Cases

SILER, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COLE, J., and DOWD, D.J., joined. COLE, J. (pg. 555), delivered a separate concurring opinion. OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Gregory Bell appeals the district court’ denial of a sentence modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In 2003, Bell pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, posses

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Gregory Lamont Brooks, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-002301 Appeal From Lexington County Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5693 Heard October 14, 2019 – Filed November 20, 2019 AFFIRMED Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wil

349 S.C. 372 (2002) 563 S.E.2d 336 The STATE, Respondent, v. Charles Edward WATSON, II, Appellant. No. 25463. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard April 4, 2002. Decided May 6, 2002. *374 Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, o

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Victor Vasquez, Nadeem Sheikh, Katia Sadoudi, Svetlana Bautista, Ibrahima Ba, Nicholas Miano, Pa M. Njie, Michael Amegnaglo, and David Berger (collectively, "Plaintiffs") are former Store Team Leaders for various Whole Foods grocery stores in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. They bring this action against Defendants Whole

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: A jury awarded $1,312,665.35 to Colonial Trading, LLC (“Colonial”) on its breach of contract claim against Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. (“Bassett”) based on a dispute involving recalled baby cribs. The jury also awarded Colonial $41,472.08 on its North Carolina Unfa

358 S.C. 122 (2004) 595 S.E.2d 248 Richard N. KENNEDY, Appellant, v. Scott Edward GRIFFIN and Dick Simon Trucking, Inc., Respondents. No. 3743. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard November 5, 2003. Filed February 3, 2004. Rehearing Denied March 18, 2004. *125 Kenneth

946 A.2d 103 (2008) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Andre PHILLIPS, Appellant. No. 2249 EDA 2006. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 8, 2008. Filed March 5, 2008. Reargument Denied May 7, 2008. *106 Richard T. Brown, Jr., Philadelphia, for appellant. Debra A. Breneman

Sheldon Lyvonne Curtis v. State of Maryland No. 455, Sept. Term 2022 Opinion by Leahy, J. Evidence > Maryland Rule 5-803(b)(4) > Statements for Purposes of Treatment or Diagnosis > Identification of Perpetrator The trial court did not err in finding that victim’s statement to her emergency care physician that she was assaulted by her boyfriend qualified as a statement made for purposes of medical treatment or diagnosis under Maryland Rule 5-803(b)(4) where: (1) the victim made the statement

Liss, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Clarence Mouzone, appellant, was charged with two counts of murder, two counts of use of a handgun in the commission of a felony, and two counts of carrying a handgun. The appellant was tried before a jury in the Criminal Court of Baltimore and convicted on all charges. A motion for a new trial was filed and denied. Appellant was thereupon sentenced to two consecut

682 F.Supp.2d 512 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Steve WILLOCK, et al. Criminal No.: WDQ-08-0086. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Northern Division. January 7, 2010. *518 Andrew C. White, Silverman, Thompson, Slutkin and White, LLC, Thomas J. Saunders, Law Office of Thomas J. Saunders, Richard B. Bardos, Schulman,

63 Md. App. 485 (1985) 492 A.2d 1343 GUY R. JOHNSON AND GREGORY J. PIERSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1100, September Term, 1984. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 5, 1985. Victoria S. Keating, Asst. Public Defender, Baltimore (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, Baltimore, on brief), for appellants. Valerie V. Cloutier, Asst. At

234 F.Supp.2d 711 (2002) AK STEEL CORP. Plaintiff v. SOLLAC & UGINE Defendants No. C-1-98-690, C-1-98-804. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. July 30, 2002. *712 *713 David E. Schmit, Ann G. Robinson, Frost, Brown, Todd, LLC, Cincinnati, OH, John J. Kuzman, Jr., AK

903 P.2d 110 (1995) 127 Idaho 521 Michael L. BEALE and Christine K. Beale, husband and wife, and Christine K. Beale, as parent and Guardian Ad Litem for Joshua C. Beale, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael SPECK and Gloria S. Speck, husband and wife, and Gregory L. Speck, Defendants-Respondents. No. 20873. Court of Appeals of Idaho. August 11, 199

332 S.C. 433 (1998) 504 S.E.2d 605 John Kevin CLARK and Maggie Lee Anderson, Respondents, v. Annette Rochelle CANTRELL, Appellant. No. 2879. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 4, 1998. Decided August 10, 1998. Rehearing Denied September 17, 1998. *438 Jack D.

696 F.Supp.2d 536 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Steve WILLOCK, et al. Criminal No. WDQ-08-0086. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Northern Division. March 23, 2010. *538 Andrew C. White, Silverman Thompson Slutkin and White LLC, Baltimore, MD, for Van Sneed. Thomas J. Saunders, Law Office of Thomas J. Saunder

Kobina Ebo Abruquah v. State of Maryland, No. 10, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Fader, C.J. EVIDENCE – EXPERT EVIDENCE Firearms identification examiner testifying as an expert witness should not have been permitted to offer an unqualified opinion that crime scene bullets and a bullet fragment were fired from the petitioner’s gun. The reports, studies, and testimony presented to the circuit court demonstrate that the firearms identification methodology employed by the examiner in this case c

Kobina Ebo Abruquah v. State of Maryland, No. 10, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Fader, C.J. EVIDENCE – EXPERT EVIDENCE Firearms identification examiner testifying as an expert witness should not have been permitted to offer an unqualified opinion that crime scene bullets and a bullet fragment were fired from the petitioner’s gun. The reports, studies, and testimony presented to the circuit court demonstrate that the firearms identification methodology employed by the examiner in this case c

882 A.2d 900 (2005) 164 Md. App. 95 Joseph William MARQUARDT, Jr. v. STATE of Maryland. No. 355, September Term, 2004. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 8, 2005. *908 Brian L. Zavin (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellant. Diane E. Keller (J. Joseph