Cases

II. The Parties A. The Debtors 3. Holdings, one of the Debtors on whose behalf the Committee brings this proceeding, is a limited liability company formed under the laws of Delaware. Prior to the Petition Date, certain Comvest entities owned an interest in Holdings. Holdings directly or indirectly owned and operated approximately 18 supermarkets and one pharmacy in Oregon and Washington before contracting

KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *4Recitals A. On December 4, 2018 (the "Solicitation Date"). Maremont Corporation ("Maremont") and its affiliated debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the "Debtors") in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases (the "Chanter

(2008) In re OAKWOOD HOMES CORP., et al., Debtors. OHC Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Credit Suisse First Boston, et al., Defendants. No. 02-13396 (PJW). Civil Action No. 07-799 JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 9, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOSEPH J. FARNAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Motion f

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ELIZABETH T. HEY, United States Magistrate Judge I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant/Counter Claimant (“Mrs. Castellano”) has filed a motion for attorneys’ fees in this ERISA action. The facts and procedural background are long and sordid and discussed at length in the August 24, 2015 decision issued by the Honorable Mary McLaughlin granting summary judgment

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOSEPH J. FARNAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.I.39) filed by Defendants Credit Suisse, Credit Suisse Securities, LLC, Credit Suisse Holdings, and Credit Suisse, Inc. (collectively, “Credit Suisse”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion. BACKGROUND I.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00092-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/20/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00092-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK

BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Derivative Claims of the Amended Complaint (the "Motion") filed by defendant Mark Dunaway ("Dunaway").3 Dunaway argues that the Liquidation Trustee does not have standing to assert the derivative fiduciary duty claims raised in the Amended Complaint. The Liquidation Trustee for the Citadel Creditors' Grantor

KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are the motions by Defendant Joel Weinshanker3 and Defendants Alan Van Ongevalle, Cathy Hershcopf, Frank Marrs and Jeffrey Shrader4 to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Curtis R. Smith, acting as the Liquidating Trustee (the "Trustee") of the Hastings Creditors' Liquidating Trust (the "Trust").

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, District Judge: Pending before the Court are three motions: (1) a motion to dismiss filed by individual defendants Donald J. Keehan *383and Arlene Keehan (the “Individual Defendants” or “Keehans”) (D.I. 68); (2) the Individual Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (D.I. 153); and (3) the motion for summary jud

358 B.R. 637 (2007) In re INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES, INC., et al., Debtors. FSQ, Inc., f/k/a Five Star Quality Care, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Integrated Health Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 00-00389. Adversary No. 02-05193. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 9, 2007. *638 Jeremy W.

471 B.R. 354 (2012) In re AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al., Debtors. George L. Miller, Trustee Plaintiff, v. Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-10203 (MFW). Adversary No. 06-50826 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Defendant National Financial, LLC (“National”) is a consumer finance company that operates under the trade name Loan Till Payday. In May 2013, National loaned $200 to plaintiff Gloria James (the “Disputed Loan”). National described the loan product as a “Flex Pay Loan.” In substance, it was a one-year, non-amortizing, unsecu

OPINION 1 CHRISTOPHER S. SONTCHI, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION This adversary proceeding arises in the third Chapter 11 bankruptcy of a chain of stores providing automotive parts and services doing business as “Strauss Discount Auto.” In 2007, through the plan of reorganization in the second Chapter 11 case,

OPINION1 Sontchi, J. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are two motions to dismiss preferential actions brought by the Chapter 11 Trustee of the above-captioned estates. The two movants are casinos that were formerly in a contractual relationship with the Debtors.2 The two moving casinos are both associated with and are run by their

Related to Docket Nos. 695 and FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER CONFIRMING DEBTORS’ FIRST AMENDED JOINT PLAN OF REORGANIZATION PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE THE HONORABLE GREGORY L. TADDONIO, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE i The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), having: a. commence

303 B.R. 577 (2003) In re INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES, INC., et al., Debtors. FSQ, INC., f/k/a Five Star Quality Care, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Integrated Health Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 00-00389, Adversary No. 02-05193. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 30, 2003. *578

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ) CONSOLIDATED STUDENT LOAN TRUSTS ) C.A. No. 12111-VCS LITIGATION ) OPINION Date Submitted: June 5, 2020 Date Decided: August 27, 2020 Garrett B. Moritz, Esquire, Benjamin Z. Grossberg, Esquire and S. Reiko Rogozen, Esquire of Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilming

3. Coupon Payments to Springfield and Picknelly During the two years prior to the Petition Date, Springfield received monthly cash dividends of $ 71,875 from WJB Mortgage Capital and WJB SEED (the "Springfield Coupon Payments").3 Compl. ¶ 90. The monthly dividend payments started in May 2014 and ended in February 2016.4 Compl. §§ 90, 91, Ex. D. The Springfield Coupon

ACCEPTED 15-25-00108-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/20/2025 4:46 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE NO. ____________ CLERK FILED IN

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: In the context of water regulation, federal law provides that “the discharge of any pollutant by any person shall be unlawful.” 33 U.S.C. § 1311(a). And, as relevant here, it defines a “discharge of a pollutant” to mean “any addition of any pollutant to navigable waters from any point source.” Id. § 1362(12). The Environmental Protection