Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gwendolyn Jordan”
State v. Jordanpublic domain
19 So.3d 1191 (2009) STATE of Louisiana v. Don O. JORDAN. No. 09-KA-7. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. June 23, 2009. *1192 Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Assistant District Attorney, Gretna, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Gwendolyn K. Brown, Attorney at Law, Louisiana Appella
Jordan v. Shandspublic domain
500 S.E.2d 215 (1998) 255 Va. 492 Gwendolyn L. JORDAN v. Samuel SHANDS, et al. Record No. 971316. Supreme Court of Virginia. April 17, 1998. *216 Martha L. Bond (James T. Edmunds; McEachin & Gee, on briefs), Richmond, for appellant. William Joe Hoppe, Richmond, for appellees Jerry Oliver and Cec
GWENDOLYN LITTMAN v. ANDREW CACHO.public domain
NEWMAN, Senior Judge: On July 12, 2013, Judge Di Toro issued the “Second Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of Permanent Custody” (the “July 2013 Custody Order”); which provided, inter alia, that appellant Gwendolyn Littman would have “reasonable rights of visitation [with her grandson A.L.], to be arranged by the parties, and to include o
Jordan v. Circuit Court of Lee Countypublic domain
Donald L. Corbin, Justice. Petitioner Richard Jordan, M.D., petitions this court for a writ of prohibition, or alternatively, a writ of certiorari, vacating the order of Lee County Circuit Judge L.T. Simes denying his motion to dismiss the third complaint filed against him by Respondent Gwendolyn White, Administratrix of the Estate of Darthula Vaughn. In his petition, Dr. Jordan argues that the circuit cou
GWENDOLYN LITTMAN v. ANDREW CACHOpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-FM-379 7/21/16 GWENDOLYN LITTMAN, APPELLANT, V.
Jordan v. Earthgrains Companies, Inc.public domain
576 S.E.2d 336 (2003) Mary JORDAN, Alphonso Little, Lee Broadie, Walter Weathers, Jon Curry, Robert Baley, Theodore Rankin, John White, Florence Geer, Sally Grier, Esther Gainer, Jerry Nivens, James Earnhardt, Helen Bailey, Norman Huffman, Frances Stitt, Cola McLeod, Thomas Hunter, Rachel Campbell, Sophie Anthony, Jane Canipe, Richard Rankin, Peggy Campbell, Willie Kay, David Ealey, Wilson Johnson, Edward Biggers, Gwendolyn Sellers, Gerald Rudd, Brian Lo
Jordan v. Sauvepublic domain
247 S.E.2d 739 (1978) Marcella Jean JORDAN v. Neil SAUVE and Koons Ford, Inc. Record No. 770352. Supreme Court of Virginia. October 6, 1978. Gwendolyn Jo M. Carlberg, Alexandria, for plaintiff in error. Richard E. Dixon, Fairfax (Swinburne & Dixon, Fairfax, on brief), for defendants in error. Center for Auto Safety and Automobile Owners Action Coun
Moore v. Jordanpublic domain
George Rose Smith, Justice. This is a child custody case. When the parties were divorced in May, 1968, their daughter, Michelle Moore, was four months old. At that time the child’s mother, now the appellee, was only twenty and had no home to which to take the child. Consequently the decree provided, by agreement, that custody was awarded to the child’s father, now the appellant. Moore was then living
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Milton Russell brought suit against his employer, Delco Remy, alleging race-based employment discrimination. The district court dismissed his complaint in light of his failure to file a charge of discrimination within Title VII’s 180-day filing period. After the entry of judgment, Russell filed a motion requesting that the district court amend its ruling to
Tate v. Kennypublic domain
PETTIGREW, J. LThis lawsuit arises out of a motor-vehicle accident. The parties stipulated that the defendant driver was solely at fault in causing the accident. ■ Thus, the only issues at the trial on the merits were *123the extent of plaintiffs’ injuries caused -by the accident and damages. After a jury trial, the jury awarded plaintiffs $51,704.39 in general and sp
American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida v. Tellispublic domain
STUART, Justice. Gladys Tellis, Sherry Bronson, Gwendolyn Moody, Nadine Ivy,'and Uneeda Tram-mell (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the policyholders”) initiated separate actions against American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida (“American Bankers”), asserting generally that American Bankers had sold them homeowner’s insurance policies providing a level of coverage they could neyer receive, even in the event of a tot
Jones v. Fondufepublic domain
908 A.2d 1161 (2006) Dawn Reed JONES, Appellant, v. Gwendolyne Y. FONDUFE, Eddie Reed, Estate of Bernard Njovens, Appellees. No. 04-CV-799. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 10, 2005. Decided October 5, 2006. *1162 Gregory L. Lattimer, Washington, for appellant. Richard E. Jordan, Wash
United States v. Graciela Zuniga-Arteagapublic domain
MARTIN, Circuit Judge: Graciela Zuniga-Arteaga appeals her conviction for aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l). On appeal, Ms. Zuniga-Arteaga argues that § 1028A(a)(l) cannot be applied to her conduct because that provision does not cover the theft of a person’s identity when that person is no longer living. After careful review of the briefs, and
State v. Jordanpublic domain
719 So.2d 556 (1998) STATE of Louisiana v. Kevin JORDAN. No. 97-KA-1756. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. September 16, 1998. *559 Harry F. Connick, District Attorney of Orleans Parish, Val M. Solino, Assistant District Attorney of Orleans Parish, New Orleans, for State. Sherry Watters, Louisiana Appellate Pro
Watkins v. New Castle Countypublic domain
374 F.Supp.2d 379 (2005) Joyce WATKINS, Dawn Bottjer, and Gwendolyn Resop, Plaintiffs, v. NEW CASTLE COUNTY, Town of Elsmere, and Town of Newport, Defendants. Town of Newport, Cross-Claimant and Cross-Defendant, v. New Castle County and Town of Elsmere, Cross-Defendants and Cross-Claimants. No. CIV.A. 03-791-KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 16, 2
PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether we have jurisdiction over an appeal of a newly elected local school board and whether its individual members violated the clearly established right to free speech of the superintendent of education and her assistant superintendent when the board terminated or demoted them for public comments about local tax policy.
St. Germain v. Isenhowerpublic domain
98 F.Supp.2d 1366 (2000) Daniel Lucien ST. GERMAIN, Plaintiff, v. Daryl ISENHOWER and Vickie Lee Anderson, Defendants. Daniel Lucien St. Germain, Plaintiff, v. Michael Moore, Joanne Holman, Russell Akins, Marc A. Cianca, Peter Warren Kenny, Dr. Ralph Mora, Gwendolyn Miller, and Bernardo Fernandez, Defendants. No. 00-0013-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division.</
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-IA-01378-SCT MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST HEALTH SYSTEMS INC. AND MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. SHEMIKA HARRIS, MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND OF MEKHI JORDAN ARD, A MINOR AND LAKINA WALKER, MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND OF CALEB ARD, A MINOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF ROOSEVELT ARD, III, DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/26/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TOMIE T. GREEN TRIAL COURT
Estate of F.W. v. Statepublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by GILROY, J.A.D. The law firm of Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks & Zarin appeals from the March 30, 2006, order of the Law Division, which denied its motion for an order setting a reasonable attorney fee on that part of a personal injury recovery exceeding $2,000,000, pursuant to Rule 1:21-7(c)(5). The law firm also appeals from the order of May 26, 2006, which de
ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), and Ellie Jordan as plaintiff-intervenor, appeal from the final judgment entered in favor of WilTel, Inc., (“WilTel”) in this Title VII action. The district court found that WilTel refused to hire Jordan for a permanent position as a carrier customer service representative because she is an evangelical Christian. Nevertheless, the district