Cases

ORDER OF COURT The various groups of plaintiffs have collectively filed three petitions for panel rehearing and two for rehearing en banc, raising various objections to the panel opinion. This order deals primarily with the petitions for panel rehearing. None of them has merit. End-Payor Class’s Petition The End-Payor Class, seeking only panel rehearing, argues that we must remand the case with

500 F.Supp.2d 736 (2007) Carolyn REECE, Plaintiff, v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, LP; Astrazeneca LP., Defendants. No. C-1-05-322. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 25, 2007. *737 *738 Frank Woodson, Melissa A. Prickett, Matthew E. Munson, Beasley, Allen, Crow, <

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/31/2025 12:13 PM No. 15-25-00088-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/31/2025 5:27 PM No. 15-25-00088-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/30/2025 3:21 PM No. 15-25-

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/10/2025 12:50 PM No. 15

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/31/2025 12:08 PM No. 15-25-00088-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/9/2025 3:24 PM No. ___________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/24/2025 2:15 PM No. 15-25-

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/4/2025 10:37 AM NO. 15-25-00088-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/20/2025 6:36 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/18/2025 3:30 PM No. 15-25-00088-CV CHRISTOPHE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS November 21, 2025 AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/18/2025 3:30 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 5:16 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Granted and Opinion filed November 21, 2025. In The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-25-00088-CV IN RE ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial

LEONARD P. STARK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION This highly contentious case is not yet four months old. In its short life, the Court has held four hearings (two telephonically and two in-person) (see D.I. 24, 109, 173, 181, 182), resolved at least nine motions (see, e.g. , D.I. 1, 8, 37, 47, 61, 86, 105, 114, 115), reviewed hundreds of pages of briefing (

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BURTON WEINSTEIN, CAROLE ) NIMEROFF, CEDARVIEW ) OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, ) C.A. No. N18C-04-043 MAA LP, JEFFREY SCHNAPER, NIGEL ) GREGG, and WILLIAM SHEPPARD ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE *1045This matter was before the Court for a bench trial beginning on February 1, 2018 and concluding on February 2, 2018, on the issue of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,772,209 (the "'20

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEITH A. WILANT, Plaintiff, V. C.A. No.: N17C-10-365 CEB BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, f/k/a BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY Nee Nee Nee” Nee” ee ee eee” ee’ ee’ ee” ee” Defendant. Submitted: January 29, 2020 Decided: May 13, 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION On Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and Motion for Summary Judgment GRANTED. A. Dale Bowers, II, Esquire, LAW OFFICE OF A. DALE BOWERS, Wilmington, Delaware. Shawn A. Ricci