Cases

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–100 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 23, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge SHEDD concurred. Judge GREGORY wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from a death sentence imposed under the Federal Death Penalty *610Act (the “FDPA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3591-98, following a conviction for m

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge: Mario Herbert Gonzalez Caro (hereinafter Gonzalez) appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York, convicting him after a jury trial of bringing into the United States $10,010 in counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes with intent to defraud and possessing the same notes with intent to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 47

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Appellant George Putney (“Putney”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered following a bench trial: The trial court found Putney guilty on two counts: .leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident (Count I) and first-degree involuntary manslaughter (Count II). Putney argues that the trial court

*214Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion for the court, in which Judge WYNN and Judge FLOYD joined except as to Part V.B. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion for the court as to Part V.B., in which Judge FLOYD joined. Judge MOTZ wrote a separate dissenting opinion as to Part V.B. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, writing for

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334

819 F.2d 1139Unpublished DispositionNOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Rebecca G. SPRINGER, as Executrix of the Estate of Jon RickySpringer, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant,

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

256 S.C. 336 (1971) 182 S.E.2d 671 Dora Gary EASTERLY et al., Respondents, v. Fred N. Hall, Appellant. 19210 Supreme Court of South Carolina. April 26, 1971. *337 Messrs. Perrin, Perrin & Mann, of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Messrs. Means, Evins, Browne & Hamilton, of Sp

DOOLEY, J. ¶ 1. Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence (DUI), arguing that: (1) the State's principal witness testified on a matter that violated the trial court's pretrial ruling granting defendant's motion in limine; (2) the court erred in overruling defendant's objection to the prosecutor eliciting testimony from the State's principal witness that defendant never reported to police that he was not drivin

USCA11 Case: 23-10385 Document: 112-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10385 ____________________ JANUARY LITTLEJOHN, JEFFREY LITTL

Chief Justice DURRANT, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION {1 Floyd Eugene Maestas was charged with aggravated murder, a violation of see*905tion 76-5-202 of the Utah Code, and aggravated burglary, a violation of section 76-6-208 of the Utah Code.1 After being tried and convicted on both charges, he was s

253 P.3d 727 (2011) STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jonathan W. ELLINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 33843. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 2011 Term. May 27, 2011. *730 Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Erik R. Lehtinen argued. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General, B

Mr. Justice Burnett delivered the opinion of the court. 1. The testimony on the accounting was taken November 27,1914, and seems to have covered the contro*316versy to December 1st of that year. In this court the plaintiffs challenge the amount demanded by the defendant for his personal services in the management of the property

Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <

OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: Plaintiffs are a group of 24 individuals who were arrested by the New York City Police Department (the “NYPD”) in connection with a series of protests held during the 2004 Republican National Convention (the “RNC”), Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Defendants the City of New York (the “City”) and numerous New York City officials and polic

452 F.Supp.2d 133 (2006) Donald MAC PHERSON, Plaintiffs, v. STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee Defendant. No. 05 Civ. 2960(DRH)(JO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 20, 2006. *134 Irwin Popkin, Esq. Parkway Shirley, NY, for Plaintiff. Shapiro & DiCaro, LLP by Robert S.. Leni, Esq., R

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

48 F.Supp.2d 670 (1999) Gerardo CASTILLO, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. CASE FARMS OF OHIO, Inc., et al., Defendants. No. DR 97-CA-89. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Del Rio Division. March 23, 1999. *671 *672 *673 Lisa J. D'Souza, Selena N. Solis, Tex