Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge. Named plaintiffs Gregory and Alicia Scott have filed a proposed class action Complaint, seeking civil damages from Defendant First American Title Insurance Company (First American), on behalf of those persons who paid a title insurance premium to Defendant that exceeded the premium permitted by the rate schedules it had on file wi

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Gregory Haynes (“Haynes”) was the counsel for the plaintiff in the underlying action. The district court determined that Haynes continued pursuit of plaintiffs claims, after it was clear that the claims were frivolous and in bad faith. The court also determined that the defendants had incurred excess costs and fees of ov

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SCOTT D. NORDSTROM, No. 12-15738 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:11-cv-02344- DGC-MEA CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADOC; A. RAMOS, Deputy Warden; F. HAWTHORNE, OPINION Defendants-Appellees. Appe

SCOTT MASON PRATHO, M.D. V. LUPE ZAPATA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR SABRINA ZAPATA AND GREGORY ZAPATA, AND AS HEIR OR REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF REYNALDO ZAPATA, DECEASED (comment: 1) COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-051-CV SCOTT MASON PRATHO, M.D. APPELLANT AND APPELLEE V.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARTIN O. WILLEY, and AMY J. ) WILLEY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N24C-10-259 CEB ) JOHN W. SCOTT, NICOLE D. SCOTT, ) JWSBCS, LLC

Justice WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, we again consider the limits of the causal nexus between conduct and harm that is necessary to support liability in tort. Jodi Marie Mason voluntarily entered a mental health care facility seeking treatment for depression. Three weeks later, Mason’s physician discharged her at her request. A little over a day after Mason’s d

GREGORY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In my view, Trooper Blake Swicord violated Victor Mason’s Fourth Amendment rights by extending the length and scope of Mason’s detention beyond that which was necessary for a routine traffic violation, without reasonable suspicion to believe that any further illegal activity was afoot. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 67) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This litigation involves a contract dispute between Beco Dairy Inc. (“BECO”) and Global Tech Systems, Inc. (“GTS”) concerning the development and licensing of dairy technology. II. PROCEDURAL

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-4536 _____________________________ LAURI BURRIS, GREGORY F. BURRIS, DOUGLAS O. ROWE, RONALD E. BROWN, JR., JACOB CHAPMAN, and MELISSA BURRIS, Petitioners, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-4536 _____________________________ LAURI BURRIS, GREGORY F. BURRIS, DOUGLAS O. ROWE, RONALD E. BROWN, JR., JACOB CHAPMAN, and MELISSA BURRIS, Petitioners, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

28 U.S.C. § 1491, (Tucker Act Jurisdiction); Rule 56 of the United States Court of Federal Claims, (Summary Judgment). MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRADEN, Judge. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACK-

*3 Chief Justice Ketchum: This case concerns a will contest in which the decedent, Christine Ebert, executed two wills: the first in West Virginia in 2012, and the second in New York in 2014, ten days before she died of, among other causes, dementia. Petitioner Russell Mason (“Plaintiff Mason”), the named exe

MEMORANDUM * Plaintiffs-appellants John and Denise Soldano appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States, following a bench trial, on the Soldanos’ negligence claim under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. “To recover damages for negligence a plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s conduct was

MEMORANDUM * Plaintiffs-appellants John and Denise Soldano appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States, following a bench trial, on the Soldanos’ negligence claim under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. “To recover damages for negligence a plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s conduct was

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the degree of evi-dentiary specificity with which a removing defendant must prove jurisdiction to defeat a motion to remand under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). Defendant-Appellant Cricket *192 Communications, LLC (“Cricket”)

ORDER AND REASONS BERRIGAN, District Judge. These matters come before the Court on motions to remand filed by the plaintiffs in each of the above captioned cases.1 Having considered the records, the memoranda of counsel and the law, the Court has determined that remand is appropriate for the following reasons. The plaintiffs filed these suits in

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) served the respondent with a petition dated March 11, 2008 containing 10 charges of professional misconduct. After a prehearing conference on July 28, 2008 and a hearing on September 10, 2008, the Special Referee sustained all charges with the exception

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Jul 18 2016, 9:12 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Cour

396 F.Supp.2d 837 (2005) Maurice MASON, Petitioner, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:99CV524. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. October 31, 2005. *838 *839 Carol A. Wright, David C. Stebbins, Columbus, OH, Patricia A. Snyder, Cleveland, OH, for Petitioner.<