Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

557 F.3d 243 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Corey L. GUTHRIE, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 07-6215, 07-6286. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 22, 2009. Decided and Filed: March 2, 2009. *245 ARGUED: Patrick J. Renn, Law Offices, Lo

MEMORANDUM ** Blame Guthrie appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to dismiss the indictment and to suppress the statements she gave to National Park Service (“NPS”) Rangers during her detention. Guthrie contends the district court erred in denying her motion to dismiss the indictment and suppress her statements because the 27-hour delay between her arrest and initial appearance before a mag

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0076p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

MEMORANDUM *** 1. Because the defendant did not object to the special condition of supervised release before the district court, we review for plain error. See United States v. Bahe, 201 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir.2000). The district court did not plainly err in imposing as a condition of supervised release the requirement that defendant “participate in a mental health evaluation upon request of the

DECISION and ORDER MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge. The plaintiffs seek to recover certain taxes paid to the United States and also to abate an additional assessment; the defendant has counter-claimed to recover the unpaid balance of such assessment. The action was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, on June 1, 1970. Post-trial briefs have been submitted by both sides. <

U.S. v. Guthrie UNITED STATES, Appellee v. James D. GUTHRIE, Staff Sergeant U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant No. 99-0306 Crim. App. No. 95-1697 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued January 12, 2000 Decided June 12, 2000 CRAWFORD, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GIERKE and EFFRON, JJ., and COX, S.J., joined. SULLIVAN, J., filed an opinion con

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

264 F.Supp. 840 (1967) Kathryn GUTHRIE, Plaintiff. v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 2032. United States District Court W. D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. March 2, 1967. *841 Hardin, Barton, Hardin & Jesson, Fort Smith, Ark., for plaintiff. Robert L. Waters, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Ft. Worth

OPINION AND ORDER GRUBB, Senior District Judge. This action is brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act which gives this court jurisdiction. The action arises out of an automobile accident occurring on May 29, 1961 at about 4:43 P.M. at the intersection of Highway 59 and Sunset Drive, Waukesha County, in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. A United States Army Chevrolet car driven by Se

GRUBB, District Judge. Defendant, Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., has moved to dismiss the action as against it. The parties having waived oral argument, the motion has been submitted on the moving papers and briefs. In the amended complaint plaintiff seeks recovery against the government for the allegedly negligent operation of an automobile by one George M. Liebl, a sergeant in the United Sta

SHELBOURNE, District Judge. The plaintiffs in each of the seven above-styled cases were partners, or the personal representatives of partners in the Harlan Fuel Company, a partnership engaged in mining, processing and selling coal at Yancey in Harlan County, Kentucky. The actions were brought for the recovery of additional taxes and interest paid by plaintiffs under deficiency assessments for the fiscal years 1953, 1954, and

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

557 F.Supp.2d 522 (2008) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Rodney REPKO, Plaintiff, v. GUTHRIE CLINIC, P.C., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:04-CV-1556. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. March 12, 2008. *524 Joseph Robert Rydzewski, Spall, Rydzewski & Anderson, P.C., Leatrice A. Anderson, Law Office of Jo

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Howard Paul Guthrie appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his plea of guilty to a one-count superseding information charging him with concealment of assets in a bankruptcy proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(1). Specifically, Guthrie contests the district court’s two-level

[Cite as Guthrie v. Guthrie, 2024-Ohio-5581.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JILL GUTHRIE, : APPEAL NO. C-240245 TRIAL NO. 2022001597 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : OPIN

814 F.Supp. 942 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert W. GUTHRIE, Defendant. No. CR-92-168-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. January 13, 1993. *943 Leslie R. Weatherhead of Witherspoon, Kelly, Davenport & Toole, Spokane, WA, for defendant. Phillip H. Warren and James J. Sowers of U.S.