Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gregory Lee Gable”
Gable v. National Broadcasting Co.public domain
727 F.Supp.2d 815 (2010) Mark GABLE a/k/a Mark Pizzuti, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY ("NBC"), a California corporation, Gregory Thomas Garcia, an individual, 20th Century Fox Film Corporation, a corporation, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 08-4013 SVW (FFMx). United States District Court, C.D. California. F
Gregory T. Shelton v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00195-COA GREGORY T. SHELTON A/K/A GREGORY APPELLANT SHELTON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/03/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TOMIE T. GREEN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
Gregory Tyler Moore v. State of Mississippipublic domain
BARNES, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. On August 5, 2013, Gregory Tyler Moore pleaded guilty to five counts of auto burglary and one count of burglary of a dwelling and was sentenced by the Rankin County Circuit Court to fifty years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). 1 Moore filed two motions for post-conviction relief (PCR) in 2014 (one for his auto-bu
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CHARLES WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. GREGORY TONY, as Sheriff of Broward County Florida, ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., and WANDA LOWES, R.N., Appellees. No. 4D20-1342 [May 5,
N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Judge _JjThe City of Bethel Heights appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to appellees on its breach-of-contract claim. Bethel Heights argues that a contract existed between the parties and that appellees breached the contract. We affirm. Appellees, the Gregory
SHEPHERD, J. Strategic Empowerment for Economic Development, Inc. (SEED), the seller in a commercial real estate transaction, appeals an interlocutory order granting its motion to dissolve a lis pendens filed by broker, South Dade Realty, Inc. (SDR), to the extent it purports to encumber or cloud title to the real property subject to the contract for sale, see § 475.42(l)(j), Fla.
Nelson v. Linn Midcontinent Exploration, L.L.C.public domain
228 P.3d 533 (2009) 2009 OK CIV APP 99 Karen NELSON, Trustee of the Revocable InterVivos Trust of Karen Nelson, Dated May 4, 1989, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. LINN MIDCONTINENT EXPLORATION, L.L.C., f/k/a Dominion Midcontinent Exploration, L.L.C., Defendant/Appellee. No. 105,751. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. Court of Civ
CTI SERVICES LLC v. Haremzapublic domain
797 F.Supp.2d 1257 (2011) CTI SERVICES LLC, d/b/a Citadel Technologies and Roger Walker, Plaintiffs, v. Ken HAREMZA, an individual; T.D. Williamson, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation; Energy Maintenance Services Group I, LLC, successor-in-interest to Energy Facility Services, Inc.; Hunting Specialized Products, Inc.; Hydratech Engineered Products, L.L.C; and Hunting Pipeline Services, L.L.C., Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-144-GKF-T
Nathan v. Batespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Alan Nathan appeals the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice his complaint filed against appellees, Steve and Cheryl Floyd. We affirm because neither Nathan’s complaint nor the Floyds’ affidavits provided a basis for the trial court’s jurisdiction. The Floyds’ affidavits conclusively demonstrate that they did not satisfy the Constitutional due process requirements for sufficient mi
MDS (Canada), Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.public domain
822 F.Supp.2d 1263 (2011) MDS (CANADA), INC., Best Theratronics, Ltd., and Best Medical International, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. RAD SOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-61652-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. September 30, 2011. *1271 Leonardo N. Ortiz, Jr., Moore & Lee, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for P
PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. The Family Law Rules Committee (Committee) has filed an out-of-cycle report under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.140(f), pro
General Motors Corp. v. Phat Cat Carts, Inc.public domain
504 F.Supp.2d 1278 (2006) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. PHAT CAT CARTS, INC., a Florida corporation f/k/a The Little Car Company, Inc., Defendant. No. 8:06-cv-900-SCB-MSS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. October 18, 2006. Preliminary Injunction Order November 1, 2006. Order on Moti
Del Rosario v. Labor Ready Southeast, Inc.public domain
OMNIBUS ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.E. 78, 80, 84) JOAN A. LENARD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant MDT Personnel, LLC’s (“MDT”) Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on January 5, 2015. (D.E. 78.) Plaintiffs filed their Response on January 29, 2015, (D.E. 95), to which MDT filed a Reply on February 9, 2015, (D.E. 101). The Pa
Banta Properties, Inc. v. Arch Specialty Insurancepublic domain
PER CURIAM: In light of our opinion in Banta Properties, Inc. v. Arch Specialty Insurance Co., No. 12-14186, - Fed.Appx. -, 2014 WL 274478 (11th Cir. Jan. 24, 2014), we vacate the judgment regarding attorneys’ fees because Banta Properties, Inc. is no longer the prevailing party. See Fla. Stat. §§ 626.9373, 627.428. *565VACATED and
MDS (Canada) Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: This appeal presents a jurisdictional issue of first impression in our Court: whether the Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a breach *838of contract claim that would require the resolution of a claim of patent infringement for the complainant to succeed. We conclude that this Court does have appellate jurisdiction. We then add
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-0802 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.351. August 24, 2023 PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar’s Civil Procedure Rules Committee proposes amending Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.351 (Production of Documents and Things Without Deposition) to extend the period of
Sundown Energy, L.P. v. Harding & Shelton, Inc.public domain
245 P.3d 1226 (2010) 2010 OK 88 SUNDOWN ENERGY, L.P., Respondent/Appellant, v. HARDING & SHELTON, INC.; Dominion Exploration Mid-Continent, Inc.; Tex-Star, Inc.; and JMA Resources, Inc., Applicants/Respondents/Appellees, and The Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. 102,248. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. December 14, 2010.</
PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Forms. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. BACKGROUND The Family Law Rules Committee (Committee) has filed an out-of-cycle report recommendin
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RICHARD S. LEHMAN, individually and RICHARD S. LEHMAN, P. A., Appellants, v. EDNA RAMOS CHUE, individually, MADELAINE ARIAS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of HILDA PIZA LUCOM, LARRY MILLER, as Curator of the Estate of WILSON CHARLES LUCOM, MATIAS R. DORTA, individually, MATIAS R. DORTA, P.A., a Flor
MacLeod v. Citibank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a). TORPY, C.J., GRIFFIN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.