Cases

ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on defendant Crane Co.’s (“Crane”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court denies Crane’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff James Wilson Chesher (“Chesher”), a former machinist mate and a commissioned officer in the U.S. Navy, together with his wife, plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BURCIAGA, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center [Sloan-Kettering] and Dr. Basil Hilaris [Hilaris] to dismiss and quash service of process for lack of personal jurisdiction and the motion of Defendant 3M Company to dismiss Plaintiff Dan Swallows’ Complaint in Joinder. Defendants Sloan-Kettering and

FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD

GIBSON, Chief Judge. The Government appeals 1 from a judgment of the District Court 2 dismissing a three-count indictment charging Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (3M) and two of its principal officers, Bert S. Cross and Irwin R. Hansen, with violating v

ORDER DANIEL P. JORDAN III, District Judge. This products-liability case is before the Court on the following motions filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company: Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Mark Sutherland [85]; Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Stan Smith [86]; Motion for Summary Judgment [89]; and Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Punitive Damages Claim [91]. As set forth below, the Motion to Exc

KING, Circuit Judge: Cooper Industries, Ltd., invested its pension-plan assets 'in what turned out to be a Ponzi scheme. It submitted a claim under a commercial-crime insurance policy underwritten by National Union Fire Insurance Company. National Union denied the claim, and Cooper sued. Both parties eventually moved for summary judgment. The district cou

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. At trial in this medical-negligence case, the plaintiffs only expert abandoned his pretrial opinion and — over the objection of the defendant — testified to a new opinion that was never disclosed in discovery. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial. But because the trial court should

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1603 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. John Nock lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 24-1713 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff -

809 F.Supp.2d 972 (2011) Jon HANSON, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. LOPAREX, INC., and Loparex, LLC, Defendants, Counter-Plaintiffs, and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Mondi Packaging Akrosil, LLC, and Mondi Packaging Minneapolis, Inc., Third-Party Defendants. Civil No. 09-1070 (SRN/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 15, 2011.

Case: 15-51002 Document: 00513698537 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-51002 FILED September 29, 2016

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER David A. Faber, Senior United States District Judge Pending before the court is the Petition for Injunctive Relief filed by Lisa Y. Henderson (“Henderson”), the Acting Regional Director of Region 10, Subregion 11, of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). (l:16-ev-06305, Doc. No. 1). Also pending before the court is a second Petition for Injunctive Relief filed by Lisa Y. H

CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Deborah J. Palmer, surviving spouse of Gary J. Palmer, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing Palmer’s negligence claim against A.W. Kuettel & Sons, Inc. We affirm, concluding Palmer has failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment. I [¶2] Gary Palmer was born in 1955 and grew up in Duluth, Minnesota. He was diagnosed wi

RULING DENYING RELIEF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Janet Bond Arterton, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) brought this civil- enforcement action against Defendant .'Iftikar Ahmed (“Mr. Ahmed”) alleging fraud in the purchase or sale of securities in violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 (Co

Filed 1/14/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 17 Deborah J. Palmer, surviving spouse of Gary J. Palmer, deceased, Plaintiff and Appellant v. <

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-CT-01527-SCT KEN E. CLEVELAND, GEORGE T. SMITH- VANIZ, M.D., AND JACKSON HMA, INC., d/b/a CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER v. LANELL HAMIL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF EMMETT O. HAMIL, DECEASED, WHO ARE ENTITLED TO RECOVER UNDER THE WRONGFUL DEATH AND SURVIVAL STATUTE ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2010 TRIAL JUDGE

Case: 24-10995 Document: 89-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

943 F.Supp. 1117 (1996) MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. RAUH RUBBER, INC., GAIA Enterprises, Inc., Joseph Rauh, James T. Rauh and James Thomas, Defendants. Civil No. 4-96-202. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. October 17, 1996. *1118 *1119 <

48 F.Supp.2d 653 (1999) Larry FAULK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS Corp., et al., Defendant. No. 1:99CV180 (TH). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. May 26, 1999. *654 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker, Parks & Rosenthal, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. Walter Clay Cooke, Ken

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSEPH SELLERS, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-2428 (TJK) ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case is a cautionary tale about contract negotiations and a monument to Murphy’s Law. Plaintiffs Joseph

132 S.W.3d 260 (2004) William BOWERS, Claimant-Appellant,. v. HILAND DAIRY COMPANY, Employer-Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party-Respondent. No. 25807. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. March 2, 2004. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Overruled March 18, 2004.</