Cases

185 Kan. 329 (1959) 343 P.2d 213 ELIZABETH L. KREH, Appellant, v. ANDREW WAYNE TRINKLE, Appellee. No. 41,253 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed August 3, 1959. Richard Millsap, of Kansas City argued the cause, and Allen Meyers, Philip C. Gault, Herbert A. Marshall, Doral H. Hawks, Turner M. Murrell and Wm. Carl Zimmerman,

654 N.E.2d 877 (1995) Delores A. GEHLBACH, Charles J. Waiz, Herbert J. Waiz, Eugene R. Waiz, William J. Waiz, Sr., Joseph E. Waiz, and Robert L. Waiz, Appellants-Defendants, v. James G. HAWKINS and Beatrice S. Hawkins, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 10A05-9502-CV-37. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 23, 1995. *878 Ronald R. Fifer,

639 So.2d 637 (1994) Robert SCHAUER and Marlene Schauer, his wife, Appellants, v. Dale B. COLEMAN and Linda Coleman, his wife, Appellees. No. 93-03556. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 1, 1994. *638 Ralph D. Stoddard of Hampton, Stoddard, Griffin & Runnels, Brandon, for appellants. James S. Mo

641 So.2d 58 (1994) Bruce A. JOHNSON, et al., Petitioners, v. PLANTATION GENERAL HOSPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Respondent. Bruce A. Johnson, et al., Petitioners, v. NME HOSPITALS, INC., etc., Respondent. Nos. 82237, 82238. Supreme Court of Florida. June 16, 1994. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1994. *59

467 S.E.2d 848 (1996) 22 Va. App. 61 Emory Adrian GOODSON v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 1176-94-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. March 12, 1996. *851 Margaret Ann Englisby, Chesterfield (Denis C. Englisby; Englisby & Englisby, on brief), for appellant.

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation [J-M] appealed from a district court judgment *238entered upon a jury verdict finding it liable for $140,000 in damages for defective pipe. We affirm. In 1977 Construction Associates, Inc., was the successful bidder to construct a water supply line for the city of Breckenridge, Minnesota. Co

446 N.W.2d 237 (1989) CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC., a North Dakota corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FARGO WATER EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Defendant and Appellee, and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 10154. Supreme Court of North Dakota. August 28, 1989. Vogel, Brantner, Kelly, Knutson, Weir & Bye, Ltd., Fargo, for plaintif

347 So.2d 408 (1977) FLORIDA GREYHOUND OWNERS & BREEDERS ASSOCIATION, INC., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD., etc., et al., Respondents. No. 50128. Supreme Court of Florida. April 21, 1977. Donald G. MacKenzie of MacKenzie & MacKenzie, Bruce W. Greer of Pettigrew, Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson & Greer, for petitioners. He

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a libel in a case in admiralty which arose as a result of a collision between two ships in Tampa Bay. The Jarama is a steamship of Spanish registration, weighs 4937 gross tons, is 4131/2 feet in length and 52 in beam, has a home port of Cadiz, Spain, and is owned

ENGLAND, Justice, concurring. I tentatively voted to accept jurisdiction in this case based on an apparent conflict between the decision below and other Florida appellate decisions. I had thought from the jurisdictional filings that the decision below, which without discussion affirmed an order of the trial court dismissing one count of petitioners’ amended counterclaim, was in conflict with such decisions

BECK, Judge, concurring: This case originated when the press was excluded from a preliminary hearing on a homicide charge. The defendant requested that the press and public be excluded. The presiding District Magistrate consented and closed the proceedings. Appellant newspaper petitioned the lower court for an order opening the proceedings and granting access to transcripts.1 Its

At the outset we are confronted by an anomaly in procedure. The case was argued before us as though a writ of certiorari had been allowed by the Supreme Court, issued and returned, argument regularly had thereon, *Page 203 and judgment entered. The printed book shows a different state of things. There was a rule to show cause why such a writ should not issue, such rule returnable before the court in banc, and argued at the May term, 1934

These appeals are from an order of the Orphans' Court of Philadelphia County disposing of exceptions to the report of an auditor appointed to audit the first and final account of Miriam P. Black, D. Franklin Black, Jr., and Herbert M. Packer, executors named in the will of D. Frank Black, deceased, as stated by D. Franklin Black, Jr. The appellants, Miriam P. Black and D. Franklin Black, Jr., are the widow and son of the decedent and the principal beneficiaries named in the will. D. Frank Bla

The opinion of the court was delivered by Bubch, J.: The action in the district court was one to remove the defendant from the office of mayor of the city of Topeka. Judgment was rendered in his favor, and the state appeals. The petition charged the defendant misconducted himself in office, and neglected to perform duties imposed on him as mayor. Numerous delinquencies were specified. The ap

*582The opinion of the court was delivered by Heher, J. By summary judgment for the plaintiff entered in the Superior Court in this proceeding in lieu of the prerogative writ of mandamus, the defendant assessor of the Township of Middletown was directed to “value and assess” all taxable real property in the township for the year 1957 and subsequent years “

The opinion of the court was delivered by Dawson, J.: The Linn County Bank brought this suit against Elizabeth Grisham and others to foreclose a mortgage on a farm of 522 acres in Linn county. In this suit certain defendants were made parties, and they were permitted to litigate certain of their interests which were more or less affected by the foreclosure suit. The plaintiff bank had a mort

Relator, Martin Donelon, brought this suit against the defendants, Phil G. Deuser, sheriff of St. Louis County, Missouri, and the Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation, surety on the sheriff's bond, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of an assault committed upon plaintiff by Clarence R. Zahner, a deputy sheriff. A trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $15,000. The trial court granted a new trial at defendants' request beca

Original action in quo warranto commenced by the attorney general filing an information on May 10, 1939, by which he seeks to oust the respondent from the office of Prosecuting Attorney of Jackson County. After the respondent filed answer to amended information we appointed a special commissioner to hear the evidence and report his findings of fact and conclusions of law. The commissioner, so appointed, has filed his report finding that the respondent has forfeited his office through