Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “HAWKINS v. JONES”
Hawkins v. Jonespublic domain
CLAYTON, JUDGE: Kathryn Michelle Hawkins appeals the grant of a domestic violence order by the Hardin Family Court. After careful review, we vacate and remand for an evidentiary hearing on whether a DVO should be granted. BACKGROUND Joshua Jones sought an emergency protective order ("EPO") against Kathyrn Hawkins, which was granted on October 18, 2017. The EPO was granted on his behalf, the parties'
Jones v. Hawkinspublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Jones v. Hawkinspublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Geno L. Hawkins, Sr. v. Julie L. Jones, etc.public domain
PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on the petition of Geno L. Hawkins, Sr., for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 His petition is the thirteenth extraordinary writ petition he has filed with this Court since 2012. We dismissed Hawkins’ petition in this case and expressly retained jurisdiction to pursue any possible sa
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-01652-COA MARY HAWKINS APPELLANT v. TOMMIE JONES AND BAPTIST MEDICAL APPELLEES CENTER-LEAKE INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/06/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHRISTOPHER A. COLLINS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LEAKE COUNTY CIRCUIT
Jones v. Hawkinspublic domain
*960In re Shreveport, City of; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 398,567; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 29914-CA. Granted. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Jones v. Hawkinspublic domain
731 So.2d 216 (1999) Sandra JONES, et al. v. Floyd HAWKINS, Jr., et al. Nos. 98-C-1259, 98-C-1288. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 19, 1999. Ramona N. Wallis, Jerald N. Jones, Shreveport, for Applicant in No. 98-1259. Richard M. Jones, Shreveport, for Applicant in No. 98-C-1288. Richard P. Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., Angie R. LaPlace, Baton Rouge, Richard M.
Jones v. Hawkinspublic domain
In re Jones, Sandra; Willis, Randolph;— Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 398,567; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 29914-CA. Granted as to the issue of reduction of medical expenses. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Jones v. Hawkinspublic domain
708 So.2d 749 (1998) Sandra JONES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Floyd HAWKINS, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 29914-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. January 21, 1998. Order Amending Decision on Rehearing April 9, 1998. *752 Richard Michael John, Shreveport, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Jones, Dba Melder Publishing Co. v. Hawkinspublic domain
541 U.S. 1083 JONES, DBA MELDER PUBLISHING CO.v.HAWKINS ET AL. No. 03-1100. Supreme Court of United States. June 1, 2004. 1 ante, p. 973. Petitions for rehearing denied.
United States v. Hawkinspublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jarriette Eurk Hawkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hawkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec
Jones, Dba Melder Publishing Co. v. Hawkinspublic domain
541 U.S. 973 JONES, DBA MELDER PUBLISHING CO.v.HAWKINS ET AL. No. 03-1100. Supreme Court of United States. April 5, 2004. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 74 Fed. Appx. 391.
Hawkins v. Willow Inc.public domain
MARC E, JOHNSON, Judge. | fiPlaintiffs/Appellants, Keela Hawkins, et al., appeal the sustaining of a declinato-ry exception of lack of jurisdiction, the granting of a motion .to strike and the denial of a motion for new trial-in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Willow Incorporated (hereinafter referred to .as “Willow, Inc.”) and National Home Insurance Company (A Risk Retention Group) (hereinafter referred to as “NHIC
State v. Faron Raymond Hawkinspublic domain
ON THE BRIEFS HORTON, Justice. Faron Hawkins appeals from his 2008 conviction for two counts of robbery. Hawkins argues that the district court’s 2010 retroactive determination that he was competent to stand trial in 2008 violated his due process rights. He also argues that he was not competent to waive his right to counsel and represent himself pro se.
Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PETER C. ECONOMUS, District Judge. Plaintiff Christopher Hawkins filed this action claiming that he was injured by a medical device made by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. In his Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that the device, a Medtronic Implantable Pulse Generator, Model # 7425 (hereinafter “IPG”), was defective and had to be replaced due to Defendant’s failure to satisfy its o
RENDERED: MAY 16, 2025; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2023-CA-0688-MR JAMES ADAM HAWKINS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE KATHRYN H. GABHART, JUDGE ACTION NO. 20-CI-00100 BO
Hawkins v. Hawkinspublic domain
999 S.W.2d 171 (1999) Darrell HAWKINS, Appellant, v. Linda Lou HAWKINS, Appellee. No. 03-98-00321-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. August 26, 1999. *173 Myrtle Jones McDaniel, Temple, for Appellant. Before Justices JONES, B.A. SMITH and YEAKEL. J. WOODFIN JONES, Justice. Pursuant to the Soldiers' and Sa
Hawkins v. Wilkes Reg'l Med. Ctr.public domain
STROUD, Judge. Plaintiff appeals from an opinion and award denying her additional compensation because she failed to file a claim against her employer's insurance company. Because plaintiff timely filed her claim for her back injury against her employer, the Industrial Commission erred in denying her claim due to her failure to file a claim against a specific insurance company. Plaintif
State v. Faron Raymond Hawkinspublic domain
BURDICK, Chief Justice. This is a permissive interlocutory appeal from the district court’s determination that the law of the case doctrine prohibited it from making a retroactive determination of Faron Hawkins’s mental competency when he stood trial in January 2008. I. Factual and Procedural Background In January 2008, a jury co
HAWKINS Et Al. v. BLAIR Et Al.public domain
Branch, Judge. Charles Jordan Hawkins and Jacob Nathaniel Hawkins, residents of South Carolina, filed suit in Fulton County against James A. Blair III, a resident of South Carolina and an attorney with Nexsen Pruet, LLC, which is located in South Carolina, alleging that Blair illegally transferred money from their personal bank accounts at Morgan Stanley in Atlanta to Nexsen Pru