Cases

COGBURN, District Judge, concurring: I fully concur with Judge Gregory’s majority opinion. Since the issue before the court was created by gerrymandering, and based on the evidence received at trial, I write only to express my concerns about how unfettered gerrymandering is negatively impacting our republican form of government. Voters should choose their representatives. Mitchell N. Berma

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clinton D. Cox, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we g

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge GREGORY joined. PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: Jeremy Fontanez, a federal inmate, filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking release from the obligation to make restitution payments through the Bureau of Prisons’ Inmate Financial Respo

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On November 18, 2013, the Plaintiffs Thomas Fedele, Matthew Anderson, Gregory Aurigemma, Arturo F. Ramirez-Calle and Alec Zef (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and certain tax secrecy statutes against the Defendants Marianne Harris, Kiaran Johnson-Lew, Mary Starr, Richard Ernst, Jamie Woodward, Honora

815 F.Supp.2d 6 (2011) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 27, 2011. *7 Bryan Taylor Veis, James Brian McTigue, James A. Moore, McTigue & Porter, Gregory Yann Porter, Bailey & Glasser, LLP, Washing

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-1849 _____________________________ GREGORY HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA; JUDGE THOMAS REBULL; ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY GRISKA MENA RODRIGUEZ; ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY STEVEN DEMANOVICH; ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY NATALIE SNYDER; ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER KELLY FOSTER; JELANI DAVIS; JOHNNY BROUDY, Appel

ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIY. P. 12(b)(1) (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) (3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE NEW ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF [ECF Nos. 49, 50.]

815 F.Supp.2d 26 (2011) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 2, 2011. Bryan Taylor Veis, James Brian McTigue, James A. Moore, McTigue & Porter, Gregory Yann Porter, Bailey & Glasser, LLP, Washington, DC, Athanasios Basdekis, Br

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-0064 Filed February 3, 2021 GREGORY DONALD HARRIS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Coleman McAllister, Judge. Gregory Harris appeals the denial of his application for postconviction relief. AFFI

728 F.Supp. 1259 (1990) Richard GREGORY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS-TEETER SUPERMARKETS, INC., Defendant. No. C-C-87-0461-P. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. January 22, 1990. Michael A. Sheely, Russell & Sheely, Charlotte, N.C., for plaintiff. John O. Pollard, Bl

815 F.Supp.2d 12 (2011) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 3, 2011. *13 Bryan Taylor Veis, McTigue & Porter, James Brian McTigue, James A. Moore, McTigue & Veis, LLP, Gregory Yann Porter, B

673 F.Supp.2d 8 (2009) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 14, 2009. *9 Bryan Taylor Veis, James Brian McTigue, McTigue & Porter, James A. Moore, McTigue & Veis, LLP, Washington, DC, Brian

MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Plaintiffs William S. Harris, Reginald E. Howard, and Peter M. Thornton, Sr. are former employees of Waste Management Holdings, Inc. (“Old Waste” or “the Company”) and participants in the Waste Management Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (“Old Waste Plan” or “Plan”). They bring this action on

722 F.Supp.2d 44 (2010) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 10, 2010. *46 Bryan Taylor Veis, James Brian McTigue, James A. Moore, McTigue & Porter, Gregory Yann Porter, Bailey & Glasser, LLP,

602 F.Supp.2d 39 (2009) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 12, 2009. *41 James Brian McTigue, Gregory Yann Porter, McTigue & Porter, LLP, Washington, DC, Ellen M. Doyle, Joel R. Hurt, Stember Fei

736 F.Supp.2d 528 (2010) Gregory O'BRIEN, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ARGO PARTNERS, INC. a/k/a Argo Partners, Defendant. No. CV 09-1020. United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 23, 2010. *530 Harris, Cutler, Cash & Houghteling, LLP by Steven A. Cash, Esq., Washington, D.C.,

216 F.Supp.2d 10 (2002) Gregory G. HARRIS, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Paul S. HUDSON; Paul J. Hudson; William David Hudson; William B. Hudson, as Trustee of William David Hudson, an Infant; and Stephen Hudson, Defendants. No. 1:02-CV-614. United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 13, 2002. *11 O'Connell and Aronowitz (Micha

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING We overrule relator's motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc. We withdraw our previous opinion dated May 24, 1991, substitute this, and deny leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator, Claudean Terrazas Cone, guardian of the trust estates of her children (the Guardian), Christine and Stephen, seeks mandamus relief from the May 15, 1991 order of Judge Pat Gregory transferring venue of the underlyi

*680 OPINION ON REHEARING CRONE, Judge. Both Gregory A. Harris and the State have petitioned for rehearing of our opinion in Harris v. State, 992 N.E.2d 887 (Ind.Ct.App.2013), in which we held that (1) Harris’s acquittal on a rape charge did not preclude relitigati

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION EUGENE R. WEDOFF, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding is before the court on the defendant’s motion for approval of a settlement. The defendant, Jay Steinberg, is the Chapter 7 trustee of debtor Resource Technology Corporation (“RTC”). The plaintiff, Ungaretti & Harris, LLP (“U & H”) was counsel to RTC’s former Chapter 11 trustee, Gregg Szilagyi. U & H a