Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gregory Mize”
Mize v. Westbrook Construction Co. of Oxfordpublic domain
BARNES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Jerry Mize filed suit to quiet and confirm the title to his property, which he argues extends slightly south of County Road 206 in Lafayette County, Mississippi. His neighbors to the south counterclaimed, asserting that according to them deeds, they own the property to the centerline of County Road 206, and, even if their deeds are incorrect, they own the land by adverse posses
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI RANDOLPH, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. This case arises from a property-line dispute between neighboring landowners in Lafayette County, Mississippi. Jerry Mize filed suit to confirm title to property described in a recorded corrected warranty deed. Westbrook Construction Company of Oxfor
Culliton v. Mizepublic domain
403 N.W.2d 853 (1987) Ambrose CULLITON, et al., Appellants, v. Gregory MIZE, et al., Respondents. No. C7-86-1367. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 14, 1987. Joseph J. Roby, Jr., Johnson, Killen, Thibodeau & Seiler, P.A., Duluth, for appellants. Timothy O. Lee, Duluth, for respondents. Heard, considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and LANSING
POLITZ, Chief Judge: Gregory James Catón appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s application of collateral estoppel to an Illinois state court default judgment in its determination that said judgment was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). For the reasons assigned, we affirm.
USCA11 Case: 23-13847 Document: 63-1 Date Filed: 09/17/2025 Page: 1 of 19 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13847 ____________________ OAKES FARMS FOOD & DISTRIBUTION SE
Gregory Lee Boggs v. Dinah K. Rheapublic domain
OPINION D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., C.J., and THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., joined. *541 Gregory Lee Boggs and Lisa Danielle (Pickens) Boggs (“Pl
Forrest Woods v. Gregory Schwartzpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1234 F ORREST W OODS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. G REGORY S CHWARTZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 07 C 438—Wayne R. And
Worthington v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER This matter was previously before us as one of two consolidated appeals. See *Page 930 McFerguson v. United States, 770 A.2d 66 (D.C. 2001). As to co-appellant McFerguson, we affirmed the judgments of conviction. Regarding appellant Worthington, however, we remanded the record with directions for the trial court to make further findings with respect
VINEVILLE CAPITAL GROUP, LLC v. McCOOKpublic domain
Branch, Judge. Under OCGA § 44-14-80, title to real property conveyed by a security deed that has not been cancelled or foreclosed upon after a certain period of time reverts to the grantor as a matter of law. The statute sets the default time period at seven years starting, depending on the circumstances, from either the maturity of the debt or from the date of the original conve
Hew Federal Credit Union v. Battlepublic domain
The issue before us, one of first impression in the District of Columbia but by no means a stranger to other courts, is whether a guarantor of a secured loan who does not own the collateral is nevertheless a "debtor" within the meaning of Title 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC"), D.C. Code § 28:9-101 et seq. (1996), so as to require the creditor to give the guarantor notice of a foreclosure sale in *Page 2
Horton, Anthony v. Grams, Gregorypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-1008 ANTHONY HORTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JON E. LITSCHER, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court
Price v. Mizepublic domain
628 P.2d 705 (1981) Robert G. PRICE and James L. Price, Appellees, v. Jerry L. MIZE, Appellant. No. 54646. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 28, 1981. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1981. James H. Ivy, Waurika, and Justus Hefley, Anadarko, for appellees. Morrel, Herrold, West, Hodgson, Shelton & Striplin, P.A. by Donald E. Herrold, and George L.
Mize v. Gardner Motor Co.public domain
Gregory, J., delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff in error as administratrix of the estate of George Talmadge Mize, deceased, brought an action at law against the partners of the Gardner Motor Company and the Southern Railway Company to recover damages for the death of Mize, who was riding as a passenger in an automobile belonging to the Gardner Motor Company and being driven by itsi agent, Turner
Mize v. Beker Industries Corp.public domain
436 So.2d 1333 (1983) Lovett D. MIZE v. BEKER INDUSTRIES CORP., the Duriron Company, Inc., Mechanical Services, Inc., Lou Cupler, Ralph Tucker, Percy Colon, Lester Breaux, Jack Dano and Glenn Breau. No. 83-CA-333. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. August 8, 1983. Gregory F. Gambel, Cummings & Gambel, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant. Stanle
Robert Spierer v. Corey Rossmanpublic domain
MANION, Circuit Judge. After a night of heavy drinking, Lauren Spierer, a twenty-year-old Indiana University student, left the apartment of a classmate and disappeared. Four years later, she remains missing. Lauren’s parents brought suit against three students who were with Lauren in the hours before her disappearance, alleging negligence and violations of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act.
Mize v. Pennington Gap Bank, Inc.public domain
Gregory, J., delivered the opinion of the court. In November, 1920, S. B. Poteet instituted a chancery suit against T. B. Ely, et als, the purpose of which was *268to enforce the payment of certain liens by subjecting the real estate of the defendants to sale. Only a portion of the lands involved in that suit, namely the 144 acre tract and the
In re Taylorpublic domain
Opinion BAXTER, J. On November 7, 2006, the voters enacted Proposition 83, The Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica’s Law (Prop. 83, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2006); hereafter Proposition 83 or Jessica’s Law). “Proposition 83 was a wide-ranging initiative intended to ‘help Californians better protect themselves, their children,
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-2015 Lower Tribunal No. 2019-CA-000676 _____________________________ ROSEMARY CONLEY, Appellant, v. WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC.,
Opinion for the Court filed by District Judge THOMAS F. HOGAN. THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge: This case presents the question whether a member of the Council of the District of Columbia enjoys absolute legislative immunity to certain constitutional and common law claims arising out of the member’s firing of a legislative researcher. The district court
BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. Jonespublic domain
558 S.E.2d 398 (2001) 252 Ga. App. 824 BP EXPLORATION & OIL, INC. v. JONES. Jones v. BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. Nos. A01A1207, A01A1208. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 15, 2001. Reconsideration Denied, December 7, 2001. *401 Alston & Bird, Gerald L. Mize, Jr.