⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY”

Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2007-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION The Defendant, Heatbath Corporation (Heatbath) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 56. The Plaintiffs, Joseph LaPointe (Mr. LaPointe), and his wife, Yvette LaPointe (collectively, the Plaintiffs), object to the motion. I Facts and Travel The Plainti
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994-05-09 · Published · cited 77× · 17 F.3d 1453
17 F.3d 1453 38 ERC 1259, 305 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 62USLW 2549,24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,544 3M COMPANY (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING), Petitioner,v.Carol M. BROWNER, Administrator of Environmental ProtectionAgency and Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. No. 92-1126. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994-03-04 · Published · cited 17× · 17 F.3d 1453; 305 U.S. App. D.C. 100; 1994 WL 62318
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge: This petition for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s assessment of civil penalties turns on the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2462, the direct descendant of a statute of limitations enacted more than a century and a half ago. There, are three questions. Does § 2462 apply to administrative proceedings? If so, is a proc
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995-02-14 · Published · cited 29× · 47 F.3d 887; 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 723; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2735
47 F.3d 887 25 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 723 HYDRITE CHEMICAL COMPANY, Affiliated Chemical Group, andNational Union Fire Insurance Company ofPittsburgh, Pennsylvania,Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,v.CALUMET LUBRICANTS COMPANY and United States Fidelity andGuaranty Company, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. Nos. 94-2058, 94-2224. United States
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-09-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00067-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/19/2025 11:09 AM No. 15-25-00067-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
Government Employees Insurance Company, et al. v. MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, Series PMPI, et al., Misc. Nos. 3 & 4, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Biran, J. MD. CODE ANN., BUS. OCC. & PROF. (“BO&P”) § 10-604(b)(1) (1989, 2018 Repl. Vol.) – STATUTORY OFFENSE OF BARRATRY – ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT TO SEEK AND RECEIVE UNPAID REIMBURSEMENT OF MEDICARE PAYMENTS – The Supreme Court of Maryland held that Plaintiffs did not violate Maryland’s barratry statute by soliciting Medicare secondary payers to assi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 2× · 117 F.4th 762
Case: 23-60468 Document: 76-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 26, 2024
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-06-12 · Published · cited 27× · 103 F.4th 1241
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0131p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NAJEAN LUCKY, │ Plaintiff-A
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-02-11 · Published · cited 13× · 949 F.3d 891
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2326 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Petitioner – Appellee, v. POWHATAN ENERGY FUND, LLC; HOULIAN “ALAN” CHEN; HEEP FUND, INC.; CU FUND, INC., Respondents – Appellants. ----------------------------- EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE; ELECTRIC
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1603 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. John Nock lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 24-1713 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff -
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2020-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED; and Opinion Filed March 31, 2020 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00495-CV NATIONAL CLAIMS NEGOTIATORS LLC, Appellant V. JUAN GUERRA, AMANDA CARDENAS, CESAR QUINONES, FERNANDO MARIN, KEVIN CLAY, BARRY NIX, SANDRA NIX, JUAN DELTORO, GLEN MOORE, GAIL MOORE, ESMERELDA HERNA
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 30, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00847-CV ——————————— ADAN G. ADAME, ROBERT H. ARISPE, HARVEY EDWARD ARNOLD, HERMON HARVEY ARNOLD, LUCIANO BARRIENTEZ, HOMER L. BATCHELOR, TOMAS BENITEZ, DELBERT RAY BLUNDELL, MELVIN BRION
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-12-30 · Published · cited 40× · 22 F.4th 730
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1010 ___________________________ Hus Hari Buljic, individually and as administrator of the estate of Sedika Buljic; Honario Garcia, individually and as administrator of the estate of Reberiano Leno Garcia; Miguel Angel Hernandez, as co-administrator of the estate of Jose Luis Ayala,
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2024-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Majority Memorandum Opinion filed October 31, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00756-CV STANLEY COLE, Appellant V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.
United States District Court · 2018-03-13 · Published · cited 5× · 320 F. Supp. 3d 1064
ROBERTO A. LANGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Caleb Giddings, a Senior Airman in the United States Air Force Reserves, worked for GunUp Publishing, Inc. (GunUp) in South Dakota. When GunUp merged with Media Lodge, Inc. (Media Lodge) in the spring of 2015, Giddings accepted a job as Media Lodge's director of sales. Shortly thereafter, Giddings left to serve active duty for five-plus months with the Air Force. After returni
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018-03-14 · Published · cited 0× · 241 So. 3d 1252
SAUNDERS, Judge. *1253The defendants-relators, Dixie RV Superstores of Acadiana, LLC (Dixie RV); Dixie Motors, LLC (Dixie Motors); and REV Recreation Group, Inc. (REV), seek supervisory writs from the judgment of the Twelfth Judicial District Court, the Honorable Kerry Spruill presiding, which denied their exception of improper venue. We de
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022-01-31 · Published · cited 14× · 25 F.4th 541
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1121 ___________________________ S&H Farm Supply, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellee v. Bad Boy, Inc. Defendan
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016-03-15 · Published · cited 1× · 169 F. Supp. 3d 585; 2016 WL 1029854; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33365
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: This case presents interesting issues regarding thé timing of the removability of a class action upon the jurisdictional grounds of “minimal diversity” under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, and especially 28 U.S.C. §§ 1446(b)(1) and (b)(3) which create two periods of time for such a removal to federal court. From approximately 2009 to 2014, Plaintiffs
California Court of Appeal · 2024-01-04 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/4/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GARY GARNER, as Personal D082229 Representative, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1720288) v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL f