Cases

OPINION COLE, Chief Judge. One afternoon, plaintiff Louis Dana Gradisher consumed multiple alcoholic drinks, then made several erratic phone calls to 911 complaining about someone with a gun. When officers from the City of Akron Police Department arrived at his residence and Gradisher locked his door and retreated upon seeing them, they feared that someone

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0105p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. USN4U, LLC, │

801 F.2d 824 55 USLW 2188, 16 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,942,12 O.S.H. Cas.(BNA) 2089,1986-1987 O.S.H.D. ( 27,703 OHIO MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION; Akron Selle Company,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF AKRON, State of Ohio; Health Commission, City ofAkron; Health Department, City of Akron; C. William Keck,as Director of Health of the City of Akron; Harold K.Stubbs, as Director of Law of the City

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgment 628 F.Supp. 623 in favor of defendants entered after the court determined that the Akron “Right to Know” Ordinance, regulating hazardous and toxic substances in the workplace, was not preempted by the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 651, et seq., or the Occupational Safety and Health Agency’s (OSHA) Haza

62 F.3d 791 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,843William APPLETON, Trustee for the Liquidation of theBusiness of First Ohio Securities Company,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OHIO and Bank One, Akron, N.A.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-4246. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued March 20, 1995.Decided Aug. 10, 1995.Reheari

JOINER, District Judge. This case arises out of a Ponzi scheme operated by Thomas Gilmartin, the sole shareholder of First Ohio Securities Corporation (FOSC), and FOSC’s president, Terence Zawacki. Gilmartin and Zawacki diverted funds intended by their customers to be invested by FOSC, into a bank account maintained by Gilmartin’s sole proprietorship, First Ohio Investment Corporation (First Ohio Investment). Plaint

MILBURN, Circuit Judge. Intervenor-appellant State of Ohio appeals the judgment of the district court declaring Ohio Amended Substitute House Bill 319 (H.B. 319) unconstitutional. H.B. 319, which enacted Ohio Rev.Code §§ 2151.85 and 2505.073 and amended Ohio Rev.Code § 2919.12, requires parental notification by physicians who'intend to perform abortions on unmarried, unemanci-pated women under the age of eighteen. For the reas

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs in this employment discrimination action appeal from the district court’s order granting them preliminary injunctive relief. Plaintiffs also appeal from the district court’s ruling on a motion in limine involving a statute of limitations question and a related evidentiary issue. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part. T

315 F.3d 619 Victor M. JAVITCH, Receiver, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.FIRST UNION SECURITIES, INC.; Michael D'Angelo; Charles Schwab & Company, Inc.; Charles Harris; Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Company; Marcel Pope; Fifth Third/Maxus Securities, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 02-3352. No. 02-3353. No. 02-3354. No. 02-3355.

OPINION RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge. The brokerage firms and individual brokers named as defendants in four related actions have brought interlocutory appeals from the district court’s denial of their motions to compel arbitration of claims asserted by plaintiff, Victor M. Javitch, as the receiver for Viatical Escrow Services, LLC (VES), and Capital Fund Leasing, LLC (CFL).1

Moyer, C.J. For the reasons that follow, we reverse, and reinstate summary judgment for Bank One. The first question presented by this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, Bank One had a duty to disclose the fee paid to West for arranging the Blons’ loan with Bank One under the federal Truth in Lending Act, Section 1601 et seq., Title 15, U.S. Code, and regulations promulgated thereunder in Part 22

BATTISTI, Chief Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case was brought by John J. Guy, Trustee in Bankruptcy for D. Don Lowers. Prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, Mr. Lowers had been engaged in a so-called “Ponzi scheme”. See In re Ponzi, 15 F.2d 113 (D.Mass. 1926). The trustee now seeks to recover certain voidable preferences and/or fraudulent conveyances. Two proposed

ALAN E. NORRIS, J, delivered the opinion of the court, in which GILMAN, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 1032-33), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff David M. Sokol, M.D., brought federal antitrust and state law claims against defendants Akron General Medical Center (“Akron General”), Daniel P. Guy-ton, M.D., Michael A. Oddi, M.D., and Cardio-Thoracic and Vascula

[Cite as Mohler v. Univ. of Toledo Athletic Dept., 2025-Ohio-518.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO CAITLIN MOHLER Case No. 2023-00630JD Plaintiff Judge Lisa L. Sadler Magistrate Holly True Shaver v. DECISION UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO ATHLETIC DEPT

[Cite as Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2020-Ohio-4856.] THE CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, A Case No. 2019-00789PQ DIVISION OF GANNETT GP MEDIA, INC. Special Master Jeff Clark Requester REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Respondent The Ohio Public Records Act (PRA) {¶1} “Public records are one

BOGGS, Circuit Judge. In 2009, officers of the Farmington Hills Police Department (“FHPD”) approached Robert Zucker at his residence in an attempt to convince Zucker to accompany them to a nearby hospital for mental-health treatment. A physical confrontation ensued and officers forcibly detained *557Zucker, shocking him with a taser in the process. Zucker subsequently

854 F.2d 852 57 USLW 2106 AKRON CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, an Ohio corporation;Max Pierre Gaujean, M.D., individually and on behalf of hispatients; Patty Poe, a minor, individually and on behalf ofall other similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Lynn SLABY, etc.; et al., Defendants,v.STATE OF OHIO, Intervenor-Appellant. No. 86-3664.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [111] JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge This case arises out of the murder of Shelly Hilliard (a transgender woman, née Henry Hilliard). The decédent’s mother *730Lyniece Nelson brought substantive due process, wrongful death, and interference with familial relations claim

OPINION BERNICE B. DONALD, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Anthony Rorrer appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment on his claims against the City of Stow, Ohio for disability discrimination and impermissible retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), similar discrimination claims under Ohio law,

[Cite as Smith v. Ohio State Univ. Office of Compliance & Integrity, 2022-Ohio-2659.] SCOTT ELLIOT SMITH Case No. 2021-00400PQ Requester Special Master Jeff Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE AND INTEGRITY Respondent {¶1} “In order to ensure that government performs effectively and properly,