Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “HENSON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE”
Babbitt v. United Parcel Service, Inc.public domain
571 N.E.2d 506 (1991) 212 Ill. App.3d 204 156 Ill.Dec. 722 Myrtle BABBITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. No. 3-90-0518. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. April 25, 1991. John W. Robertson (argued), Ronald Henson, Baras
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Beth Boardman sued her former employer, United Parcel Service General Services Company (“UPSGSC”), alleging that she was terminated because of her gender and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and
Smith v. United Parcel Service, Inc.public domain
53 F.Supp.2d 833 (1999) Keith SMITH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 1:98CV109. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. June 11, 1999. *834 George W. Moore, Asheville, NC, for Keith Smith, plaintiff. John J. Doyle, Jr., Jill S. Stricklin, Constangy, Brooks &
Everbank v. Tommy J. Hensonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 23, 2014 Session EVERBANK ET AL. v. TOMMY J. HENSON ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH110570 Walter L. Evans, Chancellor No. W2013-02489-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 9, 2015 EverBank, the assignee and current owner of a promissory note secured by a previously r
Marley v. United Parcel Service, Inc.public domain
665 F.Supp. 119 (1987) Diane MARLEY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. Civ. A. No. 85-0789 P. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 14, 1987. *120 Mitchell S. Rifkin, Providence, R.I., for plaintiff. Christopher H. Little, Providence, R.I., for defendant. OPINION AND ORDER PETTINE, Senior
Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. * *1841 We granted certiorari in these consolidated cases to decide whether the United States Forest Service has authority under the Mineral Leasing Act,
Sierra Club, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Servicepublic domain
THACKER, Circuit Judge: In this case, we address petitions seeking review of two federal agency decisions. The first is the Bureau of Land Management ("BLM")'s decision granting a right of way through federal land for construction and operation of a pipeline proposed by Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC ("MVP"). The second is the United States Forest Service ("Forest Service")'s decision
Henson v. United Statespublic domain
338 F.Supp. 599 (1971) Coy B. HENSON and Allynn Henson v. UNITED STATES of America. Civ. A. No. 70-B-31. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Brownsville Division. December 20, 1971. Storter, Carinhas & Cunningham, George Storter, Brownsville, Tex., for plaintiffs. Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., and George R. Pain, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Te
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS GENE TIPTON, § No. 08-12-00138-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §
Alphin v. Hensonpublic domain
392 F.Supp. 813 (1975) T. S. ALPHIN and Alphin Aircraft, Inc. v. Richard HENSON and Henson Aviation, Inc. and City of Hagerstown, Maryland. Civ. No. 73-449-T. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 14, 1975. *814 *815 Robert M. Beckman, Frank K. Smith, Washington, D. C., and Norman I
Murphree v. Hensonpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 342 The decree here appealed from was rendered in a proceeding begun in October 1962. Gus Henson filed a bill in equity seeking specific performance of an oral contract to convey certain described land located in Etowah County, Alabama. The bill averred that the contract was made between complainant and Jesse W.
McKenzie County, ND v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1177 ___________________________ McKenzie County, ND Plaintiff - Appellee v. United States of America; Department of Interior
United States v. Tre Tatepublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0121p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap
Defense Integrated Solutions, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 23-64C (Filed: April 5, 2023) ) DEFENSE INTEGRATED ) SOLUTIONS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
The Tolliver Group, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 20-1108C and 20-1290C (Filed: November 30, 2020) ) THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC., ) Solicitation cancellation; Small ) Business Act; Rule of Two; set-aside; and ) withdrawal; Federal Suppl
The Tolliver Group, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 20-1108C and 20-1290C (Filed: November 30, 2020) ) THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC., ) Solicitation cancellation; Small ) Business Act; Rule of Two; set-aside; and
MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp.public domain
161 Ariz. 557 (1989) 779 P.2d 1296 William MACIBORSKI, Jr., the Personal Representative of the Estate of William Maciborski, Sr., deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHASE SERVICE CORPORATION OF ARIZONA, an Arizona corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 88-112. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. March 30, 1989. Re
United States v. Tavarespublic domain
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. After a jury trial, Darryl Tavares and Eddie Jones were both convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 371 of conspiracy to knowingly transport an individual in interstate commerce with the intent that such individual engage in prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (Count One). Mr. Tavares was also convicted of knowingly transporting a minor, B.B., across state l
Jackson-Cobb v. Sprint United Managementpublic domain
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 50) MICHAEL J. WATANABE, United States Magistrate Judge This ease is before this Court for all purposes pursuant to. the Court’s Pilot Program and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) upon consent of the parties and the Order of Reference Upon Consent .to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge issued by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on September 15
United States v. Dimorapublic domain
OPINION & ORDER SARA LIOI, District Judge. The Indictment charges the defendants, James C. Dimora and Michael D. Gabor, *540with RICO conspiracy, conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud, Hobbs Act violations, and various other related crimes. (Doc. No. 444, Third Superseding Indictment.)1 The