Cases

TRANSFER ORDER JOHN F. NANGLE, Chairman. This litigation presently consists of 160 actions pending in five districts and listed on the attached Schedule A as follows: 129 actions Western District of Wisconsin 12 actions Eastern District of Wisconsin 7 actions Northern District of Illinois 8 actions Western District of Michigan

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carrier Corporation (“Carrier”) commenced this litigation on July 19, 2012, against defendants Goodman Global, Inc., Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P., Goodman Global Holdings, Inc., Goodman Distribution, Inc., and Goodman Sales Company (collectively, “Goodman”) alleging patent infringement. (D.I. 1) Goodman answered the co

FILED COURT OF APPEALS 11 2015 APR 28 AN 8: 35

Meadowbrook Pointe Dev. Corp. v F&G Concrete & Brick Indus., Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 01669) Meadowbrook Pointe Dev. Corp. v F&G Concrete & Brick Indus., Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 01669 Decided on March 29, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department <

796 F.Supp.2d 1025 (2011) VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PRIMARION, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. C-08-05129 JCS. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 4, 2011. *1035 Brian Joseph Keating, James W. Morando, Jeffrey M. Fisher, John L. Cooper, Racheal Turner, Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San

665 F.Supp.2d 1142 (2009) BRITZ FERTILIZERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BAYER CORPORATION; Bayer CropScience, LP; et al., Defendants. No. 1:06-CV-00287-OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. October 16, 2009. *1147 Eric J. Sousa, George Pete Rodarakis, Roger M. Schrimp, Damrell Nelson Schrimp Pallios Pacher and Silva PC

104 F.Supp.2d 427 (2000) CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A.96-3153(JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. July 12, 2000. *428 *429 Susan S. Singer, Singer & Groger, Newark, NJ, Roberta Jacobs-Meadway, Jordan A.

51 Cal.App.4th 1090 (1996) PAPER SAVERS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN DAVID NACSA et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B097130. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven. December 19, 1996. *1092 COUNSEL Moser & Sanders and Teresa M. Sanders for Plaintiff and Appellant.

53 F.Supp.2d 1361 (1999) FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. HARBERT-YEARGIN, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A.1:97CV0449AJEC. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. July 9, 1999. *1362 James McDonald, Christopher D. Balch, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff. Trammel Cul

Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge Court No. 22-00205 WANXIANG AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [ Wanxiang’s Motion to Dismiss is denied. ]

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE INTERMEC IP CORP., and ) INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs- ) Counterclaim Defendants, ) ) C.A. No. N20C-03-254 v. ) PRW CCLD ) TRANSCORE, LP, and TRANSCORE ) HOLDINGS, INC., )

146 July 15, 2020 No. 9 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION POWEREX CORP., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. (TC 5339) On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, Plaintiff argued that it was not a “public utility” and therefore O

OPINION W. FRANK CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S., delivered the opinion of the court, in which DAVID R. FARMER, J. joined and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., concurs with Partial Separate Concurrence. Plaintiff corporation sued former employees/officers alleging breach of non-compete agreements, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, unfair competition, intentional inducement to breach

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOLLOWING TRIAL FINDING THE TRUSTEE MAY AVOID CONSTRUCTIVELY FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND RECOVER THEIR VALUE FROM THE DEFENDANT Dale L. Somers, United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, as Trustee (Trustee) of Brooke Corporation (Brooke Corp), Brooke Capital Corporation (f/k/a Brooke Franchise Corporation) and Brooke Investments, Inc., seeks to avoid as constructivel

14-4083-cv Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. 1 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ______________ 5 6 August Term, 2015 7 8 (Argued: October 8, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2016) 9

J-A08026-16 2016 PA Super 274 PROFESSIONAL FLOORING COMPANY, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF INC. PENNSYLVANIA v. BUSHAR CORPORATION APPEAL OF: ROSE LINE, INC. No. 1594 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Order Entered April 21, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Civil Division at No(s): 05-2

284 F.Supp.2d 964 (2003) MORRIS SILVERMAN MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Counterdefendant, v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant, Counterplaintiff. No. 01 C 1688. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 19, 2003. *965 *966

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GONZALEZ, ENOCH, SPECTOR, BAKER, ABBOTT and HANKINSON, Justices, join. The primary issue presented is whether at common law a surety owes a duty of good faith to its principal. The court of appeals, holding that this duty existed, affirmed the trial court’s judgment for the principal against its surety for bad fait

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TRUSTWAVE HOLDINGS, INC. ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BEAZLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., ) and LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY ) Defendants. ) ______________________________

CARNEY, Circuit Judge: We confront here a nettlesome and increasingly contentious question about the import of a foreign corporation’s registration to conduct business and appointment of an agent for service of process in a state for the exercise of personal jurisdiction by that state’s courts over the registered corporation. Here, the state is Connecticut, and the terms of its registration and appointment statutes are unclear