Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “HANKERSON v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY”
133 B.R. 711 (1991) In re Gail J. HANKERSON, Debtor. Gail J. HANKERSON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and United States Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. In re Cheryl PETTIS, Debtor. Cheryl PETTIS, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, United States Department of Education, Mitchell W. Miller, Trustee, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 91-12263S, 91-13760S, Adv
Hankerson v. Thomaspublic domain
148 A.2d 583 (1959) Rubye A. HANKERSON, Appellant, v. Dr. Riley F. THOMAS, Appellee. No. 2264. Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Argued November 18, 1958. Decided February 24, 1959. Rehearing Denied March 16, 1959. *584 Garfield C. Thompson, Washington, D. C., for appellant
Saunders v. George Washington Universitypublic domain
768 F.Supp. 843 (1991) Deloris M. SAUNDERS, Plaintiff, v. The GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 89-2631-LFO. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 20, 1991. Abe W. Weissbrodt, John P. Racin, Weissbrodt, Racin & Mielke, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Thomas D. Quinn, Jr., Jack M.H. Frazier, Michael A. Dymersky, Washi
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2025-Ohio-3137.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 23CA11 v. : RICHARD JOHNSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID KEOWN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 23-cv-3570 (CRC) INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs David Keown and Diana Angus are former members of
Xereas v. Heisspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN N. XEREAS, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. Civil Action No. 12-456 DAR MARJORIE A. HEISS, et al., Defendants/ Counter-Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM OPINION Two motions fo
State v. Smithpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2022-Ohio-371.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 20CA3934 v. : HENRY DEANDRE SMITH, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendant-Appellant.
Doe v. Catholic Diocese of Clevelandpublic domain
JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION {¶ 1} In this consolidated appeal, plaintiff-appellant Jane B. Doe ("Doe") appeals the trial court's transfer and reassignment of her case to two different judges, claiming that the orders transferring the case failed to state the *Page 52 reason for the transfers. She also appeals the trial court's subsequent decision to dismiss the case based on the statute of limit
State v. Fryepublic domain
PRESTON, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Marlon D. Frye ("Frye"), appeals the July 11, 2017 judgment entry of sentence of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. {¶ 2} On December 15, 2016, the Allen County Grand Jury indicted Frye on three counts, including: Count One of having weapons while under disability in violation of R.C
United States v. Baileypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the ancillary petitions filed by former clients of the Defendant James W. “Bill” Bailey, Jr., a financial advisor who has admitted to engaging in a massive Ponzi scheme to defraud investors of millions of dollars over the course of a decade. The Petitioners whose matters are addressed by this Ord
Doe 1 v. American Federation of Government Employeespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN DOE #1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-1558 (JDB) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jeffrey David Cox resigned as National President of the American Federation of Government Employees (“AFGE”)
United States v. Askia Washingtonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Asida Washington was ensnared by a “stash house reverse sting” operation — one which hit many of the by-now-familiar beats.1 Acting on what appeared to be insider information from a drug courier, Washington and his three co-conspirators planned to rob a Philadelphia property where they thought 10 kilograms of cqc
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Thompson, 2026-Ohio-398.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2024-P-0074 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas MICHAEL THOMPSON,
State v. Adamspublic domain
HARRELL, J. I. Facts & Process On the night of 17 February 1979, Kathy P.1 and her sister, Teresa B., were walking to their car in the parking lot of the Prince George’s Motor Lodge, after leaving the Cuckoo’s Nest, a nearby bar. The Motor Lodge and the bar are in Prince George’s County. A van approached and c
State v. Gentrypublic domain
Andersen, C.J. — Facts of Case Defendant Jonathan Lee Gentry appeals his conviction and death sentence for the murder of a 12-year-old girl in Kitsap County. The following is a summary of the facts that were developed during the 6-week trial and approximately 8 weeks of *579hearings on related motions. The facts pertinent to eac
People v. Mayfieldpublic domain
14 Cal.4th 668 (1997) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DENNIS MAYFIELD, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S005620. Supreme Court of California. January 2, 1997. *701 COUNSEL Jay L. Lichtman and Roberta K. Thyfault, under appointments by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lungren, Att
United States v. Joseph C. Fradypublic domain
636 F.2d 506 204 U.S.App.D.C. 234 UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Joseph C. FRADY, Appellant. No. 79-2356. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued June 13, 1980.Decided Aug. 4, 1980.Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 22, 1980. Appeal from the
Jett v. Dallas Independent School Districtpublic domain
491 U.S. 701 (1989) JETT v. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 87-2084. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 28, 1989 Decided June 22, 1989[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT *704 Frank Gilstrap argued the cause for petitioner in No. 87-2084 and