Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 31 2018, 5:52 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

Eva M. Guzman, Justice Workplace discrimination and harassment cases are some of the most sensitive and difficult to resolve. The conduct complained about in these types of cases is often so offensive that "it is easy to understand that a sense of decency initially inclines one to want to grant relief." 1 But anti-discrimination laws target "discriminat

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT UNION BANK’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Union Bank’s Motion to Dismiss (DE # 1355), filed April 20, 2011. Therein, Defendant seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (DE # 1317), claiming both that 1) Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Natio

878 F.Supp. 1209 (1995) Marquelle MILLER, by his next friend, Cynthia Miller; Cynthia Miller; Angela Gray, by her next friend, Zachery Gray; Zachery Gray; Shon Richardson, by his next friend, George Richardson; George Richardson; Latrisha Henry, by her next friend, Faye Henry; Faye Henry; Reigne Barrett, by her next friend, Valerie Barrett; and Valerie Barrett, Plaintiffs, v. John T. BENSON, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Defendant.</

95 P.3d 34 (2004) 140 Idaho 416 Vera VENDELIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 29080. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2004 Term. July 1, 2004. *39 Eberle Berlin Kading Turnbow & McKlveen, Chtd., Boise, for appellant. Warre

Case: 17-20364 Document: 00515108825 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 6, 2019 No. 17-20364

Dear Mr. Austin: Your office has requested our opinion regarding the legality of several grants made by the Plaquemines Parish Government (the "Parish") to the following organizations or programs: the Y.M.C.A., the Audubon Institute, the Plaquemines Volunteer Residential Rehabilitation Corporation, the New Orleans Area Council Boy Scouts of America, the Southeast Louisiana Girl Scout Council, the Parish Aid Program, and the Scholarship Program. We have received a copy of a memo

110 Cal.Rptr.2d 441 (2001) 26 Cal.4th 598 28 P.3d 175 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ronald Harold SEATON, Defendant and Appellant. No. S011425. Supreme Court of California. August 9, 2001. As Modified September 26, 2001. *458 James T. Fousekis, Roger R. M

OPINION AND ORDER Debra M. Brown, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of Brown v. Board of Education, holding that “in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.” 347 U.S. 483, 495, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (“Brown I”). A year later, on May "31, 1955, the Supreme' Court i

N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. ¶1. The Petitioners in this case are various Wisconsin students, parents, teachers, school districts, school board members, citizens, and the president of the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC).1 The Petitioners collec*599tively challenge the constitutionality of the state school finance system under Wis. Stat.

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA William Penn School District; : Panther Valley School District; : The School District of Lancaster; : Greater Johnstown School District; : Wilkes-Barre Area School District; : Shenandoah Valley School District; : Jamella and Bryant Miller, parents of : K.M., a minor; Sheila Armstrong, : parent of S.A., minor; Tracey Hughes, : parent of P.M.H., minor; Pennsylvania : Association of R

Opinion GEORGE, J. This case reaches us again after a retrial following this court’s reversal of defendant’s convictions. At the initial trial in 1980, a jury found defendant Rodney James Alcala guilty of first degree murder, with a kidnapping-murder special circumstance, and other related offenses. Following the jury’s penalty-phase verdict, defendant was sentenced to death. In reversing defendant’s conviction

797 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2011) In re CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Larsen v. Union Bank, N.A., S.D. Fla. Case No. 1:09-cv-23235-JLK, N.D. Cal. Case No. 4:09-cv-3250. Case No. 1:09-MD-2036-JLK. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 13, 2011. *1324 Robert Cecil Gilbert, Miami, FL, for Checking A

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

518 U.S. 515 (1996) UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA et al. No. 94-1941. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 17, 1996. Decided June 26, 1996.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT *517 *517 *518

934 F.Supp. 1533 (1996) Robert A. REED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James A. RHODES, et al., Defendants. No. 1:73 CV 1300. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 8, 1996. *1534 *1535 Thomas I. Atkins, Brooklyn, NY, James L. Hardiman, Cleveland, Ohio, David W. Whitaker, Beach

237 F.3d 81 (2nd Cir. 2000) ELISHA D. HACK, JEREMY A. HERSHMAN, BATSHEVA GREER, and LISA B. FRIEDMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.THE PRESIDENT and FELLOWS OF YALE COLLEGE d/b/a YALE CORPORATION and YALE UNIVERSITY, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, and BETTY TRACHTENBERG, Defendants-Appellees,THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, Amicus Curiae,THE CATHOLIC LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS & CIVIL RIGHTS, Movant. Docket No. 98-9136August T

GOLDEN, Chief Justice. The question before us is the constitutionality of Wyoming’s public school finance system. Four Wyoming school districts (Campbell County School District No. One, Uinta County School District No. One, Sweetwater County School Districts Nos. One and Two) brought suit in January 1992, against the State of Wyoming, the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State Board of Education and others

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

478 U.S. 421 (1986) LOCAL 28 OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ET AL. No. 84-1656. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 25, 1986 Decided July 2, 1986 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *425 Mar