Cases

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: Florida prisoner Michael Griffin asks us to reconsider the single-judge order denying him a certificate of appealability (COA). He argues that jurists of reason could debate whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) and 60(b)(6) permit him to challenge the district court’s judgment denying his § 2254 petition by seeking a retroactive application

Case: 14-14851 Date Filed: 05/28/2015 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-14851-P ________________________ MICHAEL ALLEN GRIFFIN, Pe

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-2677 _____________________________ DERRICK D. GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. William R. Slaughter, J

KEITH BRYANT * NO. 2023-C-0786 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, * THROUGH THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC * SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS; STATE OF LOUISIANA SECRETARY JAMES W. ******* LEBLANC, ANGELA GRIFFIN AND OTHER UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS ON SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE CIVIL DISTRICT C

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to decide whether Pennsylvania’s statute of limitations is tolled while a prisoner exhausts administrative remedies prior to filing a civil rights lawsuit as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), or in the alternative, whether federal equitable

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: Alfred Rhiner, a Florida prisoner, appeals the sua sponte dismissal with prejudice of his pro se civil rights complaint against various prison officials and healthcare providers under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). He asks us to reverse the district court’s dismissal or allow him to amend his complaint. Because Rhiner’s complaint stated a deliberate indifference claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against ce

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ Nos. 21-2655 & 22-2027 ____________ LACEY STRADFORD; WILLIAM NETTLES; JESSE STROUD; WILLIAM SCOTT; RICHARD RICHARDSON, on behalf of THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTME

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-12532 Date Filed: 04/25/2018 Page: 1 of 19 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-12532 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12

PER CURIAM: Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Alfred Alvarez sued more than a dozen defendants. Plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pau-peris, and the district court granted the motion. The district court dismissed Plaintiffs claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), which permits a district court to dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint sua sponte if the complaint fails to state a cla

ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. In a single killing spree Jerry Correll murdered four victims, including his ex-wife and their five-year old daughter. Correll petitions for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 71) and challenges the validity of both his convictions for four murders and his four death sentences. Correll asserts numerous errors allegedly committed b

ORDER CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL, District Judge. This case is before the Court on the Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief (Doc. No. 1) filed by Richard E. Lynch. Pursuant to the instructions of the Court, Respondents filed a Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 18). Thereafter, Petitioner filed a Reply to the Response (Doc. No. 23). As discussed hereinafter, the habeas petiti

PER CURIAM: Richard Hamilton, a prisoner on Florida’s death row, has filed a motion for a certificate of appealability (COA). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). He argues that jurists of reason could debate whether the district court properly denied the motions he filed under Rules 60(b) and 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Those motions contended that,

HULL, Circuit Judge: On February 1, 2016, Petitioner Cary Lambrix filed a motion for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in this Court. Lambrix, a Florida prisoner sentenced to death, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b).” Although Lambrix’s initial 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition was denied in 1992, Lambrix’

*826Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION We are asked to decide whether there is a constitutionally protected liberty interest that prohibits the State from continuing to house inmates in solitary confinement 1 on death row after they have been gran

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

601 F.Supp.2d 1267 (2009) Scott MANSFIELD, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents. Case No. 6:05-cv-1466-Orl-31KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 26, 2009. *1274 James L. Driscoll, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Tampa, FL, for Petitioner.

OPINION * PER CURIAM. Marcellus Jones, a Pennsylvania inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, *592appeals from the District Court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants. For the reasons set forth below, we will summarily affirm. I. In May and June of 2011, Jones