Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “HARRY LEE SMITH”
State of West Virginia v. Harry Lee Smith, Jr.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2020 Term _______________ FILED No. 19-0143 June 16, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. _______________ EDYTHE NASH GA
R. Lee Smith v. City of Jacksonvillepublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-534 ____________ R. LEE SMITH, et al., Petitioners, vs. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Respondent. [May 25, 2017] QUINCE, J. This cas
Lee Memorial Health System v. Smithpublic domain
WALLACE, Judge. Jeffrey Smith and Melissa Smith filed an action against Lee Memorial Health System, d/b/a HealthPark Medical Center, for alleged medical malpractice in the care and treatment of their minor child. Lee Memorial sought a protective order to prohibit the Smiths’ counsel from having communications outside the presence of Lee Memorial’s counsel with the child’s treating physicians who are employed by Lee Memorial.
ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In 2004, Sea Breeze I, LLC (Sea Breeze) contracted with Harry Baker Smith Architects II, PLLC (HBSA) to provide design services for the construction of a condominium complex. Sea Breeze also contracted with Roy Anderson Corporation (Roy Anderson) to provide construction services for the same project. Both contracts contained arbitration agreements. After some dispute over an all
United States v. Harry Katzinpublic domain
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. To briefly recap: In December 2010, law enforcement officers, after consulting an Assistant United States Attorney, and in accord with the general policy of the United States Department of Justice, magnetically attached an independently battery *217
United States v. Harry Katzinpublic domain
SMITH, J., Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by McKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, FUENTES, and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges. I join Judge Greenaway’s eloquent dissent in its entirety. There is little that can be added to Judge Greenaway’s devastating critique. I write here only to expand on a worrisome facet of the majority’s reasoning. Because Knotts1 and Karo
Smith v. Leepublic domain
In re Wainwright, Thomas Jr.; Trans-america Insurance Group; — Defendants; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 475,489; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 00-CA-1079. Denied. VICTORY, J., would grant the writ. TRAYLOR, J., would grant the writ.
People v. Smithpublic domain
SLOUGH J. *719Defendant Michael Lee Smith appeals from the summary denial of his Proposition 47 resentencing petition. (Pen.Code, § 1170.18.) Using Riverside County Superior Court's standard petitioning form, Smith sought to have two felony second degree commercial burglary (§ 459)1 convictions (counts 1, 2) designated as mis
Smith v. Murphypublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: These consolidated appeals are cross-appeals from the partial grant of summary judgment in favor of Torrey Murphy, Charles Grant, William Murphy, and Alex Underwood * (collectively, “Defendants”). In his complaint, Steve Randall Smith allege
People v. Smithpublic domain
Opinion SLOUGH, J.— Defendant Michael Lee Smith appeals from the summary denial of his Proposition 47 resentencing petition. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18.) Using Riverside County Superior Court’s standard petitioning form, Smith sought to have two felony second degree commercial burglary (§ 459)
Givens v. Smithpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis A. Givens appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing Givens’ complaint in part and granting summary judgment in part. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
Smith v. Statepublic domain
Benham, Justice. Appellant Robert Merrill Smith was convicted of the malice murder of his wife, Jennifer Smith, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.1 On appeal Smith questions the sufficiency of the evidence, the content of the jury instructions, the trial court’s refusal to admit evidence of the victim’s purported acts of violence against third parties, and trial counsel’
Mandal v. Leepublic domain
PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Williams v. Oken, 62 So.3d 1129 (Fla.2011). BENTON, C.J., WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
WFC Lynnwood I LLC v. Lee of Raleigh, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-562 Filed: 5 June 2018 Wake County, No. 15 CVS 17040 WFC LYNNWOOD I LLC and WFC LYNNWOOD II LLC, Delaware Limited Liability Companies, Plaintiffs v. LEE OF RALEIGH, INC., CHARLES L. PARK and SUN OK HELLNER, Defendants Appeal by defendants from orders entered 27 January 2017 and 24 March 2017 by Judge R. Allen Baddour, Jr. in Wake Coun
Cheeks v. Smithpublic domain
MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. After the Board of Aldermen for the City of Canton, Mississippi, voted to remove four members of the Canton Utilities Commission, the ousted commissioners1 took two legal actions in the Madison County Circuit Court. They filed a bill of exceptions, which is the statutory procedure to appeal a municipal board’s decision 2
State of Tennessee v. Triston Lee Harrispublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 17, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TRISTON LEE HARRIS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lawrence County No. 25348 Jim T. Hamilton, Judge No. M2006-01532-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 6, 2008 The defendant, Triston Lee Harris, appeals a certified question of law fol
Smith, Carl Leepublic domain
715-/5" ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 14-13-00595-CR OFFENSE: Capital Murder STYLE: Carl Lee Smith v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 351st District Court DATE: June 16, 2015 Publish: No TC CASE #: 1247979 IN THE COURT OF CR
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc.public domain
OPINION BROWN, Judge: ¶ 1 Timothy Lee suffered serious injuries while performing cleanup duties during the final stages of construction at a Sam’s Club store located on property owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”). Lee was employed at the time by Able Body Labor (“Able Body”) 1 , which s
Henry Lee Dixon v. Lawton Chiles, Daniel Nugent, Harry K. Singletary, Jr., G. Hall, David L. Smithpublic domain
112 F.3d 1174 Henry Lee Dixonv.Lawton Chiles, Daniel Nugent, Harry K. Singletary, Jr., G.Hall, David L. Smith NO. 96-2486 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 07, 1997 M.D.Fla., 106 F.3d 418 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.
Archie Lee Smith v. the State of Floridapublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 24, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-0654 Lower Tribunal No. F23-653 ________________ Archie Lee Smith, Appellant,