Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gregory Mark Sanchez”
State v. Sanchezpublic domain
Chambers, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part) — I agree with the majority that former RCW 9.94A.110 (2000)12 requires a presentence report to be prepared by a Department of Corrections community corrections officer. I also agree that anyone entering a plea should reasonably understand the recommendation from a community corrections officer might differ from
Sanchez v. Medicorp Health Systempublic domain
618 S.E.2d 331 (2005) 270 Va. 299 Leasly SANCHEZ v. MEDICORP HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a MARY WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, INC. Record No. 042741. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 16, 2005. Robert W. Mann (Scott C. Wall; Young, Haskins, Mann, Gregory & Smith, on brief), Martinsville, for appellant. Carlyle R. Wimbish, III (Margaret F. Hardy;
Gregory Sanchez v. Stripes LLC and Stripes Convenience Store, an Assumed or Common Namepublic domain
OPINION Opinion by: Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice As Appellant Gregory Sanchez walked towards the men’s restroom in one of Ap-pellees’ convenience stores, he walked around a wet floor warning sign located in the hallway outside the 'bathroom area. Sanchez insists the hallway floor was dry when he walked into the restroom, but when he walked out, the hallway floor was wet; he slipped, fell,
State of Tennessee v. Decory Sanchez Smithpublic domain
10/06/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 16, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DECORY SANCHEZ SMITH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC-20-CR-647 Robert T. Bateman, Judge __________________________________
United States v. Sanchezpublic domain
RICHARD W. STORY, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller [Doc. No. 336]. Defendant Sanchez has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 342], and the Court has reviewed his objections de novo. The Court is persuaded by the analysis contained within the Report and Recommendation and finds that the post-arrest statemen
United States v. Gregory Stephenpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1966 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Gregory Scott Stephen
State v. Sanchezpublic domain
2015 UT App 58 _________________________________________________________ THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILBERT SANCHEZ, Defendant and Appellant. Memorandum Decision No. 20121030-CA Filed March 12, 2015 Fifth District Court, St. Geor
Leonard Sanchez v. Statepublic domain
NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE CHIEF JUSTICE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR ROGELIO VALDEZ CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) JUSTICES
Shumski, Mark Josephpublic domain
PD-0408-15 April 15, 2015 Cause No. ________________ TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ------------------------------------------------------------------ MARK JOSEPH SHUMSKI Petitioner
Leonard Sanchez v. Statepublic domain
NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE CHIEF JUSTICE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR ROGELIO VALDEZ CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) JUSTICES
Sanchez v. Gomezpublic domain
PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Defendant City of El Paso's [hereinafter "Defendant"] "Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint" (ECF No. 22) [hereinafter "Motion"], filed on June 29, 2017, Plaintiffs Celia Sanchez and Oscar Salas's [hereinafter collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs"] "Response to Defendant City of El Paso's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss" (ECF No
Shumski, Mark Josephpublic domain
PD-0408-15 Cause No. ________________ TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ------------------------------------------------------------------ MARK JOSEPH SHUMSKI Petitioner VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS
Amado Roberto Sanchez v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-18-00307-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG AMADO ROBERTO SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 105th District Court
Pickering v. Sanchezpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49801 JENNIFER PICKERING and CHRIS ) PICKERING, ) ) Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants- ) Respondents, ) ) v. )
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORGAN T. ZURN LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 July 23, 2024 Blake A. Be
Jemie Sanchez v. Arlington County School Boardpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2245 Doc: 32 Filed: 01/18/2023 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2245 JEMIE SANCHEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARLINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant - Appellee.
State v. Sanchezpublic domain
Siddoway, A.C.J. ¶1 Jose Luis Sanchez Jr. was convicted of two counts of aggravated first degree murder and other crimes for his home invasion robbery of a Yakima drug dealer and execution-style shooting of the family that left two dead and two injured. He makes numerous assignments of error. Key among them are the trial court’s disqualification of his original appointed lawyers, its conduct of his trial in a jailhouse courtroom,
State v. Sanchez-Alfonsopublic domain
241 P.3d 1194 (2010) 238 Or. App. 160 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Luis SANCHEZ-ALFONSO, Defendant-Appellant. C051693CR; A135246. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 8, 2010. Decided October 27, 2010. *1195 Bronson D. James, Chief Deputy Defender, argued the
Jesse Gregory Edmond v. Commonwealth of Virginiapublic domain
MALVEAUX, Judge. Jesse Gregory Edmond (appellant) appeals his conviction for murder, in violation of Code § 18.2-32, robbery, in violation of Code § 18.2-58, conspiracy to commit robbery, in violation of Code §§ 18.2-58, -22, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1, and use of a firearm in commission of a felony, subsequent offense, in viol
United States v. Gregory Givenspublic domain
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. A jury found Gregory Latrell Givens guilty of being a felon in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and possessing with the intent to distribute crack cocaine after having been previously convicted of one or more felony drug offenses in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C) and 851. Prior to trial, Givens filed a mo