Cases

257 S.W.3d 504 (2008) PALESTINE HERALD-PRESS CO., Newspaper Holdings, Inc., and Scott Tyler, Appellants v. Mark ZIMMER, Appellee. No. 12-07-00139-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. June 25, 2008. *506 James M. McCown, J. Brian Dear, Addison, TX, for Appellant. Charles H. Clark, Tyler, TX, for Appellee. Panel cons

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 26, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00331-CV GRIFFITH TRUCK & EQUIPMENT, INC. AND BRUCE GRIFFITH, Appellants V. FLASH TANK SERVICES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texa

474 F.Supp.2d 737 (2007) Marguerite J. SOUFFLAS, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-4753. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 21, 2007. *738 *739 *740 John P. Kopesky, Sheller Ludwig & Badey, Philadelphia, P

NO. 12-07-00139-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PALESTINE HERALD-PRESS CO., NEWSPAPER HOLDINGS, INC., AND § APPEAL FROM THE 2ND SCOTT TYLER, APPELLANTS V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MARK ZIMMER, APPELLEE § CHEROKEE COUNTY,

NO. 12-07-00139-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PALESTINE HERALD-PRESS CO., NEWSPAPER HOLDINGS, I

MEMORANDUM OPINION REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Judge. Defendants Zimmer, Inc. and its affiliates (“Defendants” or “Zimmer”) are manufacturers of the Zimmer NexGen knee implant devices that are the subject of this multidistrict litigation (“MDL”). In this motion, Defendants seek authority under certain conditions to contact prospective expert witnesses who also happen to be treating physician

88 F.Supp.2d 38 (2000) Diane GORDON, Plaintiff, v. Edward GRIFFITH, individually and in his capacity as New York State Assemblyman to the 40th Assembly District, Defendant. No. CV 99-5106. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 16, 2000. Joseph A. Grob, Moskowitz & Book, LLP, New York City, for Plaintiff. Attorney General Eliot Spitzer by Judi

Judge Max N. Tobias, Jr. The ultimate issue in this lawsuit relates to the bidding process under Louisiana’s Public Lease Law, La. R.S. 41:1211, et seq. The plaintiff, Two Canal Street Investors, Inc. (“TCSI”), appeals the trial court’s judgment, dismissing as of non-suit its lawsuit for its failure to post security for costs pursuant to La. R.S. 13:1215. Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in order

_[iMQORE, J. Francis Morgan appeals a judgment that dismissed her suit on an exception of prescription in favor of the defendant, TriState Foods L.P. d/b/a County Market 9304. We reverse and remand. Procedural Background On March 7, 2000, Ms. Morgan was rolling a shopping basket near the check-out area of the County Market store on Louisville Avenue in Monroe. She slipped, a

Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Remanded, and Memorandum Opinion filed January 12, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00727-CV WILLOW CREEK GOLF CLUB, INC., Appellant V. WILLOW CREEK MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 281st District Court Harris Coun

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 17, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00018-CV TENDEKA, INC., Appellant V. NINE ENERGY SERVICE LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Co

MEMORANDUM McHugh, United States District Judge This is a straightforward case arising out of a construction site accident, brought by a Pennsylvania worker who was injured on a public works project in New Jersey. The general contractor responsible for the project is a New Jersey corporation, and the roofing firm that employed Plaintiff was retained under .a subcontract specifically calling for the applic

The relator, D.W. Griffith, Inc., is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. In July, 1920, it applied to the Secretary of State of New York for permission to do business in this State. Its authorized capital stock consisted of 500,000 shares of no par value. At the time the relator began to do business in this State, the Tax Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 60, section 181) provided: "Every foreign corporation * * * doing business in this state, shall pay to the state tre

Van Kirk, P. J. The relator, D. W. Griffith, Inc., is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Maryland, June 30, 1920. The authorized capital was 500,000 shares of stock having no stated par value, called “ no par stock.” Application was made to the Secretary of State of New York on July 6,1920, for permission to do business in this State. On July 9, 1920, the Secretary issued a certificate of permission. At that time,

OPINION WEIS, Circuit Judge. This action grew out of business disputes marked by sharp disagreements over asserted trade secrets and contractual obligations. A jury resolved multiple issues leaving but one count which has been appealed. The principal questions before us are whether, under Pennsylvania law, a fraudulent misrepresentation is to be treated as a tort or breach of contract and wheth

OPINION BY FITZGERALD, J.: Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Erin McDonald, appeals from the order entered in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas denying her motion for partial sum *102 mary judgment adverse to Appel-lees/Cross-Appellants, Whitewater Challengers, Inc., a Pennsylvan

Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. I. Background Christie Adams (Adams) filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (circuit court) alleging that she had been subjected to employment discrimination in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 378-2. The discriminatory act claimed by Adams was CDM Media, USA, Inc.’s (CDM) decision not to hire Adams due to her age. CDM’s mo

Davis, Justice: This appeal originates from a dispute between a pharmacy network administrator and various West Virginia pharmacies that are network members. Stemming from an order of the Circuit Court of McDowell County that refused to compel arbitration, this appeal raises three dispositive issues challenging the circuit court’s rulings as to: (1) whether a contractual choice of

609 F.3d 191 (2010) Rajae NINO, Appellant v. The JEWELRY EXCHANGE, INC.; Wendy Tarapani. No. 09-1268. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued December 1, 2009. Opinion Filed June 15, 2010. *196 Terri L. Griffiths, Esq. [Argued], Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, USVI, for Appellant. Jessica Chung

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 29, 2008) Before the Court is the motion of the Jewelry Exchange, Incorporated d/b/a Diamonds International (“Diamonds”) and Wendy Tarapani (“Tarapani”) to dismiss the above-captioned matter. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the motion. I. FACTS On October 6, 2000, Ra