Cases

ORDER Gianco Sheridan was convicted after a jury trial of money laundering and conspiring to commit that offense. His cousin was dealing marijuana and, at Sheridan’s urging, had directed a repeat customer to *494make payments by depositing currency into Sheridan’s bank accounts for the cousin’s benefit. Sheridan argues that the government did not introduce sufficient evidence t

188 S.W.3d 55 (2006) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard SHERIDAN, Defendant/Appellant. No. ED 85090. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. February 21, 2006. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied April 10, 2006. *58 N. Scott Rosenblum, Mark W. Lyons and Nellie Ribaudo,

214 Cal.App.3d 774 (1989) 263 Cal. Rptr. 129 CAROLINE B. BOGERT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GRAY DAVIS, as State Controller, etc., Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. C005601. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. September 21, 1989. *775 COUNSEL Guy G. Gibson for Plaintiff and Appellant

824 P.2d 560 (1992) Charles E. BREDTHAUER and Cindy S. Bredthauer, Husband and Wife, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. CHRISTIAN, SPRING, SEILBACH AND ASSOCIATES, a Montana Corporation; TSP, a Wyoming Corporation; Davis Surveying, a Wyoming Corporation; the Board of County Commissioners of Campbell County; Harry Underwood; W.B. Fitch; and B.L. Tarver, Appellees (Defendants). No. 91-78. Supreme Court of Wyomi

OAKES, Circuit Judge: In this diversity action Nike, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert J. Ward, Judge, following a jury trial in which Nike was found liable to S & K Sales Co. (“S & K”) for either participating in or knowingly accepting the benefits of a breach of fiduciary duty owed to

723 P.2d 1230 (1986) WYMO FUELS, INC., Appellant (Respondent), Environmental Quality Council, Department of Environmental Quality, (Respondents) v. Guy W. EDWARDS, Ruth A. Edwards, Clarke K. Mills, and Doris I. Mills, Appellees (Petitioners). ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Appellants (Respondents), WYMO Fuels, Inc., (Respondent), v. Guy W. EDWARDS, Ruth A. Edwards, Clarke K. Mills, and Dori

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PRYCE M. CAMPBELL, III, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D2023-0651 March 26, 2025 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christine Marlewski and Paul L. Huey,

771 N.W.2d 883 (2009) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Jose Miguel CHAVARRIA-CRUZ, Appellant. No. A08-1036. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. September 8, 2009. *885 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Linda K. Jenny, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respon

OPINION STRAS, Justice. Based on a homicide that occurred during an aggravated robbery, a jury found appellant Nisius Dealvin McAllister guilty of first-degree premeditated murder and first-degree felony murder. The district court entered a judgment of conviction of first-degree premeditated murder, and sentenced McAllister to life imprisonment without the

HIGGINS, J., On March 14, 2007, the Plaintiff, Hospitality Associates of Tannersville, L.P. (hereinafter “Hospitality”), filed a complaint against the defendant, Aaron and Wright Technical Services and LandAmerica Assessment Coiporation (hereinafter “LandAmerica”). Hospitality seeks recovery of funds that were expended due to reliance on an allegedly erroneous property evaluation provided by LandAmerica to Marathon Asset Manageme

HILL, Justice. [T1] Plaintiff Jerome Stocki was a passenger in a vehicle involved in a two-vehicle collision and filed a complaint against both drivers alleging that their negligence caused him serious injury and damages. Shortly before trial, both drivers admitted liability and agreed to an equal apportionment of fault, but they continued to contest damages. Plaintiff asked for an award of damages in the range of $164,000 t

MR. JUSTICE HASWELL delivered the Opinion of the Court. This is an appeal by defendants, Guy P. Burnett and Martha E. Burnett, his wife, from a final judgment of the district court of Missoula County following that court’s denial of defendants’ exceptions and motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was entered wherein the court foun

784 N.W.2d 355 (2010) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. José Miguel CHAVARRIA-CRUZ, Appellant. No. A08-1036. Supreme Court of Minnesota. June 30, 2010. *357 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Linda K. Jenny, Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for resp

Dwyer, J. ¶1 Trials matter. The results of trials matter. The manner in which a trial takes place, the evidence admitted, and the judicial rulings made all matter. In this case, the plaintiff, Steven Lodis, being already unhappy with the results of two separate jury trials arising from causes of action asserted in the complaint herein, finds himself similarly disaffected by the resu

303 F.Supp.2d 94 (2004) Alicia DELK, Plaintiff, v. GO VERTICAL, INC., a/k/a "Go Vertical," Defendant. No. CIV.A. 3:02-CV-1310. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 3, 2004. David M. Sheridan, Kenneth J. Levine, Levy & Droney, P.C., Farmington, CT, William H. Cooper, White Plains, NY, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey C. Pingpank, Paul A. Croce, II,

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2021 IL App (1st) 190263 No. 1-19-0263 Opinion filed March 25, 2021 FOURTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge This case involves a dispute arising out of a July 2012 personal services contract between defendant Luis Miguel Gallego Basteri (“Miguel” or “defendant”), a world-renowned music artist, and plaintiff William . Brockhaus (“Brockhaus” or “plaintiff’), for Brockhaus to serve as Miguel’s personal manager.

Appelwick, J. ¶1 — After being fired from Corbis Corporation, Lodis sued Corbis and its chief executive officer, Gary Shenk, claiming age discrimination and retaliation under the Washington Law Against Discrimination, chapter 49.60 RCW. Corbis counterclaimed, alleging Lodis’s unjust enrichment, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of *842fiduciary duty as a Corbis off

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any May 23 2019, 10:53 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court