Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0080p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee,

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Ciklin, C.J. Celestor Gregory appeals his convictions and sentences. He alleges numerous errors, but we affirm because his arguments are either unpreserved or without merit, or both. However, we write to address his argument that the trial court fundamentally erred by failing to instract the jury on the justifiable use of deadly force. Gregory was charged with robbery with a weapon and battery after steal

DAMOORGIAN, C.J. Celestor Ortez Gregory appeals his judgment and sentences for robbery with a weapon and battery. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury on self-defense and by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the *653robbery count. Appellant also argues that his convictions for robbery with a weapon and battery viola

[Cite as State v. Gregory, 2013-Ohio-853.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 6-12-02 v. TRACE ELLIOT GREGORY, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Hardin County Common Pleas Court Tri

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. TAYLOR, Bankruptcy Judge. In these two otherwise unrelated bankruptcy cases, the debtor’s counsel and the chapter 13 trustee seek a judicial resolution to an issue concerning attorney’s fees. This Memorandum Opinion emphasizes the Ira Rogers case but also disposes of the Tracy Lawson, Sr. proceeding. The law firm of Niblock & Bueker

*513 PER CURIAM. Gregory Gibson pleaded guilty to sex trafficking of a child. In calculating the advisory Guidelines range, the district court 1 applied a two-level enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 2G1.3(b

R. Baker, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority that the reinstatement of child support for the adult child was in error and must be reversed. I also agree to affirm the award of attorney’s fees. However, I dissent from the majority’s opinion on two points. I would not hold that the trial court erred in: (1) ordering Gregory

CLIFF HOOFMAN, Judge. |,Appellant Sue Gregory appeals the trial court’s decision ordering forfeiture of a scanner, camera, and computer that had been seized during a search of Gregory’s property eight years prior to the forfeiture hearing. Gregory argues on appeal that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision because the statute in question, Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-505, doe

938 N.E.2d 18 (2010) Gregory M. SMALL, Appellant, v. Frank A. ROGERS, Appellee. No. 29A02-1001-PL-30. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 17, 2010. *19 Richard C. Richmond, III, Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Arend J. Abel, Kelley J. Johnson, Cohen & Malad, LLP, Indian

958 N.E.2d 4 (2011) James E. ROGERS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 84A01-1104-CR-148. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 30, 2011. *6 Mark Everett Watson, Terre Haute, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Karl M. Scharnberg, Deputy Attorney Gene

Korsmo, C.J. ¶61 (dissenting) — The thoughtful majority opinion sets forth the proper legal standard, but this case turns on James Rogers’ failure to prove his allegation. Given appellant’s failure to provide any evidence from his trial counsel, the trial court had an ample reason to reject the claim. There was no abuse of discretion. I respectfully dissent. ¶62 Three different local attorneys represented Mr. Rog

FEW, C.J. A jury found Timmy Rogers guilty of murdering his paramour’s husband, Fred Engel. Rogers argues the trial court erred when it refused to direct a verdict in his favor. We affirm. I. Background In the early morning hours of April 22, 2008, police found Engel’s body in the woods near a bank of mailboxes in the subdivision where he lived. A forensic pathologist determined the ki

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT FILED: DECEMBER 22, 2015 No. 08-3037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. GREGORY BELL, ALSO KNOWN AS BOY-BOY, ALSO KNOWN AS BUNGA, APPELLANT Consolidated with 11-3032 On Petitions for Rehearing En Banc Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS,

OPINION BORMAN, District Judge. Gregory Alec Phillips, a former federal prisoner now on supervised release, was indicted on December 7, 2004, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee. (R. 3, Sealed Indictment.) 1 The one-count indictment charged that on or about November 2

PER CURIAM. Appellant was convicted of two counts of robbery with a firearm and one count of aggravated assault. We affirm these convictions without further comment, but reverse and remand for resentencing pursuant to the Florida Supreme Court’s recent decision in Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla.2016). Below, the trial court imposed consecutive mandat

Roger A. Page, J. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee has submitted a certified question of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23 regarding the interpretation of two insurance policies: "Under Tennessee law, may an insurer in making an actual cash value payment withhold a portion of repair labor as depreciation when the policy (1) defines ac

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge: Gregory Fair pled guilty to copyright infringement, in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 506(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319, and mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, the district court ordered him to pay restitution to

ORDER We consider Gregory Bos’s motion to recover attorney’s fees under California Civil Code § 1717, and the fee-shifting provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. I The facts giving rise to .the present request for attorney’s fees are more fully set forth in our underlying opinion on the merits. See

By Judge Timothy K. Sanner The purpose of this letter is to address the one remaining issue with respect to the multiple demurrers and pleas in bar filed by the defendants with respect to the above-referenced case. The sole issue remaining is whether the statement in numbered paragraph nine of the First Amended Complaint is defamatory. The statement, allegedly made by Caleb Sulzen is “I personally did not inspect the retainin