaintiffs, v. Michael B. O'HIGGINS, Defendant. No. 88-CV-922. United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 6, 199

SECOND DIVISION June 19, 2001 No. 1-99-2284 THEODORE PECORA and, ) Appeal from the BETTY PECORA ) Circuit Court of ) Cook County Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) <

752 N.E.2d 532 (2001) 323 Ill. App.3d 917 256 Ill.Dec. 652 Theodore PECORA and, Betty Pecora, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF COOK, Illinois, a body politic and Board of Commissioners of Cook County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-99-2284. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. June 19, 2001.

20 F.Supp.2d 422 (1998) Sean HIGGINS; Mark Paton; and Reuben Knoblauch, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN, NEW YORK; James L. Cook, Individually, and in his official capacity as Chief of Police; and Jack Papa, Individually, and in his official capacity as a member of the Johnstown City Council and Chairman of the Johnstown Public Safety Committee, Defendants. No. 96-CV-1732. United States District Court

855 P.2d 231 (1993) Kathy Lynn HIGGINS, individually and as guardian ad litem for Shaundra Higgins, her daughter, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SALT LAKE COUNTY, William Kuentzel, Sheryl Steadman, The University of Utah, The University Medical Center, Caroline Trujillo, and John Does 1 through 10, Defendants and Appellees. No. 900255. Supreme Court of Utah. May 14, 1993.

HALL, Acting Chief Judge. This case involves seven consolidated appeals from four circuit court actions involving one appellee, R. & W. Fruit Company. Each case involves a similar fact situation with two common appellants, Dempsey and Jelsma, who are copartners in the partnership of Skyland Farms. It is alleged that in all of the events described in the complaint Dempsey was acting as a partner in said partnership. The a

15 S.W.3d 124 (2000) COOK COMPOSITES, INC. n/k/a Curran Composites, Inc., Total Composites, Inc., and Cook Composites and Polymers Co., Appellants, v. WESTLAKE STYRENE CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 14-98-01064-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). January 20, 2000. *129 Andrew T. McKinney, IV, Kim A. Cooper, Houston,

Opinion issued April 21, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00483-CV ——————————— THOMAS KEVIN COOK, M.D. AND THE CRANIOFACIAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER- HOUSTON, QIJUN SONG, C.S.A., Appellants

351 S.E.2d 65 (1986) L. Clark HANSBARGER, M.D. v. Hon. Jerry COOK, Judge, Etc. David K. HEYDINGER, M.D., Director, West Virginia Department of Health v. Hon. Jerry COOK, Judge, Etc. Nos. 17098, 17099. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. November 26, 1986. *66 Charles G. Brown, Atty. Gen., J. Bradley Russell, Da