Cases

ORDER JORGE’A. SOLIS, District Judge. Now before the Court are: (a) Plaintiff Lincoln National Life Insurance Company’s (“Lincoln”) Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 160]; (b) Third Party Defendants Management Compensation Group Lee, Inc., John Ridings Lee, John Ridings Lee Company, Inc.’s (collectively “Lee”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [doc. 162]; (c) Third Party Defendant James Glenn Turner, Jr

691 F.Supp.2d 946 (2010) TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C 06-110-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. March 8, 2010. *947 Aaron

625 F.Supp.2d 702 (2009) TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C 06-110-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. June 8, 2009. *703 Gregor

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING LINCOLN’S MOTION TO STRIKE MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. [[Image here]] *648[[Image here]] I. INTRODUCTION This litigation involves United States Patent No. 7,089,201 B1 (the '201 patent), which is entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVI

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REAGAN, District Judge. I. Factual and Procedural Background On February 5, 2008, Plaintiff, Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln”), filed suit against Defendants, Bobby Barton (“Barton”), JoAnn Gant (“Gant”) and Gregory Lowry (“Lowry”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1335 and 1397 and 29 U.S.C. § 1132. This action arises from a dispute ov

Per Curiam: This is the last phase of the liability determination portion of an action brought for the recovery of overpayment of federal income taxes and assessed interest thereon for each of the years 1958 through 1965, together with interest thereon as provided by law. Originally, the case involved numerous issues, but all except the six before the court today have previously been settled or resolved. The si

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GERONTA FUNDING, a Delaware § Statutory Trust, § § No. 380, 2021 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below – Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. §

MARTIN, John C., Judge. Summary judgment is appropriate in a declaratory judgment action if there is no genuine issue of material fact, and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N. C. Association of ABC *351Boards v. Hunt, 76 N.C. App. 290, 292, 332 S.E.2d 693, 694, disc. review denied, 314 N.C. 667, 336 S.E.2d 400 (1985).

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STILLWATER MINING ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N20C-04-190 AML CCLD v. ) CONSOLIDATED ) NATIONAL UNION FIRE ) INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) PITTSBURGH, PA., ACE ) AMERICAN INSURA

DECISION AND ORDER McMAHON, District Judge. The court, for its rulings in limine on the motions filed by U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) arid PHL Variable Life Insurance Company (“Phoenix”) (see Docket ## 179, 182 in No. 13 Civ. 1580 and Docket ## 386, 389 in No. 12 Civ. 6811), and on an untimely motion for judgment by the pleadings filed by Phoenix, (see Docket # 398

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0096p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - TOMMY G. MOR

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. PNC Bank appeals a jury verdict in favor of special deputy receiver Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C., and a group of state guaranty associations (together, Appellees). The jury found PNC liable for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty in violation of its duties as trustee of various preneed trusts created by National Prearranged Services, Inc. On ap

366 F.Supp.2d 140 (2005) Robert H. SHECKLEY, Plaintiff v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN, et al., Defendants No. CIV.04-109-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 17, 2005. *141 Randall B. Weill, Gregory Paul Hansel, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau, Pachios & Haley, LLC, Portland, ME, for Rob

317 F.3d 629 VENCOR, INC., d/b/a Vencor Kentucky, Inc., d/b/a Vencor Hospital-Louisville and d/b/a Vencor Hospital-Chattanooga, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STANDARD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-5435. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued August 6, 2002. Decided and Filed January 21, 2003.

2024 WI App 8 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2022AP1158 †Petition for Review Filed Complete Title of Case: OCONOMOWOC AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. GREGORY L. COTA, JEFFREY M. COTA

559 F.3d 425 (2009) Tommy G. MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-4186. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: September 17, 2008. Decided and Filed: March 12, 2009. *428 ARGUED: Thomas M. Peterson, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, San Francisco, Cali

ACCEPTED 12-14-00123-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/16/2015 4:39:11 PM

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellant Bertha Gregory was the plaintiff below and appeals from a summary judgment in appellee’s favor. She was the beneficiary in an insurance policy on the life of her son, Daniel Eans, covering death by accidental means. The policy excluded payment in case of death resulting “from the insured’s commission of, or attempt to commit, an assault or felony.” Appellee moved for summary

931 F.2d 351 Gregory PITTS, a Minor, By and Through His Father and NextFriend, George PITTS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.AMERICAN SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. No. 90-1170. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 21, 1991. Thomas D. Bourdeaux, Bo

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge: This insurance coverage dispute requires the interpretation of an insurance policy’s Pollution Exclusion clause and a Contractors Limitation Endorsement Clause. Finding no error in the district *447court’s conclusion that coverage was barred by the first clause and not resurrected by the latter one, we AFFIRM. I. BACKGRO