Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) DOYLE R. HAM, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1527 (ESH) ) MET

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVE PAPPAS, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 19-2800 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 19 :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOYLE RAY HAM, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1720 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This is the second Title VII action brought by Plaintiff Doyle Ray Ham, Jr., proceeding pro se, challenging his non-selection

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOYLE RAY HAM, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1720 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Doyle Ray Ham, Jr., proceeding pro se, challenges his 2015 non-selection for a position as a police officer wi

PIERSOL, District Judge. In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, six St. Louis, Missouri, police officers appeal the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Police Board of the Metropolitan Police Department of the City of St. Louis and the individual members of the Board—Freeman Bosley, Jr., A

Cavanagh, J. (dissenting). Today the majority rejects plaintiff’s sex-based hostile-work-environment claim because it is not sexual in nature. According to the majority, “conduct or communication that is gender-based, but is not sexual in nature, does not constitute sexual harassment as that term is clearly defined in [MCL 37.2103(i) of] the [Civil Rights Act].” An

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DEBORAH A. BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Gordon Urquhart (“Plaintiff’ or “Urquhart”), an African-American male, together with eight African-American plaintiffs and one Hispanic plaintiff, all of whom are current or former employees of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) Police Department (“MTA PD”), commenced this action against MTA and four MTA executive officer

2013 WI 78 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2007AP221 & 2007AP1440 COMPLETE TITLE: Bostco LLC and Parisian, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross- Respondents-Petitioners, v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted and Memorandum Opinion filed November 5, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00940-CV IN RE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 11th District Court

ROGERS, J., delivered the opinion of the court. BOGGS, C.J. (pp. 624-26), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. CLAY, J. (pp. 626-33), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. The question in this case is whether it is arbitrary and capricious for an ERISA plan administrator to deny Personal Accident Insurance benefits to the beneficiar

35 So.3d 266 (2010) Jack Patrick HARRIS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, New England Life Insurance Company, Diane Freeman, Katherine Sakaloglou and Charles L. McGinty. No. 2009 CA 0034. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. February 5, 2010. *267 Jack Patrick Harris, Baton Rouge, LA, In Proper Person Plaintiff-Appe

178 Mich. App. 601 (1989) 444 N.W.2d 529 PEOPLE v. HAM-YING Docket No. 104083. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided January 24, 1989. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, Paul Maloney, Prosecuting Attorney, and Nancy A. Bogren, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people. <

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

USCA11 Case: 20-14210 Date Filed: 07/14/2021 Page: 1 of 97 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-14210 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cv-03702-JPB RICHARD LEE BROWN, JEFFREY RONDEAU, DAVID K

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

LIVELY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which RYAN, J., joined. KENNEDY, J. (pp. 1119-20), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. LIVELY, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee (Metro), appeals from a judgment of the district court entered on June 14, 1994, finding it in contempt of a 1982 consent dec

PRESIDING JUSTICE APPLETON delivered the opinion of the court: Pursuant to section 9(a — 5) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (Act) (5 ILCS 315/9(a — 5) (West 2006)), the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (union), filed a petition to represent telecommunications superv