Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 21-55175 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:20-cv-02599- PSG-SP MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Cour

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiff, a prisoner incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in El Reno, Oklahoma, filed a pro se complaint that was dismissed by the Court 1 on June 10, 2009 because plaintiff faile

439 F.3d 1149 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Leonar Nellino Segura PERLAZA, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gustavo Salazar Palacios, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hugo Marquez, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Walter Roman Solis-Barnaza, aka Jose Walter Rodman Solis Barnaza, Defe

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, in favor of appellees in an action for damages instituted by the United States against each of the defendant-appellees here involved for violation of Ceiling Price Regulation 142 during the peri

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1355 BROC T. WALTERMEYER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin; DIANE L. KISLER, Physician, FCI Berlin, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Landy

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1857 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NYCOLE AMAURY ROSARIO SÁNCHEZ, t/n Nyckole Amaury Rosario Sánchez, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa,

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. David Ashe (“Plaintiff’) alleges to have been the victim of age discrimination at the hands of his former employers Carva-jal S.A.; Distribuidora Norma, Inc.; and Editorial Norma S.A. In addition to several remedies under state law, Plaintiff seeks compensation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). See 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634.

OPINION AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions: defendants’ G & W Transport Ltd. (“G & W”) and Caribbean Transport Ltd. (“CTL”) motion for summary judgment, (Docket No. 30), and plaintiff Jerome Francis’s (“Francis”) motion to strike various exhibits introduced by defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment. (Docket No. 53.)

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Presently before the court is a motion for remand filed by the former directors and officers of a failed bank under receivership of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) (Docket No. 16). The FDIC opposed the motion (Docket No. 23). A reply was 'subsequently filed (Docket No. 40) and a surreply was tendered (Docket No. 43-1). After revie

MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) and 60(d)(3). Plaintiff Charles E. Hughes, along with six other plaintiffs, brought individual actions under the

Judgment rendered January 10, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 55,462-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1871 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JOSÉ CARTAGENA, t/n José Ruben Cartagena-Rodríguez, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Pedro A. Delgado-Hernández, U.S. District Judge]

Smith, J. (dissenting). People v LaFontaine (92 NY2d 470 [1998]) was a mistake, and a serious one — so serious that in the 13 years since LaFontaine was decided we have never followed it, though we have had several cases that called for its application. The People argue here that LaFontaine should be overruled. I had hoped that this would provide the occasio

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. This case stands in a long line of claims brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) against directors and officers of banks throughout the United States. To date, the FDIC has filed thirty-three such suits in its capacity as a receiver. In sum, the FDIC became Westernbank’s receiver on April 30, 2010. W Holding Company (“W

*200 MEMORANDUM OPINION GUSTAVO A. GELPI, District Judge. Several former Westernbank directors and officers (“the D & O’s”)1 brought a third-party complaint against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“the FDIC”) and the United States of America (“United States”) (collectively “Defendants”) under the Fed

MEMORANDUM OPINION BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. This action involves numerous claims among the FDIC as receiver of Westernbank (“FDIC-R”), former directors and officers of Westernbank (collectively, “D & Os”), various insurers, and the FDIC in its corporate capacity (“FDIC-C”). This case was referred for an initial scheduling conference. (Docket No. 305). Prior to the co

DRONEY, Circuit Judge: On September 14, 2010, David H. Brooks was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Seybert, J.) after a jury trial on multiple counts of offenses relating to securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, and obstruction of justice. He was also convicted of related tax offenses based on his guilty pleas, which occurred after the jury’s verdict. Shortly before trial,

257 F.Supp.2d 498 (2003) Efrain CLAUDIO GOTAY, et al Plaintiffs v. BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD, et al Defendants No. CIV. 01-1088(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 10, 2003. *500 Alberto G. Estrella, Antonio E. Valiente and Kenneth C. Suria-Rivera, Esqs. William Estrella Law Firm, Enrique A. Mirandes, Esq.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. PREFACE In today’s case (more procedurally complicated than substantively complex), a district judge issued an order requiring Char-tis Insurance Company to advance defense costs to former directors and officers of Westernbank of Puerto Rico, who find themselves in the cross-hairs of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FD

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Ponce de Leon Hospitality Corp. (“H.I. Ponce”) and H.I. Mayagüez, Inc. (“HI. Mayagüez”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), brought the instant action against Avalon Logistics Inc., et ah1 pursuant to the Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act and its’ attendant regulation2, for the loss or